Lab Clinico Lorimar

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

1
Total Citation
11
Total Deficiencyies
6
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 40D0885142
Address Calle Pedro Santos, Num 65, Moca, PR, 00676
City Moca
State PR
Zip Code00676
Phone(787) 877-1236

Citation History (1 survey)

Survey - February 13, 2020

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: C8GN11

Deficiency Tags: D6093 D6093 D6117 D6117 D5405 D6107 D6107 D6103 D6103 D6177 D6177

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5405 PROCEDURE MANUAL CFR(s): 493.1251(c) Manufacturer's test system instructions or operator manuals may be used, when applicable, to meet the requirements of paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(12) of this section. Any of the items under paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(12) of this section not provided by the manufacturer must be provided by the laboratory. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on ASI manufacturer's instruction, syphilis serology testing records (year 2019) review and testing personnel interview at 11:35 AM on February 13, 2020, it was determined that the laboratory failed to follow the manufacturer's instruction for quality control when 825 out of 825 patient's specimen were tested for syphilis serology from September 4, 2019 to December 31, 2019 by the ASI Rapid plasma reagin (RPR) method. The findings include: 1. The laboratory performed the RPR tests by the ASI method from September 4, 2019 to December 31, 2019. 2. The ASI manufacturer's instruction establishes that three levels of control materials ( Reactive, Weak Reactive and NonReactive ) must be included each day of testing. 3. At 11:35 AM on February 13, 2020, the syphilis serology testing records showed that the laboratory did not include each day of RPR testing the Weak Reactive control from September 4, 2019 to December 31, 2019. 4. The technical supervisor confirmed at 11: 35 AM on February 13, 2020, that the laboratory did not include each day of RPR testing the Weak Reactive control from September 4, 2019 to December 31, 2019 . 5. The laboratory processed and reported 825 out of 825 patient's specimen were tested for syphilis serology from September 4, 2019 to December 31, 2019 by the ASI (RPR) method. D6093 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1445(e)(5) Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- The laboratory director must ensure that the quality control programs are established and maintained to assure the quality of laboratory services provided and to identify failures in quality as they occur. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on ASI manufacturer's instruction, syphilis serology testing records (year 2019) review and testing personnel interview at 11:35 AM on February 13, 2020, it was determined that the laboratory director failed to comply with the analytic system requirement (syphilis serology (RPR) tests. Refer to D 5405 (The laboratory failed to follow the manufacturer's instruction for quality control when 825 out of 825 patient's specimen were tested for syphilis serology from September 4, 2019 to December 31, 2019 by the ASI Rapid plasma reagin (RPR) method). D6103 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1445(e)(13) The laboratory director must ensure that policies and procedures are established for monitoring individuals who conduct preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical phases of testing to assure that they are competent and maintain their competency to process specimens, perform test procedures and report test results promptly and proficiently, and whenever necessary, identify needs for remedial training or continuing education to improve skills. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of personnel records files and interview with the laboratory director at 12:35 PM on February 13, 2020, it was determined that the laboratory director did not ensure that policies and procedures are established for monitoring the competence of the technical supervisor (MT#2) since February 13, 2018. The findings include: 1. At 12:35 PM on February 13, 2020, the technical supervisor (MT#2) personnel file did not include her competence since February 13, 2018. 2. The laboratory director confirmed at 12:35 PM on February 13, 2020, that the technical supervisor competence was not performed. D6107 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1445(e)(15) The laboratory director must specify, in writing, the responsibilities and duties of each consultant and each supervisor, as well as each person engaged in the performance of the preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic phases of testing, that identifies which examinations and procedures each individual is authorized to perform, whether supervision is required for specimen processing, test performance or result reporting and whether supervisory or director review is required prior to reporting patient test results. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of personnel records files and interview with the laboratory director at 12:35 PM on February 13, 2020, it was determined that the laboratory director did not specify the duties of the laboratory technical supervisor (MT#2). The findings include: 1. At 12:35 PM on February 13, 2020, the technical supervisor (MT#2) personnel file did not include her written duties and responsibilities. 2. The laboratory -- 2 of 3 -- director confirmed at 12:35 PM on February 13, 2020, that the written duties and responsibilities were not included in her personal file. D6117 TECHNICAL SUPERVISOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1451(b)(4) The technical supervisor is responsible for establishing a quality control program appropriate for the testing performed and establishing the parameters for acceptable levels of analytic performance and ensuring that these levels are maintained throughout the entire testing process from the initial receipt of the specimen, through sample analysis and reporting of test results. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on ASI manufacturer's instruction, syphilis serology testing records (year 2019) review and testing personnel interview at 11:35 AM on February 13, 2020, it was determined that the technical supervisor failed to ensure compliance with the requirements for analytic systems for syphilis serology tests. Refer to D 5405 (The laboratory failed to follow the manufacturer's instruction for quality control when 825 out of 825 patient's specimen were tested for syphilis serology from September 4, 2019 to December 31, 2019 by the ASI Rapid plasma reagin (RPR) method). D6177 TESTING PERSONNEL RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1495(b)(3) Each individual performing high complexity testing must adhere to the laboratory's quality control policies, document all quality control activities, instrument and procedural calibrations and maintenance performed. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on ASI manufacturer's instruction, syphilis serology testing records (year 2019) review and testing personnel interview at 11:35 AM on February 13, 2020, it was determined that the testing personnel failed to follow the manufacturer's instruction for quality control when 825 out of 825 patient's specimen were tested for syphilis serology from September 4, 2019 to December 31, 2019 by the ASI Rapid plasma reagin (RPR) method. Refer to D 5405. -- 3 of 3 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access