Duly Health And Care Hinsdale Derm

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

2
Total Citations
4
Total Deficiencyies
4
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 14D1088081
Address 40 S Clay St, Ste Ll30, Hinsdale, IL, 60521
City Hinsdale
State IL
Zip Code60521
Phone(630) 469-9200

Citation History (2 surveys)

Survey - February 21, 2025

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: ZDAP11

Deficiency Tags: D2007 D5221 D5407

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D2007 TESTING OF PROFICIENCY TESTING SAMPLES CFR(s): 493.801(b)(1) (b)(1) The samples must be examined or tested with the laboratory's regular patient workload by personnel who routinely perform the testing in the laboratory, using the laboratory's routine methods. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: a) Based on review of laboratory policies and procedures, the CMS-209 (Laboratory Personnel Report) Form, American Proficiency Institute (API) proficiency testing (PT) records, and interviews with laboratory representatives (LR), the laboratory failed to ensure all testing personnel (TP) who routinely perform microscopic potassium hydroxide (KOH) testing in the subspecialty of mycology participated in six of six PT events reviewed. Findings include: 1) Review of laboratory policies and procedures revealed the policy, "Derm Lab Quality Assessment Policy", which stated, under "Policy", "6. Each Physician and Mid-Level Practitioner will participate in the rotation for proficiency testing per the Proficiency Testing Policy." 2) Review of laboratory policies and procedures revealed the policy, "Derm Lab Proficiency Testing Policy", which stated, under "1. KOH Proficiency Testing", "The providers will rotate so that every test event will be completed by a different provider." 3) Review of the CMS-209 (Laboratory Personnel Report) Form revealed four TP (TP #1-4) performing microscopic KOH testing. 4) Review of API PT records for microscopic KOH testing in 2023 and 2024 found that three of four TP listed on CMS- 209 had not participated in microscopic KOH challenges. Event: Year: TP: 1 2023 1 2 2023 1 3 2023 1 1 2024 1 2 2024 1 3 2024 1 5) Interviews with LR #1 and LR #2 on 02/21/2025, at 12:34 pm, confirmed the laboratory failed to ensure all TP who routinely perform microscopic KOH testing participated in six of six PT events reviewed. b) Based on review of laboratory policies and procedures, the CMS-209 (Laboratory Personnel Report) Form, College of American Pathologists (CAP) proficiency testing (PT) records, and interviews with laboratory representatives (LR), Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- the laboratory failed to ensure all testing personnel (TP) who routinely perform microscopic scabies testing in the subspecialty of parasitology participated in five of five PT events reviewed. Findings include: 1) Review of laboratory policies and procedures revealed the policy, "Derm Lab Quality Assessment Policy", which stated, under "Policy", "6. Each Physician and Mid-Level Practitioner will participate in the rotation for proficiency testing per the Proficiency Testing Policy." 2) Review of laboratory policies and procedures revealed the policy, "Derm Lab Proficiency Testing Policy", which stated, under "2. Scabies Proficiency Testing", "The providers will rotate so that every test event will be completed by a different provider." 3) Review of the CMS-209 (Laboratory Personnel Report) Form revealed four TP (TP #1-4) performing microscopic scabies testing. 4) Review of CAP PT records for microscopic scabies testing in 2023 through the survey date of 02/21/2025 found that three of four TP listed on the CMS-209 had not participated in microscopic scabies challenges. Event: Year: TP: 1 2023 2 2 2023 2 1 2024 2 2 2024 2 1 2025 2 5) Interviews with LR #1 and LR #2 on 02/21/2025, at 12:34 pm, confirmed the laboratory failed to ensure all TP who routinely perform microscopic scabies testing participated in five of five PT events reviewed. D5221 EVALUATION OF PROFICIENCY TESTING PERFORMANCE CFR(s): 493.1236(d) All proficiency testing evaluation and verification activities must be documented. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of laboratory policies and procedures, laboratory records, lack of documentation, and interviews with laboratory representatives (LR), the laboratory failed to evaluate results of bi-annual method accuracy (proficiency testing/peer reviewed histopathology interpretations) for eight of eight events in 2023 and 2024 in the subspecialty of histopathology. Findings include: 1) Review of laboratory policies and procedures revealed the policy, " Derm Lab Proficiency Testing Policy", which stated, a) Under "Policy", "Personnel will rotate completing the proficiency but review the results of each event." b) Under "1. [Histopathology] Proficiency Testing (Slide Review) ....Histologic Interpretation Criteria", "The interpretation of the slides in evaluated ...." 2) Review of laboratory records revealed a lack of documentation of evaluations of results upon receipt of peer reviewed histopathology interpretations for eight of eight reviewed bi-annual method accuracy events. Year: Event: 2023 Q1 2023 Q2 2023 Q3 2023 Q4 2024 Q1 2024 Q2 2024 Q3 2024 Q4 3) Interviews with LR #1 and LR #2 on 02/21/2025, at 09:45 am, confirmed laboratory failed to evaluate results of bi-annual method accuracy (proficiency testing/peer reviewed histopathology interpretations) for eight of eight events in 2023 and 2024. D5407 PROCEDURE MANUAL CFR(s): 493.1251(d) (d) Procedures and changes in procedures must be approved, signed, and dated by the current laboratory director before use. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of laboratory policies and procedures, lack of documentation, and interviews with laboratory representatives (LR), the laboratory failed to have policy and procedure manuals reviewed, approved, signed, and dated by the laboratory -- 2 of 3 -- director (LD), as noted on the CMS-209 (Laboratory Personnel Report) Form, for four of four standard operating procedures in the subspecialty of histopathology. Findings include: 1) Review of laboratory policies and procedures revealed no LD approval, including signature and date, by the LD for four of four histopathology standard operating procedures: a. "Specimen Collection, Handling and Transport Guidelines", b. "Quality Assurance Plan", c. "Transferring Laboratory Materials for Consultation and Continuity of Care", d. "Results Reporting" 2) Interviews with LR #1 and LR #2 on 02/21/2025, at 11:03 am, confirmed laboratory failed to have policy and procedure manuals reviewed, approved, signed, and dated by the laboratory director (LD) in the subspecialty of histopathology. -- 3 of 3 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - February 20, 2019

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: W7LG11

Deficiency Tags: D5203

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5203 SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION AND INTEGRITY CFR(s): 493.1232 The laboratory must establish and follow written policies and procedures that ensure positive identification and optimum integrity of a patient's specimen from the time of collection or receipt of the specimen through completion of testing and reporting of results. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of laboratory policies, procedures, records and interview with the practice manager; the laboratory failed to establish and follow written policies and procedures that ensure positive identification and optimum integrity of patient's specimens from the time of collection or receipt of the specimen through completion of testing and reporting of results. Findings include: 1. Review of laboratory policies and procedures revealed that the laboratory refers slides for both Intra-departmental and external- departmental consultations. For both, laboratory policies and procedures instruct personnel to send pathology slides to a pathologist. 2. Review of patients' electronic medical records revealed that the referring physician noted specimen referrals in the progress notes. There was no documentation to show the identification of the specimen slides that were sent for referrals (consults). The referring physician only referred to patients' CPT Code 88305 which was documented on all patients' requisitions as the request for processing tissue specimens. 3. At 12:00 pm on 02/20 /19, the practice manager confirmed the surveyor's findings. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 1 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access