CLIA Laboratory Citation Details
36D0685509
Survey Type: Standard
Survey Event ID: ERO811
Deficiency Tags: D0000 D0000 D5209 D5449 D5209 D5449 D5791 D5791
Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A revisit was conducted on 05/27/2025 at Dermatologists of Southwest Ohio 36D0685509 for all previous deficiencies cited on 05/13/2025. All deficiencies have been corrected and no new noncompliance was identified. The laboratory is in compliance with the Conditions of Participation at 42 CFR Part 493, Laboratory Requirements. D5209 PERSONNEL COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT POLICIES CFR(s): 493.1235 As specified in the personnel requirements in subpart M, the laboratory must establish and follow written policies and procedures to assess employee and, if applicable, consultant competency. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and an interview with the Clinical Administrator, the laboratory failed to follow written policies and procedures to assess the competency of Testing Personnel (TP) #4 for the moderately complex potassium hydroxide (KOH) testing procedures performed in the subspecialty of Mycology. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 66 out of 66 patient KOH tests performed from 08/01/2024 through 05/13/2025. Findings Include: 1. Review of the laboratory's Form CMS-209, approved via signature and date by the Laboratory Director on 04/30/2025 and provided on the date of the inspection found one individual qualified and listed as a TP, hired on 08/01/2024, to perform KOH testing procedures. 2. Review of the laboratory's "Competency Assessment Policy" approved via signature and date by the Laboratory Director on 02/13/2018 and provided on the date of the inspection found the following: "...During the employment...a competency assessment will be performed: a. Initially b. 6 months c. Yearly..." 3. Review of the laboratory's competency assessment documentation, provided on the date of the inspection, failed to find competency assessment records for TP #4, per the written policy. 4. The inspector requested competency records for TP #4 from the Clinical Administrator. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- An interview with the Clinical Administrator confirmed that the lab failed to perform competency assessments for TP #4, per the written policy. The interview occurred on 05/13/2025 at 2:47 PM. D5449 CONTROL PROCEDURES CFR(s): 493.1256(d)(3)(ii)(g) (d)(3)(ii) Each qualitative procedure, include a negative and positive control material; This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and an interview with the Clinical Administrator, the laboratory failed to follow written policies and procedures to perform quality control (QC) each day of testing for the moderately complex potassium hydroxide (KOH) testing procedures performed in the subspecialty of Mycology for 47 out of 49 days of testing from 08/01/2024 through 05/13/2025. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 64 out of 66 patient KOH tests performed from 08/01/2024 through 05/13 /2025. Findings Include: 1. Review of the laboratory's "Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) Examination of Skin, Hair or Nails," approved via signature and date by the Laboratory Director on 02/24/2025 and provided on the date of the inspection found the following: "...Each day that is procedure is performed, a second level of sample will be provided by testing each patient specimen in duplicate..." 2. Review of the laboratory's QC documentation, provided on the date of the inspection, failed to find evidence of QC performed, per the written policy. 3. The inspector requested QC records from the Clinical Administrator. An interview with the Clinical Administrator confirmed that the lab failed to perform QC for 47 out of 49 days of patient testing, per the written policy. The interview occurred on 05/13/2025 at 2:47 PM. D5791 ANALYTIC SYSTEMS QUALITY ASSESSMENT CFR(s): 493.1289(a)(c) (a) The laboratory must establish and follow written policies and procedures for an ongoing mechanism to monitor, assess, and when indicated, correct problems identified in the analytic systems specified in 493.1251 through 493.1283. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and an interview with theClinical Administrator, the laboratory failed to follow written policies and procedures to perform quality assessment (QA) in the analytic system for the moderately complex potassium hydroxide (KOH) testing procedures performed in the subspecialty of Mycology from 08/01/2024 through 05/13/2025. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 66 out of 66 patient KOH tests performed from 08/01/2024 through 05/13/2025. Findings Include: 1. Review of the laboratory's "KOH Testing Policy and Procedure," approved via signature and date by the Laboratory Director on 02/24/2025 and provided on the date of the inspection found the following: "...A clinical staff member will do a quality assurance evaluation for at least one Scabies/KOH test per month..." 2. Review of the laboratory's QA documentation, provided on the date of the inspection, failed to find evidence of a QA evaluation performed monthly, per the written policy. 3. The inspector requested QA records for 08/01/2024 through 05/13/2025 from the Clinical Administrator. An interview with the Clinical Administrator confirmed that the lab failed to perform a QA evaluation monthly from 08/01/2024 through 05/13 /2025, per the written policy. The interview occurred on 05/13/2025 at 2:24 PM. -- 2 of 2 --
Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility
Survey Type: Standard
Survey Event ID: T7TR11
Deficiency Tags: D5403
Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5403 PROCEDURE MANUAL CFR(s): 493.1251(b) The procedure manual must include the following when applicable to the test procedure: (1) Requirements for patient preparation; specimen collection, labeling, storage, preservation, transportation, processing, and referral; and criteria for specimen acceptability and rejection as described in 493.1242. (2) Microscopic examination, including the detection of inadequately prepared slides. (3) Step-by-step performance of the procedure, including test calculations and interpretation of results. (4) Preparation of slides, solutions, calibrators, controls, reagents, stains, and other materials used in testing. (5) Calibration and calibration verification procedures. (6) The reportable range for test results for the test system as established or verified in 493.1253. (7) Control procedures. (8)
Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility
Survey Type: Standard
Survey Event ID: RU3Y11
Deficiency Tags: D6171 D5217 D6171
Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5217 EVALUATION OF PROFICIENCY TESTING PERFORMANCE CFR(s): 493.1236(c)(1) At least twice annually, the laboratory must verify the accuracy of any test or procedure it performs that is not included in subpart I of this part. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews with the Compliance Officer (CO) and Manager (M), the laboratory failed to blindly verify the accuracy of the Mohs tissue biopsy slide interpretation procedures performed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all patients tested under the subspecialty of histopathology. Findings Include: 1. Review of the laboratory's "Peer Review" policy and procedure provided on the date of the inspection approved via signature and date by the Laboratory Director on 09/10/2019 found the following statement: "...The histology technician will retrieve a blind MOHs case from the a previous month and prepare all necessary components for review. Copy current MOHS map report that shows clear margins. Blank MOHS map with only patient information Case slides" 2. Review of one out of three of the 2018 "Mohs Microscopic Surgery Operative Map" and one out of three 2019 "Mohs Microscopic Surgery Operative Map" which was sent with each case for peer review revealed that the original diagnosis and tissue map was included. 3. The CO and M confirmed the laboratory did not perform blind peer reviews for Mohs slide interpretations. The interviews occurred on 03/12/2019 at 3:15 PM. D6171 TESTING PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS CFR(s): 493.1489(b) (b) Meet one of the following requirements: (b)(1) Be a doctor of medicine, doctor of osteopathy, or doctor of podiatric medicine licensed to practice medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry in the State in which the laboratory is located or have earned a doctoral, master's or bachelor's degree in a chemical, physical, biological or clinical laboratory Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- science, or medical technology from an accredited institution; (b)(2)(i) Have earned an associate degree in a laboratory science, or medical laboratory technology from an accredited institution or-- (b)(2)(ii) Have education and training equivalent to that specified in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section that includes-- (b)(2)(ii)(A) At least 60 semester hours, or equivalent, from an accredited institution that, at a minimum, include either-- (b)(2)(ii)(A)(1) 24 semester hours of medical laboratory technology courses; or (b)(2)(ii)(A)(2) 24 semester hours of science courses that include-- (b)(2) (ii)(A)(2)(i) Six semester hours of chemistry; (b)(2)(ii)(A)(2)(ii) Six semester hours of biology; and (b)(2)(ii)(A)(2)(iii) Twelve semester hours of chemistry, biology, or medical laboratory technology in any combination; and (b)(2)(ii)(B) Have laboratory training that includes either of the following: (b)(2)(ii)(B)(1) Completion of a clinical laboratory training program approved or accredited by the ABHES, the CAHEA, or other organization approved by HHS. (This training may be included in the 60 semester hours listed in paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(A) of this section.) (b)(2)(ii)(B)(2) At least 3 months documented laboratory training in each specialty in which the individual performs high complexity testing. (b)(3) Have previously qualified or could have qualified as a technologist under 493.1491 on or before February 28, 1992; (b) (4) On or before April 24, 1995 be a high school graduate or equivalent and have either-- (b)(4)(i) Graduated from a medical laboratory or clinical laboratory training program approved or accredited by ABHES, CAHEA, or other organization approved by HHS; or (b)(4)(ii) Successfully completed an official U.S. military medical laboratory procedures training course of at least 50 weeks duration and have held the military enlisted occupational specialty of Medical Laboratory Specialist (Laboratory Technician); (b)(5)(i) Until September 1, 1997-- (b)(5)(i)(A) Have earned a high school diploma or equivalent; and (b)(5)(i)(B) Have documentation of training appropriate for the testing performed before analyzing patient specimens. Such training must ensure that the individual has-- (b)(5)(i)(B)(1) The skills required for proper specimen collection, including patient preparation, if applicable, labeling, handling, preservation or fixation, processing or preparation, transportation and storage of specimens; (b)(5)(i)(B)(2) The skills required for implementing all standard laboratory procedures; (b)(5)(i)(B)(3) The skills required for performing each test method and for proper instrument use; (b)(5)(i)(B)(4) The skills required for performing preventive maintenance, troubleshooting, and calibration procedures related to each test performed; (b)(5)(i)(B)(5) A working knowledge of reagent stability and storage; (b)(5)(i)(B)(6) The skills required to implement the quality control policies and procedures of the laboratory; (b)(5)(i)(B)(7) An awareness of the factors that influence test results; and (b)(5)(i)(B)(8) The skills required to assess and verify the validity of patient test results through the evaluation of quality control values before reporting patient test results; and (b)(5)(i)(B)(8)(ii) As of September 1, 1997, be qualified under 493.1489(b)(1), (b)(2), or (b)(4), except for those individuals qualified under paragraph (b)(5)(i) of this section who were performing high complexity testing on or before April 24, 1995; (b)(6) For blood gas analysis-- (b)(6) (i) Be qualified under 493.1489(b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(3), (b)(4), or (b)(5); (b)(6)(ii) Have earned a bachelor's degree in respiratory therapy or cardiovascular technology from an accredited institution; or (b)(6)(iii) Have earned an associate degree related to pulmonary function from an accredited institution; or (b)(7) For histopathology, meet the qualifications of 493.1449 (b) or (l) to perform tissue examinations. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and an interview with the manager, the laboratory failed to ensure Testing Personnel (TP) met the high complexity TP qualification requirements for inking and grossing procedures. This deficient practice had the potential to affect -- 2 of 3 -- all patients tested under the subspecialty of histopathology. Findings Include: 1. Review of the laboratory's CMS-209 form, approved and signed by the Laboratory Director on 09/26/2019, found TP#5 listed and certified by the Laboratory Director to perform high complexity test procedures. 2. Review of 2018 and 2019 annual competency assessment documents approved by the Laboratory Director via signature and date for TP#5 titled "Yearly Competency Evaluation for Histology Technician" found the following statement: "...Receive, log (in the MOHS logbook), and process, bisect when necessary, relax cut, ink and map" 3. Review of education documentation revealed TP#5 possessed a high school diploma from May 1981 which does not meet the minimum TP qualifications for high complexity testing procedures listed on the 2018 and 2019 annual competency assessments. 4. The manager confirmed TP#5 was performing high complexity grossing procedures. The interview occurred 09/11/2019 at 2:00 PM. -- 3 of 3 --
Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility