Harris Medical Services, Llc

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

3
Total Citations
9
Total Deficiencyies
8
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 44D2040074
Address 3328 Jenkins Rd, Ste 200, Chattanooga, TN, 37421
City Chattanooga
State TN
Zip Code37421
Phone423 825-4040
Lab DirectorWEE JUNG

Citation History (3 surveys)

Survey - June 18, 2025

Survey Type: Special

Survey Event ID: 3FOW11

Deficiency Tags: D2130 D6000 D0000 D2016 D2131 D6016

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A desk review survey conducted on 06/18/2025 of proficiency scores resulted in the following deficiencies. The laboratory was found to be out of compliance with the following conditions: D2016- 493.803 Condition: Successful participation D6000- 493.1403 Condition: Laboratories performing moderate complexity testing; laboratory director. . D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on a desk review survey of proficiency testing (PT) records from the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting (CASPER) 0155 report and the American Proficiency Institute (API) proficiency testing records, the laboratory Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- failed to successfully participate in the White Blood Cell (WBC) Count analyte and the Hematology specialty. Refer to D2130 and D2131. . D2130 HEMATOLOGY CFR(s): 493.851(f) (f) Failure to achieve satisfactory performance for the same analyte in two consecutive events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a proficiency testing desk review of the CASPER 0155 report and the API 2024 and 2025 PT records, the laboratory failed to achieve satisfactory performance (80% or better) for the same analyte in two out of three consecutive testing events in the specialty of Hematology for the White Blood Cell (WBC) Count analyte. The findings include: 1. A review of the CASPER 0155 report revealed the following results: 2024 Event Two: The laboratory received an unsatisfactory score of 0% for WBC Count 2025 Event One: The laboratory received an unsatisfactory score of 60% for WBC Count 2. A review of the API 2024 and 2025 proficiency testing records (2024 Hematology/Coagulation- 2nd Event and 2025 Hematology/Coagulation - 1st Event) confirmed that the laboratory received the above results. . D2131 HEMATOLOGY CFR(s): 493.851(g) (g) Failure to achieve an overall testing event score of satisfactory performance for two consecutive testing events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a proficiency testing desk review of the CASPER 0155 report and the API 2024 and 2025 PT records, the laboratory failed to achieve satisfactory overall performance (80% or better) in two out of three consecutive testing events for the specialty of Hematology. The findings include: 1. A review of the CASPER 0155 report revealed the following results: 2024 Event Two: The laboratory received an overall unsatisfactory score of 0% for Hematology 2025 Event One: The laboratory received an overall unsatisfactory score of 60% for Hematology 2. A review of the API 2024 and 2025 proficiency testing records (2024 Hematology/Coagulation- 2nd Event and 2025 Hematology/Coagulation - 1st Event) confirmed that the laboratory received the above results. . D6000 MODERATE COMPLEXITY LABORATORY DIRECTOR CFR(s): 493.1403 The laboratory must have a director who meets the qualification requirements of 493. 1405 of this subpart and provides overall management and direction in accordance with 493.1407 of this subpart. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on a proficiency testing desk review of the CASPER 0155 report and the API 2024 and 2025 records, the laboratory director failed to provide overall management -- 2 of 3 -- and direction of the laboratory services. The laboratory director failed to ensure that proficiency testing samples were tested as required. Refer to D6016. . D6016 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1407(e)(4)(i) (e)(4)(i) The proficiency testing samples are tested as required under Subpart H of this part; This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a proficiency testing desk review of the CASPER 0155 report and the API 2024 and 2025 records, the laboratory director failed to ensure proficiency testing samples were tested as required. The laboratory director failed to ensure successful participation in an HHS approved proficiency testing program. Refer to D 2130 and D2131. . -- 3 of 3 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - January 10, 2023

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: QRL811

Deficiency Tags: D5445 D5403

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5403 PROCEDURE MANUAL CFR(s): 493.1251(b) The procedure manual must include the following when applicable to the test procedure: (1) Requirements for patient preparation; specimen collection, labeling, storage, preservation, transportation, processing, and referral; and criteria for specimen acceptability and rejection as described in 493.1242. (2) Microscopic examination, including the detection of inadequately prepared slides. (3) Step-by-step performance of the procedure, including test calculations and interpretation of results. (4) Preparation of slides, solutions, calibrators, controls, reagents, stains, and other materials used in testing. (5) Calibration and calibration verification procedures. (6) The reportable range for test results for the test system as established or verified in 493.1253. (7) Control procedures. (8)

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - May 1, 2018

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: UAKX11

Deficiency Tags: D5445

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5445 CONTROL PROCEDURES CFR(s): 493.1256(d)(1)(2)(g) Unless CMS Approves a procedure, specified in Appendix C of the State Operations Manual (CMS Pub. 7), that provides equivalent quality testing, the laboratory must-- (d)(1) Perform control procedures as defined in this section unless otherwise specified in the additional specialty and subspecialty requirements at 493.1261 through 493.1278. (d)(2) For each test system, perform control procedures using the number and frequency specified by the manufacturer or established by the laboratory when they meet or exceed the requirements in paragraph (d)(3) of this section. (g) The laboratory must document all control procedures performed. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: ___________________________________ Based on lack of Quality Control documentation for Uricult media, lack of Individualized Quality Control Plan (IQCP) and interview with Primary Laboratory Person, the laboratory failed to have an IQCP procedure in place for Uricult Media since January 1, 2016. The findings include: 1. Lack of quality control documentation for new lot numbers and new shipments for Uricult media. 2. Lack of an IQCP procedure for Uricult Media since January 1, 2016. 3. Interview at approximately 12:00 p.m. May 1, 2018 with Primary Laboratory Person confirmed the laboratory did not have an IQCP in place for Uricult media since January 1, 2016. _____________________________________ Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 1 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access