Dublin Hematology & Oncology Care Pc

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

3
Total Citations
10
Total Deficiencyies
8
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 11D0992000
Address 207 Fairview Park Drive - Dublin, Dublin, GA, 31021
City Dublin
State GA
Zip Code31021
Phone478 353-5700
Lab DirectorMARCO AYULO

Citation History (3 surveys)

Survey - February 24, 2026

Survey Type: Special

Survey Event ID: CG8E11

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D2130 D6000 D2016 D6016

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A proficiency testing desk review was completed on February 24, 2026. At the time of the review, the laboratory was not in compliance with the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988, 42 CFR 493.1 through 42 CFR 493.1780. The following condition deficiencies were cited: D2016 - 42 CFR 493.803 Condition: Successful participation [proficiency testing] D6000 - 42 CFR 493.1403 Condition: Moderate Complex Laboratory Director D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the CASPER 155 report and review of the American Proficiency Institute (API) reports, the laboratory failed to maintain satisfactory proficiency Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- testing (PT) participation for Red Blood Cell (RBC) in 2025 event 1 and 2025 event 3, resulting in an initial unsuccessful participation for RBC. Refer to D 2130 D2130 HEMATOLOGY CFR(s): 493.851(f) (f) Failure to achieve satisfactory performance for the same analyte in two consecutive events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) CASPER 155 report and review of American Proficiency Institute (API) reports, the laboratory failed to maintain satisfactory participation in two of three testing events ( 1st & 3rd events of 2025), resulting in an initial unsuccessful participation for RBC. Findings: 1. A review of Casper Report 155 revealed the laboratory failed RBC on the following: 2025 Event 1 RBC Score 40% 2025 Event 3 RBC Score 0% 2. A review of the laboratory's API Reports confirmed the laboratory failed RBC with the aforementioned scores. D6000 MODERATE COMPLEXITY LABORATORY DIRECTOR CFR(s): 493.1403 The laboratory must have a director who meets the qualification requirements of 493. 1405 of this subpart and provides overall management and direction in accordance with 493.1407 of this subpart. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the CMS CASPER 155 report and review of American Proficiency Institute (API) reports, the laboratory director failed to provide overall management and direction for proficiency testing performance. The laboratory director failed to ensure proficiency testing samples were tested as required. Refer to D D6016 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1407(e)(4)(i) (e)(4)(i) The proficiency testing samples are tested as required under Subpart H of this part; This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the CMS CASPER Report 155 and the American Proficiency Institute (API) 2025 events 1 & 3 PT evaluation reports, the laboratory director failed to ensure successful proficiency testing performance for RBC in two out of three testing events ( 2025 events 1 and 3), resulting in the initial unsuccessful participation for RBC. -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - February 10, 2022

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: CYQ311

Deficiency Tags: D5203 D0000

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) Recertification survey was completed on Februry 10, 2022. The laboratory was not in compliance with applicable CLIA requirements found at 42 CFR 493.1 through 42 CFR 493.1780. The following deficiencies were cited: D5203 SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION AND INTEGRITY CFR(s): 493.1232 The laboratory must establish and follow written policies and procedures that ensure positive identification and optimum integrity of a patient's specimen from the time of collection or receipt of the specimen through completion of testing and reporting of results. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the procedure for proper labeling of samples, laboratory tour, and staff interview, the laboratory failed to properly label specimens for testing on the Abbott Cell-Dyn Emerald (Emerald), Hematology analyzer. Findings: 1. Observed during the lab tour, 10 sample tubes were placed in a rack after running the samples through the Emerald. The tubes were only labeled with the patient's first and last name. 2. Review of the procedure for labeling specimens for hematology, from the Operator's Manual for the Emerald, states that all samples should be labeled with patient's name, date of birth, MR number, and doctors name. 3. Interview with staff #2, and office manager, on 02/10/2022, at appoximately 12 pm in the laboratory, confirmed the aforementioned statements. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 1 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - September 3, 2019

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: DZ0711

Deficiency Tags: D2015 D0000 D6018

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) Recertification survey was completed on September 3, 2019. The laboratory was not in compliance with applicable CLIA requirements found at 42 CFR 493.1 through 42 CFR 493.1780. The following deficiencies were cited: D2015 TESTING OF PROFICIENCY TESTING SAMPLES CFR(s): 493.801(b)(5)(6) (5) The laboratory must document the handling, preparation, processing, examination, and each step in the testing and reporting of results for all proficiency testing samples. The laboratory must maintain a copy of all records, including a copy of the proficiency testing program report forms used by the laboratory to record proficiency testing results including the attestation statement provided by the PT program, signed by the analyst and the laboratory director, documenting that proficiency testing samples were tested in the same manner as patient specimens, for a minimum of two years from the date of the proficiency testing event. (6) PT is required for only the test system, assay, or examination used as the primary method for patient testing during the PT event. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the American Proficiency Institute(API) Proficiency testing (PT) documents for Hematology, and staff interview, the laboratory failed to provide signed attestation statements signed by the Laboratory Director (LD). Findings: 1. A review of the API PT documents for 2018 and 2019 Hematology revealed that the LD did not sign attestation statements for the first or second events in 2018. The first and second events for 2019 also failed to include the signature by the laboratory director. 2. Interview with the office manager and staff # 4 (CMS form 209) on September 3, 2019 at approximately 4 pm in the Laboratory, confirmed that the aforementioned attestation documents were not signed by the LD. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- D6018 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1407(e)(4)(iii) The laboratory director is responsible for the overall operation and administration of the laboratory, including the employment of personnel who are competent to perform test procedures, and record and report test results promptly, accurate, and proficiently and for assuring compliance with the applicable regulations. (e) The laboratory director must-- (e)(4)(iii) Ensure that all proficiency testing reports received are reviewed by the appropriate staff to evaluate the laboratory's performance and to identify any problems that require

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access