Howell Healthcare

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

2
Total Citations
11
Total Deficiencyies
11
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 05D2076326
Address 11126 Chandler Blvd, North Hollywood, CA, 91601
City North Hollywood
State CA
Zip Code91601
Phone(818) 985-0044

Citation History (2 surveys)

Survey - July 14, 2021

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: 6T7011

Deficiency Tags: D5407 D5417 D5415 D6082

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5407 PROCEDURE MANUAL CFR(s): 493.1251(d) Procedures and changes in procedures must be approved, signed, and dated by the current laboratory director before use. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the laboratory's policies and procedures manual and interview with the testing personnel (TP) it was determined; that the laboratory failed to update protocols in place when changes occurred in the laboratory and the effective date and signature of approval by the laboratory director (LD) of such changes. The findings included: 1. On the day of the survey 07/14/2021 approximately 12:30 p.m. the procedure manual in place had not being updated to reflect current testing performed in the laboratory. 2. The TP affirmed on July 14, 2021 at approximately 1:00 p.m. that the laboratory failed to update protocols for the current testing performed in the laboratory and that the effective date and the laboratory director's signature were missing. 4. The laboratory's testing declaration form stated that the laboratory processes approximately 5,000 samples annually. D5415 TEST SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, REAGENT CFR(s): 493.1252(c) Reagents, solutions, culture media, control materials, calibration materials, and other supplies, as appropriate, must be labeled to indicate the following: (1) Identity and when significant, titer, strength or concentration. (2) Storage requirements. (3) Preparation and expiration dates. (4) Other pertinent information required for proper use. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- Based on observation of the laboratory's reagent materials and testing kits and interview with the laboratory's testing personnel (TP); it was determined that the laboratory failed to label reagents to indicate the opening, preparation, and expiration dates when such reagents are used. The findings included: 1. Based on the surveyor's observation during the laboratory tour on July 14, 2021 at approximately 11:00 a.m., the TP indicated that no opening, preparation, or expiration date labels were documented for all the reagents used in the laboratory. 2. The laboratory's TP affirmed in an interview conducted July 14, 2021 at approximately 11:30 a.m. that the reagents currently used to test patients samples were not labeled with opening, preparation, and expiration dates. 3. Based on the laboratory's annual testing declaration submitted at the time of the survey, the laboratory analyzed approximately 5,000 samples annually. D5417 TEST SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, REAGENT CFR(s): 493.1252(d) Reagents, solutions, culture media, control materials, calibration materials, and other supplies must not be used when they have exceeded their expiration date, have deteriorated, or are of substandard quality. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on the surveyors' observation, examination of laboratory reagents, and interview with the testing personnel (TP), it was determined that the laboratory failed to not use reagents when they have exceeded their expiration date. The findings included: 1. On the day of inspection, July 14, 2021 at approximately 11:30 a.m., the surveyor found the following reagents being used beyond its expiration date: Reagent Lot # Expiration Date One Step Cardiac Panel WCOIA June 2021 BD Vacutainer UA 93444900 5/31/2021 AMIES Transpor Swab 1916574 1/31/2021 2. The TP affirmed on 7/14/2021 at approximately 11:45 a.m. using the reagents listed in (1) beyond its expiration date. 3. Based on the laboratory's submitted testing declaration volume, the laboratory tests and reports approximately 5,000 tests annually. D6082 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1445(e)(1) The laboratory director must ensure that testing systems developed and used for each of the tests performed in the laboratory provide quality laboratory services for all aspects of test performance, which includes the preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic phases of testing. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the laboratory's records for policies and procedures, labelling and expiration date of reagents in use, and interview with laboratory staff on July 14, 2021; it was determined that the laboratory director failed to ensure that several aspects of the preanalytical and analytical phases of laboratory testing were monitored. See D5407, D5415, and D5417. -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - October 9, 2018

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: 3NJG11

Deficiency Tags: D1001 D2130 D5217 D6054 D2016 D3041 D5445

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D1001 CERTIFICATE OF WAIVER TESTS CFR(s): 493.15(e) Laboratories eligible for a certificate of waiver must-- (1) Follow manufacturers' instructions for performing the test; and (2) Meet the requirements in subpart B, Certificate of Waiver, of this part. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a tour of the laboratory, an interview with the laboratory director and a laboratory testing person and on 10/09/2018 (survey date) and review of manufacturer's instructions (package inserts), the laboratory failed to follow manufacturer's guidelines/operator's manual for quality control materials for all waived testing performed. The findings included. a. The laboratory staff stated per interview on 10/09/2018 that the Quality control (QC) policy for waived testing(s) was to performed QC once every thirty (30) days. Sekisui Diagnostic Influenza A & B manufacturer's guidelines under "External Quality Control Testing" states: Quality Control requirements should be established in accordance with local, state and federal regulators or accreditation requirements. Minimally, Sekisui Diagnostics recommends that positive and negative controls be run with each new lot, shipment received and with each new operator. Alere BinaxNow RSV card manufacturer's guidelines under "Quality Control (QC)" states: Test these swabs once with each new shipment received. Medline Strep A Test strip manufacturer's guidelines under "External Quality Control" states: It is recommended that a positive and negative external control be run once per kit. Rapid Mononucleosis test manufacturer's guidelines under "Quality control" states: That positive and negative controls be run once for each untrained operator, once for each new shipment of kits - provided that each different lot received in the shipment is tested - and as deemed additionally necessary by your internal quality control procedures, and in accordance with local, State, and Federal Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 5 -- regulations or accreditation requirements. b. The laboratory director and a testing person affirmed on 10/09/2018, 12:00 that quality controls were not being performed in accordance with manufacture's guidelines. D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of CMS proficiency testing (PT) records (i.e. CMS CASPER Reports 0096D), it was determined that the laboratory failed to successfully participate in a PT program approved by CMS for each analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. The findings included: The laboratory failed to achieve satisfactory performance for the same analyte or test in two out of three consecutive testing events in the specialty of Hematology constituting unsuccessful PT performances. (See D2130) D2130 HEMATOLOGY CFR(s): 493.851(f) Failure to achieve satisfactory performance for the same analyte in two consecutive events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review eight (8) randomly selected patient reports from 03/01/2017 to 09/08 /2018, quality control (QC) records and CMS PT records (CMS CASPER 0096D), it was determined that the laboratory failed to achieve satisfactory performance for the same analyte or test in two out of three consecutive PT events for the analyte, WBC Differential, resulting in an "initial" (first) unsuccessful performance. The findings include: a. The laboratory failed to maintain successful performance with the American Proficiency Institute (API) PT program by failing to obtain a score of 80% of acceptable responses in two out of three consecutive PT events for the analyte, WBC Differential performed on the Coulter AC-TDiff II analyzer, as follows: White Blood Cell Diff 2016 Q2 (20%) 2017 Q3 (60%) 2018 Q2 (40%) Q1 = First Testing Event Q2 = Second Testing Event Q3 = Third Testing Event b. Failure to achieve -- 2 of 5 -- satisfactory performance for the same analyte or test in two out of three consecutive PT resulted in an non-initial (subsequent) unsuccessful performance for the analyte, WBC Differential. c. The laboratory director affirmed on 10/09/2018, 12:00 (survey date) that the PT resulted in an non-initial (subsequent) unsuccessful performance for the analyte, WBC Differential. d. The laboratory testing declaration form, signed by the laboratory Director on 10/09/2018 that the laboratory performs approximately 500 automated CBCD tests annually. D3041 RETENTION REQUIREMENTS CFR(s): 493.1105(a)(6) Test reports. Retain or be able to retrieve a copy of the original report (including final, preliminary, and corrected reports) at least 2 years after the date of reporting. (i) In addition, retain immunohematology reports as specified in 21 CFR 606.160(d) (ii) and pathology test reports for at least 10 years after the date of reporting. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on the lack of review of the laboratory's confidential morbidity reports (CMR), and interview with laboratory director, the laboratory failed to retain a copy of the original report for at least two years (January 2017 to October 09, 2018). Findings included: a. No confidential morbidity reports could be retrieved on 10/09/2018 (survey date) for patients with reactive results reported using the Quidel QuickVue (moderate complexity) for Chlamydia testing. b) The laboratory director affirmed 10 /09/2008, 12:00 that the patient confidential morbidity reports were not retained in the laboratory for at least two years. c. The laboratory estimated the volume of bacteriology (Chlamydia) testing as seventy-one (71) from January 2017 to 10/09 /2018 . D5217 EVALUATION OF PROFICIENCY TESTING PERFORMANCE CFR(s): 493.1236(c)(1) At least twice annually, the laboratory must verify the accuracy of any test or procedure it performs that is not included in subpart I of this part. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview with the laboratory director on October 09, 2018 (survey date) and test data provided on October 10, 2018 for seventy-one (71) patients Chlamydia (moderate complexity) testing from January, 2017 to October 09, 2018, the laboratory failed to verify the testing accuracy of the Quidel QuickVue test performed at least twice annually for the years 2017 and 2018. The findings included: a. The laboratory was unable to provide documentation or previous records for verification of the Quidel QuickVue Chlamydia testing accuracy at least twice annually from 2017 to September, 2018. b. The laboratory director on October 09, 2018, 2018, 12:00 affirmed that the laboratory failed to verify the accuracy of the test twice annually. c. The laboratory Director on October 10, 2018, stated (per e-mail) that the laboratory performed approximately seventy-one (71) patients Chlamydia (moderate complexity) testing from January, 2017 to October 09, 2018. D5445 CONTROL PROCEDURES CFR(s): 493.1256(d)(1)(2)(g) -- 3 of 5 -- Unless CMS Approves a procedure, specified in Appendix C of the State Operations Manual (CMS Pub. 7), that provides equivalent quality testing, the laboratory must-- (d)(1) Perform control procedures as defined in this section unless otherwise specified in the additional specialty and subspecialty requirements at 493.1261 through 493.1278. (d)(2) For each test system, perform control procedures using the number and frequency specified by the manufacturer or established by the laboratory when they meet or exceed the requirements in paragraph (d)(3) of this section. (g) The laboratory must document all control procedures performed. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the laboratory quality control (QC) records for Chlamydia (moderate complexity) testing using the Quidel QuickVue kit and an interview with the laboratory director 10/09/2018 (survey date), it was determined that the laboratory failed to perform control procedures as defined per manufacturer's guidelines, or CLIA regulation 493.1256 (d) (2) "For each test system, perform control procedures using the number and frequency specified by the manufacturer or established by the laboratory when they meet or exceed the requirements in" (d)(3) "At least once each day patient specimens are assayed or examined perform the following for:" (whichever is more stringent). The laboratory also had not instituted an alternate "Individual Quality Control Plan" (IQCP) including Risk Assessment, Quality Control and Quality Assessment. The findings included: a. The laboratory performs Chlamydia (moderate complexity) testing using the Quidel QuickVue kit. The manufacturer's guidelines under QC Testing Procedure states: "The QuickVue Positive and Negative solutions should be tested with each new lot or shipment of test materials once for 25-test kit and as otherwise required by your laboratory's standard quality control procedure", or the default CLIA regulation 493.1256 (d) (2), (d)(3), whichever is more stringent. b. The laboratory director affirmed on 10/09/2018, 12:00 (survey date) that QC was not performed in accordance with manufacturer's guidelines, or CLIA regulation 493.1256 (d) (2), (d) (3) and that no alternative IQCP program was instituted for the Chlamydia (moderate complexity) for testing performed and reported. c. The laboratory Director stated on October 10, 2018 (per e- mail), that the laboratory performed approximately seventy-one (71) patients Chlamydia (moderate complexity) testing from January, 2017 to October 09, 2018. D6054 TECHNICAL CONSULTANT RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1413(b)(9) The technical consultant is responsible for evaluating and documenting the performance of individuals responsible for moderate complexity testing at least annually, after the first year. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review and lack of documentation of annual personnel competency records and interview with the laboratory director (technical consultant), it was determined that the technical consultant failed to evaluate and document competencies for one testing personnel responsible for moderate complexity testing. The findings included: a. No evidence could be retrieved for annual competencies for all testing personnel of moderate complexity testing in the year 2017 performing moderate complexity testing for automated Complete blood counts with differential (CBCD) performed on the Coulter AC-TDiff II analyzer. b. The laboratory director affirmed 10/09/2018, 12:00 (survey date) that testing personnel competency records could not be retrieved for the -- 4 of 5 -- annual performance of the testing personnel for the year 2017. c. The laboratory testing declaration form, signed by the laboratory Director on 10/09/2018 that the laboratory performs approximately 500 automated CBCD tests annually. -- 5 of 5 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access