Bcg Medical Group

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

2
Total Citations
7
Total Deficiencyies
6
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 11D0264831
Address 340 Eisenhower Dr, Suite 1200, Savannah, GA, 31406
City Savannah
State GA
Zip Code31406
Phone(912) 443-4200

Citation History (2 surveys)

Survey - November 6, 2019

Survey Type: Special

Survey Event ID: PLKJ11

Deficiency Tags: D2016 D6000 D0000 D2130 D6016

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A proficiency testing desk review was completed on November 6, 2019. At the time of the review, the laboratory was not in compliance with the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988, 42 CFR 493.1 through 42 CFR 493.1780. The following deficiencies were cited: D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on proficiency testing desk review using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Casper Reports 155 and 153 and review of the laboratory's proficiency testing (PT) reports, the laboratory failed to maintain satisfactory performance in two of three consecutive events (1st and 2nd events of 2019), resulting Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- in the first unsuccessful occurrence for Hematology # 760 and Hematocrit (HCT) # 785. Findings include: Refer to D 2130 D2130 HEMATOLOGY CFR(s): 493.851(f) Failure to achieve satisfactory performance for the same analyte in two consecutive events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on proficiency testing desk review using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Casper Reports 155 and 153 and review of the laboratory's proficiency testing (PT) reports, the laboratory director failed to ensure the laboratory maintained satisfactory performance in two of three consecutive events (1st and 2nd events of 2019), resulting in the first unsuccessful occurrence for Hematology #0760 and Hematocrit (HCT) # 0785. The findings include: 1. Desk review of Casper Reports 153 and 155 disclosed the laboratory failed hematology #0760 on Event 1 of 2019 with a score of 73% and Event 2 of 2019 with a score of 70%. The laboratory failed hematocrit (HCT) #0785 on Event 1 of 2019 with a score of 20% and Event 2 of 2019 with a score of 60%. 2. The criteria for acceptable performance for the specialty of Hematology is a score of 80%. 3. Desk review of the laboratory's proficiency testing reports from the Medical Laboratory Evaluation (MLE) confirmed the laboratory failed hematology and hematocrit on Events 1and 2 of 2019 resulting in the first unsuccessful performance. D6000 MODERATE COMPLEXITY LABORATORY DIRECTOR CFR(s): 493.1403 The laboratory must have a director who meets the qualification requirements of 493. 1405 of this subpart and provides overall management and direction in accordance with 493.1407 of this subpart. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on proficiency testing desk review using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Casper Reports 155 and 153 and review of the laboratory's proficiency testing (PT) reports, the laboratory director failed to ensure the laboratory maintained satisfactory performance in two of three consecutive events (1st and 2nd events of 2019), resulting in the first unsuccessful occurrence for Hematology #0760 and Hematocrit (HCT) # 0785. Findings include: Refer to D 6016 D6016 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1407(e)(4)(i) The laboratory director is responsible for the overall operation and administration of the laboratory, including the employment of personnel who are competent to perform test procedures, and record and report test results promptly, accurate, and proficiently and for assuring compliance with the applicable regulations. (e) The laboratory director must-- (e)(4)(i) Ensure that the proficiency testing samples are tested as required under Subpart H of this part; -- 2 of 3 -- This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on proficiency testing desk review using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Casper Reports 155 and 153 and review of the laboratory's proficiency testing (PT) reports, the laboratory director failed to ensure the laboratory maintained satisfactory performance in two of three consecutive events (1st and 2nd events of 2019), resulting in the first unsuccessful occurrence for Hematology #0760 and Hematocrit (HCT) # 0785. The findings include: 1. Desk review of Casper Reports 153 and 155 disclosed the laboratory failed Hematology #0760 on Event 1 of 2019 with a score of 73% and Event 2 of 2019 with a score of 70%. The laboratory failed hematocrit (HCT) #0785 on Event 1 of 2019 with a score of 20% and Event 2 of 2019 with a score of 60%. 2. The criteria for acceptable performance for the specialty of Hematology is a score of 80%. 3. Desk review of the laboratory's proficiency testing reports from the Medical Laboratory Evaluation (MLE) confirmed the laboratory failed Hematology and hematocrit on Events 1and 2 of 2019 resulting in the first unsuccessful performance. -- 3 of 3 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - November 27, 2018

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: H34H11

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D5469

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) recertification survey was completed on November 27, 2018. The laboratory was not in compliance with applicable CLIA requirements found at 42 CFR 493.1 through 42 CFR 493.1780. The following deficiency was cited: D5469 CONTROL PROCEDURES CFR(s): 493.1256(d)(10)(g) Unless CMS Approves a procedure, specified in Appendix C of the State Operations Manual (CMS Pub. 7), that provides equivalent quality testing, the laboratory must-- Establish or verify the criteria for acceptability of all control materials. (i) When control materials providing quantitative results are used, statistical parameters (for example, mean and standard deviation) for each batch and lot number of control materials must be defined and available. (ii) The laboratory may use the stated value of a commercially assayed control material provided the stated value is for the methodology and instrumentation employed by the laboratory and is verified by the laboratory. (iii) Statistical parameters for unassayed control materials must be established over time by the laboratory through concurrent testing of control materials having previously determined statistical parameters. (g) The laboratory must document all control procedures performed. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the laboratory's 2017 and 2018 quality control (QC) records for testing performed on the Beckman Access 2 chemistry/endocrinology analyzer and the Vitros chemistry analyzer, review of the package inserts for controls used to determine analyzer performance and staff interview, the laboratory failed to establish criteria for acceptability of the controls. Findings include: 1. Review of Levey Jennings charts, BioRad Liquicheck Immunoassay Plus Control assay sheets and results of control values obtained during testing of controls on the Beckman Access 2 endocrinology/chemistry analyzer revealed the laboratory uses the 3 standard Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- deviation range given by the manufacturer on the assay sheet to determine the acceptable range of control values and has not adjusted their QC ranges to reflect the standard deviation obtained by their laboratory. Review of control values obtained by the laboratory also revealed the standard deviation calculated on testing performed in their laboratory is much lower than the values used to determine acceptability of patient results. 2. Review of Levey Jennings charts, Vitros Performance Verifier Control Assay Sheets and results of control values obtained during testing of controls on the Vitros chemistry analyzer revealed the laboratory uses the values assigned for the "range of mean values " to determine control acceptability and has not adjusted their QC ranges to reflect the values obtained by their laboratory. 3. Review of laboratory records also revealed lot numbers and generation of lot numbers of reagents, as well as lot numbers of calibrators and controls for testing performed on the Vitros chemistry analyzer change frequently which will require evaluation of control ranges be re-evaluated frequently. 4. Interview with the technical consultant and testing personnel # 2 (see CMS 209) on November 27, 2058 at 3 pm in the break room confirmed the laboratory changes lot numbers/generation of reagents, lot numbers of calibrators and controls frequently for testing performed on the Vitros Chemistry analyzer and QC values for testing performed on the Vitros and Beckman Access 2 are not reflective of the results obtained by the laboratory. -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access