Frontier Medical Associates Of Prestonsburg, Inc

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

2
Total Citations
21
Total Deficiencyies
10
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 18D2210599
Address 400 University Drive Stes 211a And 101, Prestonsburg, KY, 41653
City Prestonsburg
State KY
Zip Code41653
Phone606 886-6622
Lab DirectorBLAKE BURCHETT

Citation History (2 surveys)

Survey - September 24, 2024

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: FLS911

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D2009 D5211 D5403 D5403 D5441 D0000 D2009 D5211 D5441 D6033 D6033

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A recertification survey was conducted on 09/24/2024. The facility was found not to be in compliance with the laboratory requirements of 42 CFR Part 493 with deficiencies cited. D2009 TESTING OF PROFICIENCY TESTING SAMPLES CFR(s): 493.801(b)(1) The individual testing or examining the samples and the laboratory director must attest to the routine integration of the samples into the patient workload using the laboratory's routine methods. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on document review and confirmed in staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Laboratory Director (LD) or their designee signed an attestation statement for proficiency testing (PT) as required for 1 of 8 events reviewed. Findings included: Review of the "Attestation Statement" for the "2024 Hematology / Coagulation 2nd Event," electronically submitted 07/19/2024, revealed, "Signatures Required - For all PT results, an attestation statement must be signed by testing personnel and the laboratory director and retained for a minimum of 2 years." The Attestation Statement revealed the document was not signed or dated by the LD or their designee. In an interview on 09/24/2024 at 1:00 PM, Office Coordinator #1 indicated the lack of a signature was an oversight. D5211 EVALUATION OF PROFICIENCY TESTING PERFORMANCE CFR(s): 493.1236(a) The laboratory must review and evaluate the results obtained on proficiency testing performed as specified in subpart H of this part. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on document review and confirmed in staff interview, the laboratory failed to review the results obtained from proficiency testing (PT) for 1 of 8 events reviewed. Findings included: Review of the "Performance Review and

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - August 28, 2023

Survey Type: Special

Survey Event ID: QYPQ11

Deficiency Tags: D2016 D2130 D6000 D6016 D6016 D0000 D2016 D2130 D6000

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 The following deficiencies are a result of a desk review of proficiency testing scores obtained from the national database and verified with the proficiency testing company. The laboratory was found to be out of compliance with the conditions of the CLIA program. The following CONDITION LEVEL DEFICIENCIES were found to be out of compliance: D2016 - 42 C.F.R. 493.803 Condition: Successful participation [proficiency testing] D6000 - 42 C.F.R. 493.1403 Condition: Laboratories performing moderate complexity testing; laboratory director D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- Based on a proficiency testing desk review of the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting (CASPER)-0155 and American Proficiency Institute (API) 2022 records (3rd event) and 2023 records (2nd event), the laboratory failed to successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by HHS, for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. The laboratory failed to successfully participate in the specialty of Hematology for the Cell identification or white blood cell differential (Cell ID or WBC Diff) analyte. (Refer to D2130) D2130 HEMATOLOGY CFR(s): 493.851(f) Failure to achieve satisfactory performance for the same analyte in two consecutive events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a proficiency testing desk review of the CASPER-0155 and API records 2022 (3rd event) and 2023 (2nd event), the laboratory failed to achieve satisfactory performance (80% or greater) for two (2) of three (3) testing events in the specialty of Hematology for the cell identification or white blood cell differential (Cell ID or WBC Diff) analyte. 1. A review of the CASPER-0155 report revealed the following: Hematology 2022- 3rd Event The Laboratory received an unsatisfactory score of 20% for the Cell ID or WBD Diff analyte. Hematology 2023- 2nd Event The Laboratory received an unsatisfactory score of 67% for the Cell ID or WBC Diff analyte. 2. A review of proficiency testing records from API 2022 and 2023 confirmed the above findings. D6000 MODERATE COMPLEXITY LABORATORY DIRECTOR CFR(s): 493.1403 The laboratory must have a director who meets the qualification requirements of 493. 1405 of this subpart and provides overall management and direction in accordance with 493.1407 of this subpart. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on a proficiency testing desk review of the CASPER-0155 Individual Laboratory Report and API 2022 records (3rd event) and 2023 records (2nd event), the laboratory director failed to provide overall management and direction of the laboratory services. (Refer to D6016) D6016 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1407(e)(4)(i) The laboratory director is responsible for the overall operation and administration of the laboratory, including the employment of personnel who are competent to perform test procedures, and record and report test results promptly, accurate, and proficiently and for assuring compliance with the applicable regulations. (e) The laboratory director must-- (e)(4)(i) Ensure that the proficiency testing samples are tested as required under Subpart H of this part; -- 2 of 3 -- This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a proficiency testing desk review of the CASPER-0155 and API 2022 records (3rd event) and 2023 (2nd event), the laboratory director failed to ensure successful participation in an HHS approved proficiency testing program. (Refer to 2130) -- 3 of 3 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access