Jellico Medical Center, Inc

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

2
Total Citations
5
Total Deficiencyies
5
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 44D0870225
Address 188 Hospital Lane, Jellico, TN, 37762
City Jellico
State TN
Zip Code37762
Phone(423) 455-0245

Citation History (2 surveys)

Survey - January 14, 2020

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: QH0I11

Deficiency Tags: D3007 D5437 D2000

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D2000 ENROLLMENT AND TESTING OF SAMPLES CFR(s): 493.801 Each laboratory must enroll in a proficiency testing (PT) program that meets the criteria in subpart I of this part and is approved by HHS. The laboratory must enroll in an approved program or programs for each of the specialties and subspecialties for which it seeks certification. The laboratory must test the samples in the same manner as patients' specimens. For laboratories subject to 42 CFR part 493 published on March 14, 1990 (55 FR 9538) prior to September 1, 1992, the rules of this subpart are effective on September 1, 1992. For all other laboratories, the rules of this subpart are effective January 1, 1994. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: =================================== Based on lack of Proficiency Testing (PT) enrollment order confirmation and upon interview with the Laboratory Supervisor, it was determined the laboratory failed to enroll in proficiency testing for regulated analytes for hematology, chemistry, immunohematology, and coagulation testing for 2020. The findings include: 1. There was no documentation of Proficiency Testing enrollment for regulated analytes for hematology, chemistry, immunohematology, and coagulation testing for 2020. 2. An interview with the Laboratory Supervisor at approximately 1:30 p.m. on January 14, 2020 confirmed the laboratory failed to enroll in Proficiency Testing for 2020. =================================== D3007 FACILITIES CFR(s): 493.1101(b) The laboratory must have appropriate and sufficient equipment, instruments, reagents, materials, and supplies for the type and volume of testing it performs. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: =================================== Based on the Laboratory's test menu on 1/13/2020 and upon observation of reagents for CSF (Cerebrospinal fluid) analysis, body fluid cell counts, PSA (Prostate-specific antigen) screening, Free T4, and test kits for Influenza A/B and Mononucleosis Spot Test, the laboratory failed to have sufficient regents to perform these tests that were within the laboratory's stated test performance menu. The findings include: 1. Review of the Laboratory's test menu as stated on 1/13/2020 and observation of reagents for CSF analysis, body fluid cell counts, PSA screening, and Free T4, and test kits for Influenza A/B and Mononucleosis Spot Test, the laboratory failed to have sufficient reagents &/or test kits to perform the tests that were within the laboratory's stated test performance menu. 2. An interview at approximately 1:30 p.m. on January 14, 2020 with the Laboratory Supervisor confirmed the laboratory was unable to perform tests as stated due to lack of sufficient reagents &/or test kits. =================================== D5437 CALIBRATION AND CALIBRATION VERIFICATION CFR(s): 493.1255(a) Unless otherwise specified in this subpart, for each applicable test system the laboratory must perform and document calibration procedures-- (1) Following the manufacturer's test system instructions, using calibration materials provided or specified, and with at least the frequency recommended by the manufacturer; (2) Using the criteria verified or established by the laboratory as specified in 493.1253(b) (3)-- (2)(i) Using calibration materials appropriate for the test system and, if possible, traceable to a reference method or reference material of known value; and (2)(ii) Including the number, type, and concentration of calibration materials, as well as acceptable limits for and the frequency of calibration; and (3) Whenever calibration verification fails to meet the laboratory's acceptable limits for calibration verification. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: =================================== Based on lack of documentation for Linearity/Calibration testing for Chemistry analytes performed on the Siemens Chemistry Analyzer and upon interview with the Laboratory Supervisor, it was determined the laboratory failed to perform linearity testing every 6 months for 2019 to ensure reportable range of testing for electrolytes (sodium, potassium, chloride, and bicarbonate). The findings include: 1. There was no documentation of Linearity /Calibration testing for electrolytes performed on the Chemistry Analyzer since June 2019. 2. An interview at approximately 1:30 p.m. on January 14, 2020 with the Laboratory Supervisor confirmed that Linearity/Calibration testing was not performed at 6 month intervals in 2019 for electrolytes. =================================== -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - June 25, 2019

Survey Type: Special

Survey Event ID: V2IO11

Deficiency Tags: D2016 D2181

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: ==================================== Immunohematology: The laboratory failed to maintain satisfactory participation in two out of three events for Compatibility Testing, resulting in the first unsuccessful proficiency testing (PT) occurrence for Compatibility Testing. (Refer to D2181) ===================================== D2181 COMPATIBILITY TESTING CFR(s): 493.863(e) Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- Failure to achieve an overall testing event score of satisfactory for two consecutive testing events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: ==================================== Based on Proficiency Testing (PT) Desk Review of the CMS CASPER PT Report 0155D and Proficiency Testing Program Performance Summary for Compatibility Testing, the Laboratory failed to achieve satisfactory scores of 100% in two out of three events, making this the first occurrence of unsuccessful PT for Compatibility Testing. The findings include: 1. PT Desk Review of the CMS CASPER Individual PT Report 0155D revealed unsatisfactory scores of 80% for Compatibility Testing for the 2nd event of 2018 and the 1st event of 2019. 2. PT Desk Review of the Proficiency Testing Program Performance Summary revealed 80% scores for Compatibility Testing for the 2nd event of 2018 and the 1st event of 2019, resulting in the first unsuccessful PT occurrence for Compatibility Testing. ===================================== -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access