Summary:
Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5217 EVALUATION OF PROFICIENCY TESTING PERFORMANCE CFR(s): 493.1236(c)(1) At least twice annually, the laboratory must verify the accuracy of any test or procedure it performs that is not included in subpart I of this part. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: D5217 Based on review of laboratory policies and procedures, laboratory proficiency testing records, lack of documentation, and interview with the technical supervisor (TS), the laboratory failed to perform bi-annual method accuracy evaluations for microscopic Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) wet mount testing from 2023 to the date of survey, 09/24/2025. Findings include: 1. Review of laboratory policies and procedures revealed the policy titled, "General Laboratory Policies", which stated, under section titled "7.Proficiency Testing", "This laboratory will enroll in formal proficiency testing appropriate to the test menu and treat all proficiency test challenge specimens the same as patient specimens." 2. Review of laboratory PT records found no documented KOH proficiency testing or bi-annual method accuracy evaluations. 3. Interview with the TS on 09/24/2025, at 9:48 am, confirmed that the laboratory was not enrolled in proficiency testing nor did the laboratory have any documented bi- annual method accuracy evaluations for KOH testing. D5291 GENERAL LABORATORY SYSTEMS QUALITY ASSESSMENT CFR(s): 493.1239(a) The laboratory must establish and follow written policies and procedures for an ongoing mechanism to monitor, assess, and, when indicated, correct problems identified in the general laboratory systems requirements specified at 493.1231 through 493.1236. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 4 -- This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: A Based on review of the laboratory's quality assessment policies and procedures, review of quality assurance records, review of proficiency testing (PT) records, and interview with the technical supervisor (TS), the laboratory failed to follow the written quality assurance policy for monitoring, assessing, and correcting problems related to PT from 2023 to the date of survey, 09/24/25. Findings Include: 1. Review of the laboratory's policy and procedure manual identified the policy, "Quality Assurance Program", stated the following: "Twice yearly review by the laboratory director or designee will be conducted for quality assurance. This will cover the quality assessment program for procedures used in this laboratory. The checklists are used to evaluate general laboratory systems, Pre-analytical systems, analytic systems, and post-analytic systems. Any discrepancy found in the checklist will be documented as a lab error form and kept I the manual for two years ... Error reporting Anytime and every time an error occurs, an error form must be filled out." 2.Review documents titled "Quality assurance (QA) annual review" signed by the laboratory director /designee on 3/21/25 and 3/15/24 did not identify issues related to PT and did not have documented