Children's Clinic, The

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

2
Total Citations
7
Total Deficiencyies
6
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 11D0257514
Address 1550 Doctors Drive, Lagrange, GA, 30240
City Lagrange
State GA
Zip Code30240
Phone706 884-2686
Lab DirectorLUCY TUMAMBING

Citation History (2 surveys)

Survey - January 11, 2023

Survey Type: Special

Survey Event ID: P25Z11

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D2130 D6016 D2016 D6000

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A proficiency testing desk review was completed on January 11, 2023. At the time of the review, the laboratory was not in compliance with the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988, 42 CFR 493.1 through 42 CFR 493.1780. The following conditions were cited: D2016 D6000 D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: The laboratory failed to maintain satisfactory proficiency testing (PT) performance 3 of 5 testing events for automated white blood cell (WBC) differential analyte in 2021 event 2, 2022 events 2 and 3, resulting in the 1st unsuccessful occurrence for WBC differential. Refer to D2130 Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- D2130 HEMATOLOGY CFR(s): 493.851(f) Failure to achieve satisfactory performance for the same analyte in two consecutive events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Casper Reports 153 and 155 and review of the laboratory's proficiency testing (PT) reports, the laboratory failed to maintain satisfactory performance in three of five testing events ( 2nd event of 2021, 2nd and 3rd events of 2022), resulting in the 1st unsuccessful occurrence for automated white blood cell differential (WBC Diff). Findings include: 1. A review of Casper Reports 153 and 155 disclosed the laboratory failed WBC Diff on the following: 2021 Event 2 WBC Diff Score 60% 2022 Event 2 WBC Diff Score 0% 2022 Event 3 WBC Diff Score 20% 4. A review of the laboratory's proficiency testing reports from American Proficiency Institute (API) confirmed the laboratory failed WBC Diff with the aforementioned scores. D6000 MODERATE COMPLEXITY LABORATORY DIRECTOR CFR(s): 493.1403 The laboratory must have a director who meets the qualification requirements of 493. 1405 of this subpart and provides overall management and direction in accordance with 493.1407 of this subpart. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: The laboratory director failed to maintain compliance with successful white blood cell differential (WBCD) proficiency testing (PT) for three of five events, resulting in the 1st unsuccessful performance for WBCD. Refer to D6016 D6016 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1407(e)(4)(i) The laboratory director is responsible for the overall operation and administration of the laboratory, including the employment of personnel who are competent to perform test procedures, and record and report test results promptly, accurate, and proficiently and for assuring compliance with the applicable regulations. (e) The laboratory director must-- (e)(4)(i) Ensure that the proficiency testing samples are tested as required under Subpart H of this part; This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Casper Reports 153 and 155 and the laboratory's proficiency testing (PT) evaluation reports, the laboratory director failed to ensure the laboratory maintained satisfactory performance for three of five proficiency testing events for the automated white blood cell differential (WBCD) resulting in the 1st unsuccessful PT occurrence for WBCD. Refer to D2130 -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - September 15, 2022

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: 3CZ011

Deficiency Tags: D2009 D0000

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) recertification survey was completed on September 15, 2022. The laboratory was not in compliance with applicable CLIA requirements found at 42 CFR 493.1 through 42 CFR 493.1780. The following deficiencies were cited: D2009 TESTING OF PROFICIENCY TESTING SAMPLES CFR(s): 493.801(b)(1) The individual testing or examining the samples and the laboratory director must attest to the routine integration of the samples into the patient workload using the laboratory's routine methods. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of American Proficiency Institute (API) profiency test (PT) records and interview with the laboratory director, the laboratory testing personnel failed to attest that PT samples were tested in the same manner as patient specimens. Findings include: 1. Review of API PT documentx of 2020 event #3, 2021 events 1, 2,3 and 2022 event #1 revealed the testing personnel failed to sign the attestation for testing events 2021 #2 and #3. 2. Interview with the lab director on 9/15/22 in the conferance room at approximately 11:30 am, confirmed the aforementioned attestations were not signed by the testing personnel. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 1 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access