Clinical Pathology Associates

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

2
Total Citations
8
Total Deficiencyies
3
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 45D2129188
Address 11111 Research Blvd Snw, Austin, TX, 78759
City Austin
State TX
Zip Code78759
Phone(512) 241-1008

Citation History (2 surveys)

Survey - October 17, 2024

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: 75FB11

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D5601 D0000 D5601

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 The laboratory was surveyed and found to be in compliance with the Conditions of the CLIA regulations found at 42 CFR 493.1 through 493.1780, and recertification is recommended. Standard level deficiencies were cited. D5601 HISTOPATHOLOGY CFR(s): 493.1273(a)(f) (a) As specified in 493.1256(e)(3), fluorescent and immunohistochemical stains must be checked for positive and negative reactivity each time of use. For all other differential or special stains, a control slide of known reactivity must be stained with each patient slide or group of patient slides. Reactions of the control slide with each special stain must be documented. (f) The laboratory must document all control procedures performed, as specified in this section. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the laboratory's policies and procedures, quality control (QC) records, test reports, presurvey paperwork, and interview, the laboratory failed to document the intended reactivity to ensure predictable staining characteristics for the Immunohistochemical (IHC) stains and Special stains for the diagnostic interpretation of histopathology specimens for one of one reports reviewed. Finding follow. A. Review of the laboratory's policy and procedure titled Microscopic Examination of Anatomic Pathology Specimens, revised 04/30/2020, under Testing Accuracy and Quality Assurance stated, "The pathologist will review the staining and slide quality each day as well as the quality of the gross. The results of this review are recorded on the CPA Daily histology and Cytology QA Log. A rating of "Good Quality" indicates the following respectively: 1 Histopathology H&E stained slides a H&E stain: i. Nuclei and basophilic structures stain blue ii. Cytoplasm acidophilic structures stain pink b. Gross quality is acceptable i. Specimen was submitted with correct measurements ii. Specimen number of pieces is acceptable iiii. No cross contamination of specimens c. Slide quality is acceptable i. Slide demonstrates tissue Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- as expected ii. No cutting artifact that impacts rendering of a diagnosis as defined by the pathologist. iii. Cover slipped appropriately 2. Cytology Papanicolaou stained slides: a. Slide Quality: i. Processing Acceptable (sufficient cellularity for diagnosis) ii. Papanicolaou stain: 1. nuclei (Chromatin) blue 2. Keratin orange 3 Cytoplasm shades of blue-green 4. Squamous cells, RBCs, nucleoli, and cilia shades of pink iii. Cover slipped appropriately 3. Special Stains/immunohistochemistry stains are assessed only when performed. a. When a special stain is performed, there will be a working control that is performed with that stain. b. The pathologist will assess the patient and control stain for quality and results. i. Stain performance is based on the results criteria outlined in the attached documents from CPA. These are maintained on location for reference for testing personnel. c. The assessment of this stain is documented in the pathology report. Language similar to the following will be used: "XX stain is performed in the presence of a(n) appropriately functioning/positive control." This statement should be interpreted as the assessment that the stain functioned as expected and is adequate for diagnosis." The policy did not address the documentation of controls for IHC and Special stains. The laboratory's practice was to document controls for the IHC and Special stains only in the test report. B. Review of the Surgical and Cytology Stain Quality Log did not have a column to record the QC for Immunohistochemical (IHC) or Special stains. C. Random review of 18 test reports from 04/29/2022 - 09/04/2024 showed 1 with IHC/special stains. One of one test reports/cases from 03/03/2023 did not include QC for the intended reactivity to ensure predictable staining characteristics for the following IHC and Special stains: Surgical Path # Date Reported IHC/Special Stain 1. AT23-001040 03/03/2023 CD3, CD20, CD10, CD21, BCL-2, BCL-6, Ki-67 D. Review of the CMS form 116 showed approximately 2890 histopathology specimens were reported annually. E. Interview with the Client Services Manager on October 17, 2024 at 1720 hours confirmed the performance of the QC for the IHC and Special stains was not recorded on a QC log. -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - July 27, 2022

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: WG7811

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D0000 D6127 D6127

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 The facility was found to be in compliance with applicable Conditions of Participation in the CLIA program, and recertification is recommended. D6127 TECHNICAL SUPERVISOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1451(b)(9) The technical supervisor is responsible for evaluating and documenting the performance of individuals responsible for high complexity testing at least semiannually during the first year the individual tests patient specimens. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of pre-survey paperwork, personnel files and interview, the technical supervisor failed to evaluate the competency at least semiannually during the first year the individual tests patient specimens for one of one new hires that performed microscopic interpretations of histopathology and cytology slides. Findings follow. Review of the pre-survey paperwork showed testing personnel #3, as listed on the CMS form 209, was hired on 10/05/2020. Review of the personnel file showed one semi-annual competency evaluation performed 12/28/2021. A second semi-annual competency evaluation was requested on July 26, 2022 at 1420 but not provided. Interview with Clinical Support Manager on July 26, 2022 at 1430 confirmed they only had one semi-competency evaluation on file for testing personnel #3, but that she may have it back at the office. Phone interview on July 27, 2022 at 1410 confirmed a second semi-annual competency evaluation was not found. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 1 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access