Elite Dermatology

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

3
Total Citations
20
Total Deficiencyies
8
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 45D2172775
Address 20326 Tomball Parkway, Suite #400, Houston, TX, 77070
City Houston
State TX
Zip Code77070
Phone(281) 501-5599

Citation History (3 surveys)

Survey - February 20, 2025

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: 3BZG11

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D5417 D0000 D5417

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 An announced survey of the laboratory was conducted on 02/20/2025. The laboratory was found in compliance with applicable CLIA regulations (42 CFR Part 493, Requirements for Laboratories) for the specialties/subspecialties for which it was surveyed. STANDARD LEVEL DEFICIENCIES were cited. D5417 TEST SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, REAGENT CFR(s): 493.1252(d) (d) Reagents, solutions, culture media, control materials, calibration materials, and other supplies must not be used when they have exceeded their expiration date, have deteriorated, or are of substandard quality. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on surveyor's observations, review of laboratory's annual test volumes and staff interview, the laboratory failed to ensure four of five marking dyes used for Mohs procedures were not used after exceeding their expiration date. Findings included: 1. Surveyor's observations on 02/20/2025 at 0905 hours in the laboratory revealed the following marking dyes used for laboratory procedures exceeded their expiration date: Avantik Green Tissue Marking Dye Lot: 151409 Expired: 2024-11-30 Avantik Blue Tissue Marking Dye Lot: 156628 Expired: 2024-08-31 Avantik Red Tissue Marking Dye Lot: 159204 Expired: 2024-10-31 Avantik Black Tissue Marking Dye Lot: 157822 Expired: 2024-09-30 2. Review of laboratory's submitted annual test volumes revealed the laboratory performed approximately 500 test procedures annually. 3. In an interview on 02/20/2025 at 0910 hours in the laboratory, the laboratory's Chief Operating Officer (as indicated on submitted Entrance/Exit Conference document) confirmed the findings. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 1 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - April 11, 2023

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: M64E11

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D5221 D5609 D5785 D0000 D5221 D5609 D5785

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 The laboratory was found out of compliance with applicable CLIA regulations (42 CFR Part 493, Requirements for Laboratories). The facility representative was given an opportunity to provide evidence of compliance with the noted deficiencies, and no such evidence was provided prior to survey exit. Noted deficiencies and plans of correction were discussed with the laboratory representative(s) at the exit conference. The facility was found in compliance with applicable CLIA conditions, and recertification is recommended. Note: The CMS-2567 (Statement of Deficiencies) is an official, legal document. All information must remain unchanged except for entering the

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - August 13, 2021

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: 3ZIQ11

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D0000 D5217 D5291 D6102 D5217 D5291 D6102

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 Noted deficiencies and plans of correction were discussed with the laboratory representative(s) at the exit conference. The facility representative(s) were given an opportunity to provide evidence of compliance with the noted deficiencies, and no such evidence was provided prior to survey exit. The facility was found to be in compliance with applicable Conditions of Participation in the CLIA program, and recertification is recommended. D5217 EVALUATION OF PROFICIENCY TESTING PERFORMANCE CFR(s): 493.1236(c)(1) At least twice annually, the laboratory must verify the accuracy of any test or procedure it performs that is not included in subpart I of this part. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the laboratory's policy, laboratory proficiency testing (PT) records from 2020 to 2021, and confirmed in an interview revealed the laboratory failed to have documentation of 1 of 2 twice annual accuracy assessments for Mohs slide interpretations in 2020. Findings: 1. Review of the laboratory's Proficiency Policy "MOHS MICROGRAPHIC SURGERY SKIN SPECIMENS" revealed "Semi- annually, the tech or Risk Manager will send two cases containing the original slides,..." 2. Review of the PT records from 2020-2021 revealed 1 of 2 accuracy assessment in 2020. No documentation was found of the first annual accuracy assessment. 3. An interview with the practice manager on 8/13/21 at 11:45 am in the breakroom confirmed the laboratory missed 1 accuracy assessment in 2020. D5291 GENERAL LABORATORY SYSTEMS QUALITY ASSESSMENT CFR(s): 493.1239(a) The laboratory must establish and follow written policies and procedures for an ongoing mechanism to monitor, assess, and, when indicated, correct problems Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- identified in the general laboratory systems requirements specified at 493.1231 through 493.1236. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the laboratory's policy, proficiency test (PT) records from 2020 to 2021, and confirmed in an interview revealed the laboratory failed to evaluate 3 of 3 accuracy assessments in 2020 and 2021. The findings were: 1. Review of the laboratory's Proficiency Policy "MOHS MICROGRAPHIC SURGERY SKIN SPECIMENS" revealed "Upon receipt of the pathology report from the Dermatopathologist, diagnosis of the slide specimen will be matched to the in-house diagnosis by the physician." 2. Review of laboratory accuracy assessment PT records revealed the laboratory performed accuracy assessments on December, 2020, June, 2021, and August, 2021. 3. Review of the accuracy assessment PT records revealed the laboratory had no documentation of evaluation 3 of 3 accuracy assessment PT in 2020 and 2021. 4. An interview with the practice manager on 8/13/21 at 11:45 am in the breakroom confirmed the laboratory had no documentation of accuracy assessment evaluation. D6102 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1445(e)(12) The laboratory director must ensure that prior to testing patients' specimens, all personnel have the appropriate education and experience, receive the appropriate training for the type and complexity of the services offered, and have demonstrated that they can perform all testing operations reliably to provide and report accurate results. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the laboratory's submitted CMS 209 form, the laboratory's policy, testing personnel (TP) initial training records in 2020, and confirmed in an interview revealed the laboratory failed to have documentation of initial training for 1 of 2 testing personnel (TP) for Mohs testing. The findings were: 1. Review of the laboratory's submitted CMS 209 form revealed the the laboratory identified 2 testing personnel performing high complexity testing- grossing of histology specimens for MOHS testing. 2. Review of the laboratory's policy "TRAINING AND INFORMATION" revealed "Initial training will be done by a qualified Histology /Mohs Technician." 3. Review of testing personnel's initial training records revealed no documentation for 1 of 2 testing personnel (TP) initial training in 2020. TP#2 Hired date: 3/20/2020 4. An interview with the practice manager on 8/13/21 at 11:45 am in the breakroom confirmed the above findings. -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access