A O P Pa Dba Central Georgia Cancer Care

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

3
Total Citations
9
Total Deficiencyies
7
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 11D0264125
Address 800 First Street, Suite 410, Macon, GA, 31201
City Macon
State GA
Zip Code31201
Phone(478) 743-7068

Citation History (3 surveys)

Survey - May 23, 2022

Survey Type: Special

Survey Event ID: QKLR11

Deficiency Tags: D2016 D6000 D0000 D2130 D6016

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A proficiency testing desk review was completed on May 23, 2022. At the time of the review, the laboratory was not in compliance with the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988, 42 CFR 493.1 through 42 CFR 493.1780. The following deficiencies were cited: D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on proficiency testing desk review using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Casper Reports 155 and 153 and review of the laboratory's proficiency testing (PT) reports, the laboratory failed to maintain satisfactory performance in two consecative events (3rd event of 2021 and 1st event 2022), Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- resulting in the first unsuccessful occurrence for Cell ID or WBC Diff #765. Findings include: Refer to D2130 D2130 HEMATOLOGY CFR(s): 493.851(f) Failure to achieve satisfactory performance for the same analyte in two consecutive events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on proficiency testing desk review using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Casper Reports 155 and 153 and review of the laboratory's proficiency testing (PT) reports from the American Proficiency Institute (API), the laboratory failed to maintain satisfactory performance in two consecutive events (3rd event of 2021 and 1st event of 2022), resulting in the first unsuccessful occurrence for WBC Diff, analyte # 765. Findings include: 1. Desk review of Casper Reports 153 and 155 disclosed the laboratory failed analyte #765 WBC Diff on event 3 of 2021 with a score of 0% and event 1 of 2022 with a score of 32%. 2. Desk review of the laboratory's proficiency testing reports from API confirms the laboratory failed WBC Diff on events 3 of 2021 and event 1 of 2022 resulting in the first unsuccessful performance. D6000 MODERATE COMPLEXITY LABORATORY DIRECTOR CFR(s): 493.1403 The laboratory must have a director who meets the qualification requirements of 493. 1405 of this subpart and provides overall management and direction in accordance with 493.1407 of this subpart. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on proficiency testing desk review using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Casper Reports 155 and 153 and review of the laboratory's proficiency testing (PT) reports, the laboratory director failed to ensure the laboratory maintained satisfactory performance in two consecutive events (3rd events of 2021 and 1st event of 2022), resulting in the first unsuccessful occurrence for WBC Diff, analyte # 765. Findings include: Refer to D 6016 D6016 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1407(e)(4)(i) The laboratory director is responsible for the overall operation and administration of the laboratory, including the employment of personnel who are competent to perform test procedures, and record and report test results promptly, accurate, and proficiently and for assuring compliance with the applicable regulations. (e) The laboratory director must-- (e)(4)(i) Ensure that the proficiency testing samples are tested as required under Subpart H of this part; This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on proficiency testing desk review using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Casper Reports 155 and 153 and review of the laboratory's -- 2 of 3 -- proficiency testing (PT) reports, the laboratory director failed to ensure the laboratory maintained satisfactory performance in two consecutive events ( 3rd event of 2021 and 1st event of 2022), resulting in the first unsuccessful occurrence for WBC Diff, analyte # 765. Findings include: 1. Desk review of Casper Reports 153 and 155 disclosed the laboratory failed analyte #765, WBC Diff on event 3 of 2021 with a score of 0% and event 1 of 2022 with a score of 32%. 2. Desk review of the laboratory's proficiency testing reports from American Proficiency Institute (API) confirmed the laboratory failed WBC Diff on Event 3 of 2021 and Event 1 of 2022, resulting in the first unsuccessful performance. -- 3 of 3 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - January 30, 2020

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: JFKW11

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D5429

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) Recertification survey was completed on January 30, 2020. The laboratory was not in compliance with applicable CLIA requirements found at 42 CFR 493.1 through 42 CFR 493.1780. The following deficiencies were cited: D5429 MAINTENANCE AND FUNCTION CHECKS CFR(s): 493.1254(a)(1) For unmodified manufacturer's equipment, instruments, or test systems, the laboratory must perform and document maintenance as defined by the manufacturer and with at least the frequency specified by the manufacturer. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the Maintenance Logs for the ACE Axcel Chemistry Analyzer (ACE), and staff interview the laboratory failed to document some weekly and monthly maintenance on the Maintenance Logs. Findings: 1. A review of the ACE maintenance logs confirmed that the laboratory failed to document maintenance for the following months: April 2018 - No monthly or weekly maintenance documented May 2018 - No monthly or weekly maintenance documented, daily shutdown maintenance not documented for one day July 2018 - One week out of four weeks - weekly maintenance was not documented August 2019 - Three weeks out of four weeks - weekly maintenance was not documented September 2019 - One week out of four weeks - weekly maintenance was not documented, daily shutdown maintenance not documented for three days October 2019 - Two weeks out of four weeks - weekly maintenance was not documented. 2. Interview with staff # 2 (CMS 209 form) on January 30, 2020, at approximately 4:30 pm in the office, confirmed the aforementioned dates that maintenance was not documented. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 1 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - April 17, 2018

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: V18T11

Deficiency Tags: D5439 D0000

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) recertification survey was completed on April 17, 2018. The laboratory was not in compliance with all applicable CLIA requirements found at 42 CFR 493.1 through 42 CFR 493.1780. The following deficiencies were cited: D5439 CALIBRATION AND CALIBRATION VERIFICATION CFR(s): 493.1255(b) Unless otherwise specified in this subpart, for each applicable test system the laboratory must do the following: Perform and document calibration verification procedure - (b)(1) Following the manufacturer's calibration verification instructions; (b)(2) Using the criteria verified or established by the laboratory under 493.1253(b)(3) -- (b)(2)(i) Including the number, type, and concentration of the materials, as well as acceptable limits for calibration verification; and (b)(2)(ii) Including at least a minimal (or zero) value, a mid-point value, and a maximum value near the upper limit of the range to verify the laboratory's reportable range of test results for the test system; and (b)(3) At least once every 6 months and whenever any of the following occur: (b)(3)(i) A complete change of reagents for a procedure is introduced, unless the laboratory can demonstrate that changing reagent lot numbers does not affect the range used to report patient test results, and control values are not adversely affected by reagent lot number changes. (b)(3)(ii) There is major preventive maintenance or replacement of critical parts that may influence test performance. (b)(3)(iii) Control materials reflect an unusual trend or shift, or are outside of the laboratory's acceptable limits, and other means of assessing and correcting unacceptable control values fail to identify and correct the problem. (b)(3)(iv) The laboratory's established schedule for verifying the reportable range for patient test results requires more frequent calibration verification. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the calibration documents for the Horiba Pentra 60C+ and staff Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- interviw the laboratory failed to document the calibration for the Horiba Pentra 60C+ hematology analyzer at least every 6 months. Findings: 1. Review of the calibration documents for the Horiba pentra 60C+ hematology analyzer, from 2016, 2017 and 2018, the laboratory failed to document the calibration of the analyzer for a period of 12 months from October 2016 to October 2017. 2 Intreview with staff #2 (CMS 209 form), on April 17, 2018 at 4pm in the Conference Room, confirmed that there was no documentation that the Horiba Pentra 60C+ was calibrated between October 2016 and October 2017. -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access