Summary:
Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5217 EVALUATION OF PROFICIENCY TESTING PERFORMANCE CFR(s): 493.1236(c)(1) At least twice annually, the laboratory must verify the accuracy of any test or procedure it performs that is not included in subpart I of this part. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on lack of accuracy verification documentation for review and interview with the facility personnel, the laboratory failed to verify the accuracy of testing performed under the sub-specialty of Histopathology at least twice annually during 2019 and 2020. Findings include: 1. No documentation was presented for review during the survey to indicate the laboratory verified the accuracy of diagnostic neurology testing at least twice annually during 2019 and 2020. 2. The facility personnel confirmed that the laboratory failed to verify the accuracy of diagnostic neurology testing at least twice annually during 2019 and 2020. 3. The laboratory's approximate annual test volume under the sub-specialty of Histopathology is 1,800. D5291 GENERAL LABORATORY SYSTEMS QUALITY ASSESSMENT CFR(s): 493.1239(a) The laboratory must establish and follow written policies and procedures for an ongoing mechanism to monitor, assess, and, when indicated, correct problems identified in the general laboratory systems requirements specified at 493.1231 through 493.1236. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on lack of written Quality Assessment policies and procedures and interview with the facility personnel, the laboratory failed to establish policies related to accuracy verification for histopathology testing performed by the laboratory. Findings Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- include: 1. The laboratory performs diagnostic biopsy interpretation for Neurology testing under the sub-specialty of Histopathology, with an approximate annual test volume of 1,800. 2. No documentation was presented for review during the survey to indicate the laboratory had an established policy related to the verification of accuracy process for the testing indicated above, including but not limited to, information specific to the frequency of the review, number of cases reviewed, individual or laboratory performing the review and a remedial action plan in the event of a noted discrepancy. 3. The facility personnel confirmed that the laboratory failed to have an established written policy in place at the time of the survey conducted on October 14, 2021, specific to the verification of accuracy process for histopathology testing performed by the laboratory. D5391 PREANALYTIC SYSTEMS QUALITY ASSESSMENT CFR(s): 493.1249(a) The laboratory must establish and follow written policies and procedures for an ongoing mechanism to monitor, assess, and when indicated, correct problems identified in the preanalytic systems specified at 493.1241 through 493.1242. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of patient slides and interview with the facility personnel, the laboratory failed to identify and correct issues found with labeling patient slides with the incorrect date. Findings include: 1. The laboratory performs testing in the specialty of Pathology with an approximate annual test volume of 1,800. The laboratory receives 3 separate punch biopsy specimens from each patient which are processed, stained and mounted on labeled slides for interpretation by the Neurologist. 2. It is the practice of the laboratory to label the patient slides with the unique accession number, the specimen source code and stain code, patient last name and date. 3. Review of the pathology report for case# 1061 indicated the following dates: Biopsy Date as 10/16 /2019; Date Received as 10/17/2019; and Date Reported as 11/01/2019. 4. Review of the corresponding slides for case #1061 revealed the slides were labeled with the date, 01/10/2020, which was after the final report date of 11/01/19. 5. No