George C Grape Community Hospital

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A proficiency testing desk review survey was completed on June 3, 2025. The laboratory was found to be out of compliance with the following CONDITION LEVEL DEFICIENCIES: D2016 - 42 C.F.R 493.803 Condition: Successful Participation D6076 - 42 C.F.R 493.1441 Condition: Laboratory Director, High Complexity D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting (CASPER) 155 report and graded results from the American Proficiency Institute (API), the laboratory failed to successfully participate in two consecutive testing Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- events in the subspecialty of compatibility testing. The laboratory had unsatisfactory scores for 2024 event 3 and 2025 event 1. Refer to D2181. D2181 COMPATIBILITY TESTING CFR(s): 493.863(e) (e) Failure to achieve an overall testing event score of satisfactory for two consecutive testing events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting (CASPER) 155 report and graded results from the American Proficiency Institute (API), the laboratory failed to achieve satisfactory performance (100% or greater) for two consecutive testing events in the subspecialty, compatibility testing. The findings include: 1. For 2024 event 3, the laboratory received an unsatisfactory performance score of 60% for the subspecialty, compatibility testing. 3. For 2025 event 1, the laboratory received an unsatisfactory performance score of 80% for the subspecialty, compatibility testing. 3. The CASPER 155 report and graded results from API confirm the findings listed above. D6076 LABORATORY DIRECTOR CFR(s): 493.1441 The laboratory must have a director who meets the qualification requirements of 493. 1443 of this subpart and provides overall management and direction in accordance with 493.1445 of this subpart. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting (CASPER) 155 report and graded results from the American Proficiency Institute (2024 event 3 and 2025 event 1), the laboratory director failed to provide overall management and direction of the laboratory services. Refer to D6089. D6089 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1445(e)(4)(i) (e)(4)(i) The proficiency testing samples are tested as required under subpart H of this part; This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting (CASPER) 155 report and graded results from the American Proficiency Institute (API), the laboratory director failed to ensure successful participation in an HHS approved proficiency testing program. Refer to D2181. -- 2 of 2 --

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5411 TEST SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, REAGENT CFR(s): 493.1252(a) Test systems must be selected by the laboratory. The testing must be performed following the manufacturer's instructions and in a manner that provides test results within the laboratory's stated performance specifications for each test system as determined under 493.1253. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of Sysmex CA-660 coagulation reagent verification records, observation of the coagulation instrument, and confirmed by laboratory personnel identifier #5 (refer to the Laboratory Personnel Report) at 11:03 am on 09/11/2024, the laboratory failed to program the correct normal patient mean into the coagulation instrument for one out of one lot number of prothrombin time reagent (lot number 564624, expiration 06/02/2025). The findings include: 1. The laboratory began using prothrombin time reagent lot number 564624 (expiration 06/02/2025) for patient testing on 04/29/2023. 2. Review of the coagulation reagent verification records for prothrombin time reagent lot number 564624 indicated that the laboratory established a normal patient mean of 10.1 seconds. 3. Observation of the coagulation instrument showed that the laboratory programmed a normal patient mean of 9.8 seconds in the CA-600 instrument for prothrombin time reagent lot number 564624. 4. At the time of the survey, personnel identifier #5 confirmed that the laboratory programmed the incorrect normal patient mean into the coagulation instrument for prothrombin time reagent lot number 564624 (expiration 06/02/2025). Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 1 --

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5439 CALIBRATION AND CALIBRATION VERIFICATION CFR(s): 493.1255(b) Unless otherwise specified in this subpart, for each applicable test system the laboratory must do the following: Perform and document calibration verification procedure - (b)(1) Following the manufacturer's calibration verification instructions; (b)(2) Using the criteria verified or established by the laboratory under 493.1253(b)(3) -- (b)(2)(i) Including the number, type, and concentration of the materials, as well as acceptable limits for calibration verification; and (b)(2)(ii) Including at least a minimal (or zero) value, a mid-point value, and a maximum value near the upper limit of the range to verify the laboratory's reportable range of test results for the test system; and (b)(3) At least once every 6 months and whenever any of the following occur: (b)(3)(i) A complete change of reagents for a procedure is introduced, unless the laboratory can demonstrate that changing reagent lot numbers does not affect the range used to report patient test results, and control values are not adversely affected by reagent lot number changes. (b)(3)(ii) There is major preventive maintenance or replacement of critical parts that may influence test performance. (b)(3)(iii) Control materials reflect an unusual trend or shift, or are outside of the laboratory's acceptable limits, and other means of assessing and correcting unacceptable control values fail to identify and correct the problem. (b)(3)(iv) The laboratory's established schedule for verifying the reportable range for patient test results requires more frequent calibration verification. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of calibration verification records and confirmed by laboratory personnel identifier #2 (refer to the Laboratory Personnel Report) at approximately 10: 10 am on 10/25/2018, the laboratory failed to perform calibration verification on the Siemens Dimension EXL at least every six months for the analyte, glycated hemoglobin, for four out of four time periods from 09/2016- 09/2018. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 1 --