El Dorado Clinic

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

2
Total Citations
2
Total Deficiencyies
2
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 17D0451007
Address 700 W Central, Ste 205, El Dorado, KS, 67042
City El Dorado
State KS
Zip Code67042
Phone(316) 321-2010

Citation History (2 surveys)

Survey - February 15, 2024

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: M5UO11

Deficiency Tags: D5211

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5211 EVALUATION OF PROFICIENCY TESTING PERFORMANCE CFR(s): 493.1236(a) The laboratory must review and evaluate the results obtained on proficiency testing performed as specified in subpart H of this part. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of proficiency testing (PT) records from Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene (WSLH), lack of evaluation documentation, and interview with the technical consultant (TC), the laboratory failed to evaluate proficiency testing results for three of six testing events in 2023. Findings: 1. The surveyor requested evaluation documentation for PT results from WSLH. No evaluation documentation was provided at the time of survey for the following events: a. 2023 Hematology 2 b. 2023 Misc QA POC 2 c. 2023 Chem/Endo/Tx 3 2. Interview with the TC on 2/15/24 at 3 p.m. confirmed, the laboratory failed to evaluate proficiency testing results for three of six testing events in 2023. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 1 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - July 15, 2020

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: S00O11

Deficiency Tags: D5439

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5439 CALIBRATION AND CALIBRATION VERIFICATION CFR(s): 493.1255(b) Unless otherwise specified in this subpart, for each applicable test system the laboratory must do the following: Perform and document calibration verification procedure - (b)(1) Following the manufacturer's calibration verification instructions; (b)(2) Using the criteria verified or established by the laboratory under 493.1253(b)(3) -- (b)(2)(i) Including the number, type, and concentration of the materials, as well as acceptable limits for calibration verification; and (b)(2)(ii) Including at least a minimal (or zero) value, a mid-point value, and a maximum value near the upper limit of the range to verify the laboratory's reportable range of test results for the test system; and (b)(3) At least once every 6 months and whenever any of the following occur: (b)(3)(i) A complete change of reagents for a procedure is introduced, unless the laboratory can demonstrate that changing reagent lot numbers does not affect the range used to report patient test results, and control values are not adversely affected by reagent lot number changes. (b)(3)(ii) There is major preventive maintenance or replacement of critical parts that may influence test performance. (b)(3)(iii) Control materials reflect an unusual trend or shift, or are outside of the laboratory's acceptable limits, and other means of assessing and correcting unacceptable control values fail to identify and correct the problem. (b)(3)(iv) The laboratory's established schedule for verifying the reportable range for patient test results requires more frequent calibration verification. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: A review of calibration verification records for the Abbott Cell-Dyn Emerald analyzer, and interview with staff revealed that the laboratory failed to perform calibration verification once every six months. One of two calibration verifications were performed in 2019 on the Cell-Dyn Emerald analyzer. Finding were as follows 1. Review of the Abbott Cell-Dyn Emerald verification documentation revealed the laboratory failed to perform calibration verification at least once every six months. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- The laboratory performed a calibration verification on May 2, 2019 but failed to perform the calibration verification that was due in November 2019. A calibration verification for March 11,2020 was performed. 2. Interview with the technical consultant #2 confirmed that only one of the two required calibration verification was performed in 2019 for the Abbott Cell-Dyn Emerald analyzer. -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access