Forefront Dermatology, Sc Dba Arizona

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

2
Total Citations
8
Total Deficiencyies
7
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 03D1048563
Address 830 Ainsworth Dr, Prescott, AZ, 86301
City Prescott
State AZ
Zip Code86301
Phone(928) 777-5800

Citation History (2 surveys)

Survey - February 6, 2020

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: ET1W11

Deficiency Tags: D5217 D5473 D5401 D5805

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5217 EVALUATION OF PROFICIENCY TESTING PERFORMANCE CFR(s): 493.1236(c)(1) At least twice annually, the laboratory must verify the accuracy of any test or procedure it performs that is not included in subpart I of this part. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on lack of accuracy verification documentation for review and interview with the facility personnel, the laboratory failed to verify the accuracy of histopathology testing at least twice annually during 2019. Findings include: 1. The laboratory performs patient testing under the sub-specialty of Histopathology, with an approximate annual test volume of 2,500. The laboratory began biopsy interpretations in December 2018. 2. No documentation was presented for review during the survey conducted on February 6, 2020 to indicate the laboratory verified the accuracy of biopsy interpretations at least twice annually during 2019. 3. The facility personnel confirmed that the laboratory failed to produce evidence of accuracy verifications for biopsy interpretations that were performed in 2019. D5401 PROCEDURE MANUAL CFR(s): 493.1251(a) A written procedures manual for all tests, assays, and examinations performed by the laboratory must be available to, and followed by, laboratory personnel. Textbooks may supplement but not replace the laboratory's written procedures for testing or examining specimens. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on lack of a written procedure for review and interview with the facility personnel, the laboratory failed to have a written procedure for testing performed Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- under the sub-specialty of histopathology. Findings include: 1. The laboratory performs dermatopathology testing, including Mohs and the interpretation of biopsies, with an approximate annual test volume of 2,500. 2. No documentation was presented for review to indicate the laboratory has a written procedure for biopsy testing. The laboratory began testing for the interpretation of biopsies in December 2018. 3. The facility personnel confirmed that the laboratory did not have an established written procedure for biopsy interpretation. D5473 CONTROL PROCEDURES CFR(s): 493.1256(e)(2)(g) (e) For reagent, media, and supply checks, the laboratory must do the following: (e) (2) Each day of use (unless otherwise specified in this subpart), test staining materials for intended reactivity to ensure predictable staining characteristics. Control materials for both positive and negative reactivity must be included, as appropriate. (g) The laboratory must document all control procedures performed. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on lack of Quality Control (QC) documentation and interview with the facility personnel, the laboratory failed to document the acceptability of staining materials used for testing performed in the sub-specialty of histopathology. Findings include: 1. The laboratory performs testing in the sub-specialty of Histopathology, with an approximate annual test volume of 2,500. 2. No documentation of the Hematoxylin & Eosin (H & E) stain acceptability was presented for review for testing that occurred on 07/10/2018 and 07/11/2018. Approximately 17 patients were tested on those dates. 3. The facility personnel confirmed that the laboratory evaluated the H & E stain acceptability each day prior to testing patients but failed to document the stain acceptability on the dates indicated above. D5805 TEST REPORT CFR(s): 493.1291(c) The test report must indicate the following: (c)(1) For positive patient identification, either the patient's name and identification number, or a unique patient identifier and identification number. (c)(2) The name and address of the laboratory location where the test was performed. (c)(3) The test report date. (c)(4) The test performed. (c)(5) Specimen source, when appropriate. (c)(6) The test result and, if applicable, the units of measurement or interpretation, or both. (c)(7) Any information regarding the condition and disposition of specimens that do not meet the laboratory's criteria for acceptability. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of patient test reports and interview with the facility personnel, the laboratory failed to include on the biopsy test report the laboratory address where the testing was performed. Findings include: 1. The laboratory performs patient testing in the subspecialty of histopathology with an approximate annual test volume of 8,884. The laboratory began interpreting biopsies in December 2018. 2. During the survey conducted on February 06, 2020, review of patient test report (AP20200000017) indicated a facility address that is not associated with CLIA# 03D1048563. The address listed on the biopsy test report was 18325 N. Allied Way, Phoenix, AZ 85054. The address listed in the CMS CLIA database at the time of the survey for CLIA# -- 2 of 3 -- 03D1048563 was 830 Ainsworth Dr., Prescott, AZ 86301. 3. The facility personnel confirmed that the laboratory address was not correct on the test report referenced above. -- 3 of 3 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - February 22, 2018

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: 0ZFU11

Deficiency Tags: D5217 D5433 D5203 D5293

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5203 SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION AND INTEGRITY CFR(s): 493.1232 The laboratory must establish and follow written policies and procedures that ensure positive identification and optimum integrity of a patient's specimen from the time of collection or receipt of the specimen through completion of testing and reporting of results. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the laboratory's Mohs log, review of patient slides and electronic test report and interview with the facility personnel, the laboratory failed to follow established procedures to ensure positive identification of patient's dermatopathology specimens. Findings include: 1. The laboratory performs Mohs testing under the sub- specialty of histopathology, with an approximate annual test volume of 3,000. It is the practice of the laboratory to assign a unique case number to each patient specimen. The unique case number is included on the Mohs log, Mohs map, patient slide(s) and the patient's electronic test report. 2. The laboratory's established policy titled, "Quality Assessment Procedures" states that, "All QA records such as logs of test requisitions, test reports, and receipt and QA of reagents and culture media that have not been reviewed previously will be reviewed by the Laboratory Director or an appropriate, designated staff member every six months". 3. Review of the Mohs log, Mohs map and patient slides for patient# 86764 for testing performed on 12/04/2017 indicated the Mohs case number as P17M-759, while the electronic test report indicated the case number as P17M-754. 4. No Quality Assessment documentation was presented for review during the survey to indicate the laboratory followed their established procedures by reviewing test reports and identifying errors as indicated above, to ensure positive identification and optimum integrity of each patient's specimen throughout the entire test process. 5. The facility personnel confirmed that Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- the Mohs case number was entered incorrectly into the electronic test record for the patient listed above and confirmed that the laboratory failed to follow their established procedures to ensure accurate test reports. D5217 EVALUATION OF PROFICIENCY TESTING PERFORMANCE CFR(s): 493.1236(c)(1) At least twice annually, the laboratory must verify the accuracy of any test or procedure it performs that is not included in subpart I of this part. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: **Based on review of accuracy verification documentation and interview with the facility personnel, the laboratory failed to verify the accuracy of dermatopathology testing at least twice annually during 2016 and 2017. Findings include: 1. The laboratory performs patient testing under the sub-specialty of Histopathology, with an approximate annual test volume of 3,000. 2. On the date of the survey, February 22, 2018, the laboratory presented documentation of accuracy verification for Mohs cases that were performed by the laboratory in 2016 and 2017. The facility personnel stated that the laboratory performed the accuracy verification procedure during each respective year, however the original documenation could not be located. The accuracy verification documentation presented for review during the survey for both years (2016 and 2017) was sent for verification by the laboratory in late 2017 and the results were not returned until January 2018. 3. The facility personnel stated that the accuracy verification for Mohs testing was performed for 2016 and 2017 during each respective year but the original documentation could not be located. **This is a repeat deficiency from the previous survey conducted on 01/21/2016. D5293 GENERAL LABORATORY SYSTEMS QUALITY ASSESSMENT CFR(s): 493.1239(b)(c) (b) The general laboratory systems quality assessment must include a review of the effectiveness of

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access