Dearborn Surgery Center

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

3
Total Citations
23
Total Deficiencyies
12
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 23D1037323
Address 18100 Oakwood Blvd Suite 100, Dearborn, MI, 48124
City Dearborn
State MI
Zip Code48124
Phone(313) 253-2000

Citation History (3 surveys)

Survey - May 19, 2025

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: TWJT11

Deficiency Tags: D5028 D5203 D5403 D5473 D6076 D6082 D6076 D6082 D0000 D5028 D5203 D5403 D5473 D6093 D6106 D6093 D6106

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 . A recertification survey was performed on May 19, 2025 at Dearborn Surgery Center by the State of Michigan Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Department. During the survey, it was determined Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) existed for the following condition- level deficiencies: 493.1219 Condition: Histopathology. 493.1441 Condition: Laboratories performing high complexity testing; laboratory director. D5028 HISTOPATHOLOGY CFR(s): 493.1219 If the laboratory provides services in the subspecialty of Histopathology, the laboratory must meet the requirements specified in 493.1230 through 493.1256, 493. 1273, and 493.1281 through 493.1299. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: . Based on observation and interviews with the administrator and the laboratory director, the laboratory failed to establish written policies to ensure positive identification of its patient histopathology slides (refer to D5203), failed to establish test procedures for its frozen section histopathology testing to include the preparation of slides, performance of gross tissue examinations, and microscopic tissue examinations (refer to D5403), and failed to ensure quality control programs were established to include predictable staining characteristics for its hematoxylin and eosin staining materials at least each day of patient testing (refer to D5473). D5203 SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION AND INTEGRITY CFR(s): 493.1232 The laboratory must establish and follow written policies and procedures that ensure positive identification and optimum integrity of a patient's specimen from the time of collection or receipt of the specimen through completion of testing and reporting of results. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 5 -- This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: . Based on observation and interviews with the administrator and the laboratory director, the laboratory failed to establish written policies to ensure positive identification of its patient histopathology slides for 9 (patients) of 11 patient cases performed between 6/9/23 to 5/19/25. Findings include: 1. A review of the laboratory's test volume revealed the laboratory performed histopathology frozen sections for 11 patients between 6/9/23 to 5/19/25. Nine of the 11 patient cases had slides available for review. The slides included patient identification stickers with the name of another laboratory, laboratory B under a different CLIA certificate. These stickers overlapped the coverslip on some of the slides, showing they were added after the specimen slides were prepared. The surveyor peeled back and held the slides to the light to see what the labeling was underneath the stickers to reveal the following information: a. Patient #1, with testing performed on 6/28/23, had 10 slides prepared and read at this laboratory: i. Two slides did not include any labeling. ii. Eight slides included the case number and letters denoting the sections, "B1-1", "B1-2", "C1-1", C1-2", "D1-1", "D1-2", "E1-1", and "E1-2". iii. No name was included on the slides. b. Patient #3, with testing performed on 1/10/24, had seven slides prepared and read at this laboratory: i. Two slides did not include any labeling. ii. Five slides included letters and numbers denoting the sections, "A2-1", "A2-2", "A3-1", "A3-2", and "A3- 3". iii. No name or case number was included. c. Patient #4, with testing performed on 6/13/24, had six slides prepared and read at this laboratory: i. All six slides included letters and numbers denoting the sections, "A1/1", "A1/2", "B1/1", "B1/2", "C1/1" and "C1/2". ii. No name or case number was included. d. Patient #6, with testing performed on 7/6/23, had six slides prepared and read at this laboratory: i. Two slides did not include any labeling. ii. Four slides included the case number and letters denoting the sections "B1-1", "B1-2", "C1-1", and "C1-2". iii. No name was included. e. Patient #7, with testing performed on 6/9/23, had six slides prepared and read at this laboratory: i. Two slides did not include any labeling. ii. Four slides included the letters denoting the sections "A2-1", "A2-2", "A3-1", and "A3-2". iii. No name or case number was included. f. Patient #9, with testing performed on 2/23/24, had four slides prepared and read at this laboratory: i. Two slides did not include any labeling. ii. Two slides included the numbers denoting the sections "1-3" and 1-4". iii. No name or case number was included. g. Patient #10, with testing performed on 11/22/23, had 12 slides prepared and read at this laboratory: i. Six slides did not include any labeling. ii. Six slides included the letters denoting the sections "A3 11", "A3 12", "A4 11", "A4 12", "C 11", and "C 12". iii. No name or case number was included. h. Patient #11, with testing performed on 8/25/23, had six slides prepared and read at this laboratory: i. All six slides include the letters denoting the sections "A1-1", A1-2", "B1", "B12", "C1.1", and "C1.2". No name or case number was included. i. Patient #12, with testing performed on 10/12/23, had four slides prepared and read at this laboratory: i. Three slides included a last name and first initial with "B12", "BLL", and "F212A". No full name or case number included. ii. One slide included "F211 A" without a name or case number. 2. A review of the laboratory's "Specimen collection- Care, Handling, and Disposal" procedure revealed a lack of specimen labeling policy. 3. An interview on 5/19/25 at 2:04 pm with the administrator and the laboratory director confirmed the slides listed above were not labeled to ensure positive patient identification while the specimens were at the laboratory. The stickers on the slides were generated after the frozen section histopathology testing at the laboratory was completed and sent to reference laboratory for additional testing. D5403 PROCEDURE MANUAL -- 2 of 5 -- CFR(s): 493.1251(b) (b) The procedure manual must include the following when applicable to the test procedure: (b)(1) Requirements for patient preparation; specimen collection, labeling, storage, preservation, transportation, processing, and referral; and criteria for specimen acceptability and rejection as described in 493.1242. (b)(2) Microscopic examination, including the detection of inadequately prepared slides. (b)(3) Step-by- step performance of the procedure, including test calculations and interpretation of results. (b)(4) Preparation of slides, solutions, calibrators, controls, reagents, stains, and other materials used in testing. (b)(5) Calibration and calibration verification procedures. (b)(6) The reportable range for test results for the test system as established or verified in 493.1253. (b)(7) Control procedures. (b)(8)

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - April 3, 2023

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: FI6611

Deficiency Tags: D5607 D5607

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5607 HISTOPATHOLOGY CFR(s): 493.1273(d)(f) (d) Tissue pathology reports must be signed by an individual qualified as specified in paragraph (b) or, as appropriate, paragraph (c) of this section. If a computer report is generated with an electronic signature, it must be authorized by the individual who performed the examination and made the diagnosis. (f) The laboratory must document all control procedures performed, as specified in this section. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: . Based on record review and interview with the Laboratory Director, the laboratory failed to have frozen section tissue pathology reports signed by the individual who performed the examination for 9 (S02-21-11549- A-D, S02-21-14505 A-C, S02-22- 4696 A, B, S02-22-9529 A-C, S02-22-13006 D, E, S02-22-18173 A-C, S02-22-21145 A-D, S02-23788 A, and S02-23-1063 A-C) of 9 frozen section tissue pathology reports reviewed. Findings include: 1. A review of 9 patient frozen section tissue pathology reports revealed a lack of signature of the individual performing the examinations for the following cases reviewed: a. S02-21-11549- A-D with the date of service of 10/07/2021. b. S02-21-14505 A-C with the date of service of 11/18 /2021. c. S02-22-4696 A, B with the date of service of 03/17/2022. d. S02-22-9529 A- C with the date of service of 05/27/2022. e. S02-22-13006 D, E with the date of service of 07/21/2022. f. S02-22-18173 A-C with the date of service of 10/06/2022. g. S02-22-21145 A-D with the date of service of 11/17/2022. h. S02-23788 A with the date of service of 12/28/2022. i. S02-23-1063 A-C with the date of service of 01/19 /2023. 2. An interview on 4/3/2023 at 11:46 am with the Laboratory Director confirmed the provider performing each frozen section tissue pathology examination had their names typed in the test reports and had not had a signature or electronic signature. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 1 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - September 27, 2021

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: TOFG11

Deficiency Tags: D5217 D5805 D5217 D5805

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5217 EVALUATION OF PROFICIENCY TESTING PERFORMANCE CFR(s): 493.1236(c)(1) At least twice annually, the laboratory must verify the accuracy of any test or procedure it performs that is not included in subpart I of this part. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: . Based on record review and interview with the Laboratory Director (LD), the laboratory failed to verify the accuracy of the frozen section tissue microscopic slide examination for two of two years reviewed. Findings include: 1. Record review of the "Pathologist Diagnosis Verification" log revealed for two (9/2019 to 9/2021) of two years reviewed, the cases reviewed by the Pathologists were not the in-house frozen section cases. 2. On 9/27/2021 at 9:33 am, the surveyor requested the laboratory's verification of accuracy documentation for the frozen section slide examinations and it was not made available. 3. An interview on 9/27/2021 at 9:33 am, the LD confirmed the laboratory did not have verification of accuracy documentation for the frozen section tissue microscopic slide examinations performed in-house. D5805 TEST REPORT CFR(s): 493.1291(c) The test report must indicate the following: (c)(1) For positive patient identification, either the patient's name and identification number, or a unique patient identifier and identification number. (c)(2) The name and address of the laboratory location where the test was performed. (c)(3) The test report date. (c)(4) The test performed. (c)(5) Specimen source, when appropriate. (c)(6) The test result and, if applicable, the units of measurement or interpretation, or both. (c)(7) Any information regarding the condition and disposition of specimens that do not meet the laboratory's criteria for acceptability. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: . Based on record review and interview with the Laboratory Director (LD), the laboratory failed to include the address of the laboratory location where testing was performed on the Surgical Pathology Report and the Anatomical Pathology Reports for five of five case reports reviewed. Findings include: 1. A record review of Surgical and Anatomical Pathology Reports revealed the address was missing from the final report for five (one to five) of five reports reviewed as follows: a. Surgical Pathology Reports - address missing on report number two to four b. Anatomical Pathology Reports - address missing on report number one and five 2. An interview on 9/27 /2021 at 12:30 pm, the LD confirmed the address of the testing laboratory was not included on the final Surgical and Anatomical Pathology Reports. -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access