Drs Ford & Rothman, Ctr For Cosmetic & Clinical

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

3
Total Citations
7
Total Deficiencyies
4
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 21D0922822
Address 18310 Montgomery Village Avenue #700, Gaithersburg, MD, 20879
City Gaithersburg
State MD
Zip Code20879
Phone(301) 977-2070

Citation History (3 surveys)

Survey - June 26, 2024

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: CJRN11

Deficiency Tags: D0000

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 The laboratory is in compliance with the regulatory requirements of 42 CFR 493 for Medicare/Medicaid-approved and CLIA-certified laboratories. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 1 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - December 16, 2022

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: L34O11

Deficiency Tags: D5401 D5805 D5401 D5805

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5401 PROCEDURE MANUAL CFR(s): 493.1251(a) A written procedures manual for all tests, assays, and examinations performed by the laboratory must be available to, and followed by, laboratory personnel. Textbooks may supplement but not replace the laboratory's written procedures for testing or examining specimens. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on standard operating procedure manual (SOPM) and record review and interview with the laboratory staff, the laboratory did not follow written procedures for performing quality checks on potassium hydroxide (KOH) used to detect dermatophytes in skin scrapings. Findings: 1. The procedure "KOH Procedure," "Quality Control" in the SOPM states, "the 20% KOH will be examined semi- annually for contamination." 2. A review of "KOH/Scabies/Nail Fungus Test Logs" from January 2021 through December 2022 showed that results of the KOH contamination checks were logged 0 of 2 times in 2021 and 1 of 2 times in 2022. 3. During an interview on 12/16/2022 at 10:15 AM, the laboratory staff confirmed that the laboratory did not document the quality checks as stated in the SOPM. D5805 TEST REPORT CFR(s): 493.1291(c) The test report must indicate the following: (c)(1) For positive patient identification, either the patient's name and identification number, or a unique patient identifier and identification number. (c)(2) The name and address of the laboratory location where the test was performed. (c)(3) The test report date. (c)(4) The test performed. (c)(5) Specimen source, when appropriate. (c)(6) The test result and, if applicable, the units of measurement or interpretation, or both. (c)(7) Any information regarding the Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- condition and disposition of specimens that do not meet the laboratory's criteria for acceptability. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of final patient reports in the laboratory information system, and interview with the vice president of technical processing, the laboratory failed to ensure that the final test report included the correct address of the laboratory where histopathology slides are interpreted. Findings: 1. The laboratory moved to its new location in July of 2022. A final patient report reviewed from November 2022 still had the old address listed on the final report. 2. During an interview on 12/16/2022 at 11:25 AM, the vice president of technical processing confirmed that the name and address of the laboratory where histopathology slides are interpreted was not correctly documented on patient final reports. -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - June 14, 2018

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: Y44511

Deficiency Tags: D5217 D5217

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5217 EVALUATION OF PROFICIENCY TESTING PERFORMANCE CFR(s): 493.1236(c)(1) At least twice annually, the laboratory must verify the accuracy of any test or procedure it performs that is not included in subpart I of this part. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview with the laboratory director, the laboratory did not have a written policy describing the system used for verifying the accuracy and reliability of interpretation of the histopathology specimens for which proficiency samples are not available. Findings: 1. The procedure did not have a written policy for evaluating the proficiency of the testing personnel at least twice a year. 2. On 06/14 /18 at 2:15 PM the laboratory director confirmed that the procedure did not have a written policy for evaluating the proficiency of the testing personnel at least twice a year. 3. The procedure should include, but is not limited to: the details of whom the samples will be exchanged with; how often samples will be exchanged; what the acceptable limits of the comparison and remedial actions to be taken when the results are not within acceptable limits. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 1 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access