Georgia Protoncare Center, Inc

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

2
Total Citations
18
Total Deficiencyies
16
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 11D2152556
Address 615 Peachtree Street, Ne, Atlanta, GA, 30308
City Atlanta
State GA
Zip Code30308
Phone(844) 602-1682

Citation History (2 surveys)

Survey - August 26, 2021

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: 42I711

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D2007 D2016 D2089 D6000 D6016 D6018 D6032 D6054

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) recertification survey was completed on August 26, 2021. The laboratory was not in compliance with applicable CLIA requirements found at 42 CFR 493.1 through 42 CFR 493.1780. The following deficiencies were cited: D2007 TESTING OF PROFICIENCY TESTING SAMPLES CFR(s): 493.801(b)(1) The samples must be examined or tested with the laboratory's regular patient workload by personnel who routinely perform the testing in the laboratory, using the laboratory's routine methods This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the College of American Pathologists (CAP) records and staff interview, the lab failed to rotate Proficiency Test (PT) samples among testing personnel (TP). Findings include: 1. Review of the CAP attestation statements revealed the PT samples were run by the same TP # 5 (CMS 209) for the 2019 event #3, 2020 event #1 & 2. 2. Interview with staff #1 (CMS 209) on 8/26/21 at approximately 11:00 AM, confirmed the PT was not rotated between all TP. D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 4 -- in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on proficiency testing document review and staff interviews, the laboratory failed to maintain satisfactory performance in two of three consecutive events ( 2020 event #3 and 2021 event #1), resulting in the first unsuccessful occurrence for Chemistry #245 including: creatine # 0405. Findings include: For details refer to D2089 D2089 ROUTINE CHEMISTRY CFR(s): 493.841(c) Failure to participate in a testing event is unsatisfactory performance and results in a score of 0 for the testing event. Consideration may be given to those laboratories failing to participate in a testing event only if-- (1) Patient testing was suspended during the time frame allotted for testing and reporting proficiency testing results; (2) The laboratory notifies the inspecting agency and the proficiency testing program within the time frame for submitting proficiency testing results of the suspension of patient testing and the circumstances associated with failure to perform tests on proficiency testing samples; and (3)The laboratory participated in the previous two proficiency testing events. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on proficiency testing (PT) document review and staff interviews, the laboratory failed to participate in the College of American Pathology (CAP) proficiency testing events 2020 #3 and 2021 #1. The laboratory failed to participate in two consecutive PT events, which resulted in the 1st unsuccessful occurrence for Routine Chemistry #0245, Creatine analyte #0405. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility CAP PT reports and the CMS Casper 096 report, the laboratory failed the speciality of Chemistry #310, Creatine analyte #0405 for events of 2020 #3 and 2021 #1 with scores of 0% on both events. 2. Interviews with staff #1 (CMS 209) and a nurse supervisor on 8/26/21 at approximately 11:15 AM in office #1106, confirmed non-participation in the aforementioned PT events. D6000 MODERATE COMPLEXITY LABORATORY DIRECTOR CFR(s): 493.1403 The laboratory must have a director who meets the qualification requirements of 493. 1405 of this subpart and provides overall management and direction in accordance with 493.1407 of this subpart. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: -- 2 of 4 -- Based on proficiency testing document review and staff interviews, the laboratory director failed to ensure the lab maintain satisfactory performance in two of three consecutive events ( 2020 event #3 and 2021 event #1), resulting in the first unsuccessful occurrence for Chemistry #245 analyte creatine # 0405. Findings include: Refer to D6016 & D6018 D6016 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1407(e)(4)(i) The laboratory director is responsible for the overall operation and administration of the laboratory, including the employment of personnel who are competent to perform test procedures, and record and report test results promptly, accurate, and proficiently and for assuring compliance with the applicable regulations. (e) The laboratory director must-- (e)(4)(i) Ensure that the proficiency testing samples are tested as required under Subpart H of this part; This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on document review of the laboratory's proficiency testing (PT) reports and staff interview, the laboratory director failed to ensure the laboratory maintained satisfactory performance in two of three consecutive events (2020 #3 and 2021 #1), resulting in the first unsuccessful occurrence for Creatine, analyte # 0405. Findings include: 1. Review of the laboratory's College of American Pathologist (CAP) PT) reports disclosed the laboratory failed analyte # 0405, Creatine on event#3 of 2020 with a score of 0% and event #1 of 2021 with a score of 0%. 2. Interview with staff #1 (CMS 209) on 8/26/21 at 11:11 AM in office #1106, confirmed the laboratory failed the aforementioned testing events, resulting in the first unsuccessful performance. D6018 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1407(e)(4)(iii) The laboratory director is responsible for the overall operation and administration of the laboratory, including the employment of personnel who are competent to perform test procedures, and record and report test results promptly, accurate, and proficiently and for assuring compliance with the applicable regulations. (e) The laboratory director must-- (e)(4)(iii) Ensure that all proficiency testing reports received are reviewed by the appropriate staff to evaluate the laboratory's performance and to identify any problems that require

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - August 28, 2019

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: SEM111

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D5291 D5401 D5407 D5413 D5429 D5805 D6015 D6018

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 An initial Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) survey was completed on August 28, 2019. The laboratory was not in compliance with applicable CLIA requirements found at 42 CFR 493.1 through 42 CFR 493.1780. The following deficiencies were cited: D5291 GENERAL LABORATORY SYSTEMS QUALITY ASSESSMENT CFR(s): 493.1239(a) The laboratory must establish and follow written policies and procedures for an ongoing mechanism to monitor, assess, and, when indicated, correct problems identified in the general laboratory systems requirements specified at 493.1231 through 493.1236. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the laboratory records, the standard operators procedure manual (SOP), and staff interview, the laboratory failed to establish and follow written policies and procedures for an ongoing review to assess all facets of the laboratory's technical and non-technical functions (QA). Findings include: 1. Review of the SOP and lab records provided revealed the lab did not have a QA plan to follow. 2. Interview with staff #1 and Staff #11 (CMS 209 form) on 8/28/19 in office #2 on the main lobby level at 11:30 AM, confirmed the lab did not have a QA plan. D5401 PROCEDURE MANUAL CFR(s): 493.1251(a) A written procedures manual for all tests, assays, and examinations performed by the laboratory must be available to, and followed by, laboratory personnel. Textbooks may supplement but not replace the laboratory's written procedures for testing or examining specimens. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 4 -- This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the standard operators procedural manual (SOP) and staff interview, the lab failed to include written procedures for all tests or procedures required. Findings include: 1. Review of the SOP revealed the lab did not have procedures for: duties and responsibilities for all lab positions, safety, critical values, inoperable test system,

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access