Summary:
Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5215 EVALUATION OF PROFICIENCY TESTING PERFORMANCE CFR(s): 493.1236(b)(2) The laboratory must verify the accuracy of any analyte, specialty or subspecialty assigned a proficiency testing score that does not reflect laboratory test performance (that is, when the proficiency testing program does not obtain the agreement required for scoring as specified in subpart I of this part, or the laboratory receives a zero score for nonparticipation, or late return or results). This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on surveyor review of the Proficiency Testing (PT) records and interview with the Coordinator (CO), the laboratory failed to verify the accuracy of Hematology PT results obtained in event FH9 - C 2017 Comprehensive Hematology with Auto Differential from the College of American Pathologists (CAP). The findings include: 1. There was no evidence of the laboratory verified the accuracy of Hematology analytes when the laboratory received an exception code of 20 (no appropriate target /response cannot be graded on specimens FH9- 11-15 for: a. White Blood Cells (WBC) b. Red Blood Cells (RBC) c. Hematocrit d. Hemoglobin e. Platelets f. Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Eosinophils, Basophils - Absolute (#) and Percent (%) g. Absolute Neutrophil/Granulocyte - Absolute Count h. Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) i. Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (MCH) j. Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) 2. There was no evidence of review when the laboratory received and exception code of 26 ( educational challenge) for Immature Granulocytes # and % on samples FH9-11 thru FH9-15. 3. The CO confirmed on 5/23 /18 at 10:40 am the accuracy of PT results were not verified D5401 PROCEDURE MANUAL CFR(s): 493.1251(a) A written procedures manual for all tests, assays, and examinations performed by the Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 4 -- laboratory must be available to, and followed by, laboratory personnel. Textbooks may supplement but not replace the laboratory's written procedures for testing or examining specimens. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on surveyor review of the Procedure Manual (PM), Quality Control Records (QC) and interview with the Coordinator (CO), the laboratory failed to follow their PM for Hematology Testing performed on the Sysmex XNL 550 from September 2017 to the date of the survey. The findings include: 1. The laboratory did not follow the PM as stated below: a. Sysmex calibration verification was required every six months but there was no documented evidence calibration was performed after 8/15 /17. b. New QC lots were to be verified against the old lot before using but there was no documented evidence QC lots were verified prior to use. c. There was no documented evidence QC was reviewed. d. There was no documented evidence QC was evaluated for shifts and trends monthly. e. Temperature charts were not reviewed monthly from October 2017 to the date of the survey. 2. The CO confirmed on 5/23 /18 at 11:40 am that the PM was not followed. D5403 PROCEDURE MANUAL CFR(s): 493.1251(b) The procedure manual must include the following when applicable to the test procedure: (1) Requirements for patient preparation; specimen collection, labeling, storage, preservation, transportation, processing, and referral; and criteria for specimen acceptability and rejection as described in 493.1242. (2) Microscopic examination, including the detection of inadequately prepared slides. (3) Step-by-step performance of the procedure, including test calculations and interpretation of results. (4) Preparation of slides, solutions, calibrators, controls, reagents, stains, and other materials used in testing. (5) Calibration and calibration verification procedures. (6) The reportable range for test results for the test system as established or verified in 493.1253. (7) Control procedures. (8)