Advanced Dermatology & Laser Center Of Redlands

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

2
Total Citations
11
Total Deficiencyies
11
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 05D0573825
Address 255 Terracina Blvd Ste 206, Redlands, CA, 92373
City Redlands
State CA
Zip Code92373
Phone(909) 792-8600

Citation History (2 surveys)

Survey - August 28, 2025

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: 3F9K11

Deficiency Tags: D3011 D5403 D6082 D5291 D5407

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D3011 FACILITIES CFR(s): 493.1101(d) Safety procedures must be established, accessible, and observed to ensure protection from physical, chemical, biochemical, and electrical hazards, and biohazardous materials. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on the surveyor's observation during the laboratory tour, review of the laboratory's policy and procedure, and interviews with Mohs Tech-office manager (MT-OM); the laboratory failed to establish safety procedures to ensure protection from physical, chemical, and biochemical materials. The findings include: 1. Based on the survey on August 28, 2025, at approximately 4:00 p.m. the laboratory failed to provide a written policy and procedures for laboratory safety. 2. Based on the observations during the laboratory tour where the Mohs processing and staining of samples took place, it was found that the laboratory lacked an eye wash. 3. The MT- OM affirmed by interviews August 28, 2025, at approximately 4:15 p.m. that the laboratory lacked safety procedures and eyewash in the Mohs processing area. 4. Based on the laboratory's annual testing volume declaration signed by the laboratory director on 8/26/2025, the laboratory processed and reported annually approximately 1,500 Mohs patients' test samples without an established and approved laboratory safety plan and eyewash in the Mohs procedure testing area. D5291 GENERAL LABORATORY SYSTEMS QUALITY ASSESSMENT CFR(s): 493.1239(a) The laboratory must establish and follow written policies and procedures for an ongoing mechanism to monitor, assess, and, when indicated, correct problems identified in the general laboratory systems requirements specified at 493.1231 through 493.1236. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on the lack of a Quality Assurance plan (QA), review of the laboratory's policies and procedures, and interview with the laboratory's staff; the laboratory failed to establish written policies and procedures for an ongoing mechanism to monitor and assess records identified in the general laboratory systems. The findings include: 1. Based on the day survey on August 28, 2025, at approximately 2:30 p.m., no documentation could be retrieved by the laboratory to show that a written QA plan was in place for the years 2023, 2024, and 2025. 2. Laboratory staff reviewed and documented two (2) times per year one (1) patient tracer. The laboratory staff randomly selected 2 patients annually and reviewed the requisition, final report, test results, QC, and preventive maintenance. However, no written QA plan was found at the time of the survey. 3. The laboratory staff confirmed by interview on August 28, 2025, at approximately 2:45 p.m., that the laboratory did not establish a QA plan to follow written policies and procedures reflecting the current practice for an ongoing mechanism to monitor and assess records identified in the general laboratory systems. 4. According to the testing declaration signed by the laboratory director on August 26, 2025, the laboratory performed annually 1,500 Mohs tests and diagnosis without an established written, signed and dated QA plan. D5403 PROCEDURE MANUAL CFR(s): 493.1251(b) (b) The procedure manual must include the following when applicable to the test procedure: (b)(1) Requirements for patient preparation; specimen collection, labeling, storage, preservation, transportation, processing, and referral; and criteria for specimen acceptability and rejection as described in 493.1242. (b)(2) Microscopic examination, including the detection of inadequately prepared slides. (b)(3) Step-by- step performance of the procedure, including test calculations and interpretation of results. (b)(4) Preparation of slides, solutions, calibrators, controls, reagents, stains, and other materials used in testing. (b)(5) Calibration and calibration verification procedures. (b)(6) The reportable range for test results for the test system as established or verified in 493.1253. (b)(7) Control procedures. (b)(8)

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - February 17, 2021

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: TELJ11

Deficiency Tags: D5217 D5411 D5221 D5413 D6094 D5415

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5217 EVALUATION OF PROFICIENCY TESTING PERFORMANCE CFR(s): 493.1236(c)(1) At least twice annually, the laboratory must verify the accuracy of any test or procedure it performs that is not included in subpart I of this part. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of lack of the laboratory's Evaluation of proficiency testing performance for its histopathology, and interview with the office manager, it was determined that the laboratory, at least twice annually, failed to verify the accuracy of histopathology testing it performed for the years of 2019 and 2020. The findings included: a. The laboratory performed Mohs surgery onsite including the examination of the skin tissue slides, a histopathology testing which is not included in subpart I of 42 CFR part 493. b. The laboratory failed to verify is the accuracy of histopathology testing performance at least twice annually for the years of 2019 and 2020. c. The office manager affirmed (2/17/21 @ 10:50 am) that there were no evaluation of histopathology proficiency testing performance or peer review documents available at the time of survey. D5221 EVALUATION OF PROFICIENCY TESTING PERFORMANCE CFR(s): 493.1236(d) All proficiency testing evaluation and verification activities must be documented. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of lack of the laboratory's Evaluation of proficiency testing performance for its histopathology, and interview with the office manager, it was determined that the laboratory, at least twice annually, failed to document all histopathology proficiency testing evaluation and verification activities for the years Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- of 2019 and 2020. The findings included: a. The laboratory performed Mohs surgery onsite including the examination of the skin tissue slides, a histopathology testing which is not included in subpart I of 42 CFR part 493. b. The laboratory failed to document the evaluation of histopathology testing performance at least twice annually for the years of 2019 and 2020. c. The office manager affirmed (2/17/21 @ 10:50 am) that there were no documents for the evaluation of histopathology proficiency testing performance or peer review documents for the years of 2019 and 2020 available at the time of survey. D5411 TEST SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, REAGENT CFR(s): 493.1252(a) Test systems must be selected by the laboratory. The testing must be performed following the manufacturer's instructions and in a manner that provides test results within the laboratory's stated performance specifications for each test system as determined under 493.1253. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the laboratory's policies and procedures (P&P) for Mohs surgery including the acceptable temperature condition of the Cryostat, observation of the histology staining facility in house, notice of the staining reagent supplies, and interview with the laboratory personnel, it was determined that the laboratory failed to perform and to follow its written P&P in a manner that provides test results within the laboratory's stated performance specifications. The findings included: a. The laboratory performs Mohs surgery procedures and process tissue slide cutting and staining onsite. b. The laboratory had established an acceptable temperature for a Cryostat temperature between -20 to -30 oC in its P&P. c. The Cryostat temperature records of 2020 from 1/9/2020 to 12/21/20, showed and indicated that acceptable temperature range between -15 to -29 oC which is inconsistent with its written P&P. d. The laboratory personnel affirmed (2/17/2021 @ 10:45 am) that the acceptable temperature range of -15 to -29 oC was on the chart which is different from the written P7P of -20 to -30 oC. D5413 TEST SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, REAGENT CFR(s): 493.1252(b) The laboratory must define criteria for those conditions that are essential for proper storage of reagents and specimens, accurate and reliable test system operation, and test result reporting. The criteria must be consistent with the manufacturer's instructions, if provided. These conditions must be monitored and documented and, if applicable, include the following: (1) Water quality. (2) Temperature. (3) Humidity. (4) Protection of equipment and instruments from fluctuations and interruptions in electrical current that adversely affect patient test results and test reports. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the laboratory's Cryostat temperature records, and interview with the laboratory personnel and the office manager, it was determined that the laboratory failed to monitor and document the Cryostat temperature and to ensure accurate and reliable test system operation, and test result reporting, and to assure the consistency with the written policies and procedure (P&P) of Mohs surgery procedures. The findings included: a. The laboratory performed Mohs surgery and process skin tissue -- 2 of 3 -- slide cutting and staining onsite. b. The laboratory failed to monitor and document the Cryostat temperature between 5/21/2020 and 12/21/2020 (total of 21). c. The laboratory personnel affirmed (2/7/2020 @ 10:45 am) that lack of Cryostat temperature documentations between 5/21/2020 and 12/21/2020. D5415 TEST SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, REAGENT CFR(s): 493.1252(c) Reagents, solutions, culture media, control materials, calibration materials, and other supplies, as appropriate, must be labeled to indicate the following: (1) Identity and when significant, titer, strength or concentration. (2) Storage requirements. (3) Preparation and expiration dates. (4) Other pertinent information required for proper use. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation of the histology staining facility in house, notice of the staining reagent supplies, and interview with the laboratory personnel, it was determined that the laboratory failed to labeled the reagent supplies properly when it was once opened to ensure the stability of the reagents, storage requirement, and expiration date. The findings included: a. The laboratory performs Mohs surgery procedures and process tissue cutting and staining onsite. b. The laboratory stored Gill 3 Hematoxylin and Eosin Working Solution. c. The Eosin bottle was labeled as 6/2020 opened, and Gill 3 was labeled as open date of 12-2020. d. The laboratory personnel affirmed the labeled information were "dated" rather than the month and the year. e. The laboratory failed to "date" the open date properly. D6094 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1445(e)(5) The laboratory director must ensure that the quality assessment programs are established and maintained to assure the quality of laboratory services provided and to identify failures in quality as they occur. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the lack of the evaluation of histopathology proficiency testing performance, observation of the histology staining facility in house, notice of the staining reagent supplies, and interview with the laboratory personnel and the office manager, it was determined that the laboratory director failed to ensure that the quality assessment programs were established and maintained to assure the quality of laboratory services provided and to identify failures in quality as they occur. The findings included: a. The laboratory failed to verify and to document, at least twice annually, the accuracy of the histopathology examination for the years of 2019 and 2020, see D-5217 and D-5221 b. The laboratory failed to monitor and document the Cryostat temperature properly, see D-5411 and D-5413 c. The laboratory failed to label a date, when the reagents once they were opened to ensure the quality of the reagents, see D-5415 -- 3 of 3 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access