Lab Clinico San Martin

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

2
Total Citations
14
Total Deficiencyies
7
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 40D0669382
Address 75 Dr Pedro Albizu Campos St, Lares, PR, 00669
City Lares
State PR
Zip Code00669
Phone(787) 897-2479

Citation History (2 surveys)

Survey - July 9, 2025

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: QR0X11

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D5421 D5421 D0000 D5411 D6085 D5411 D6085

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) conducted an unannounced CLIA recertification survey at Laboratorio Clinico San Martin on July 9, 2025. The laboratory was surveyed under 42 CFR part 493 CLIA requirements. The following standard level deficiencies were found during the recertification CLIA survey ending on July 9, 2025. D5411 TEST SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, REAGENT CFR(s): 493.1252(a) (a) Test systems must be selected by the laboratory. The testing must be performed following the manufacturer's instructions and in a manner that provides test results within the laboratory's stated performance specifications for each test system as determined under 493.1253. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: A. Syphilis serology Based on syphilis serology quality control records, manufacturer's instructions review, and laboratory supervisor interview, on July 9, 2025 at 10:10 AM, it was determined that the laboratory failed to follow the manufacturer's instructions for the syphilis serology tests, when 1,489 patient specimens were processed and reported from January 1, 2024 to July 9, 2025. The findings include: 1. The laboratory uses the Aim RPR Test reagent kit to perform patient syphilis serology test. Review of the Aim RPR Test manufacturer's instructions on July 9, 2025 at 10:06 AM, showed that the laboratory must remove and wash the needle at the end of the day. 2. On July 9, 2025 at 10:10 AM the syphilis serology quality control records were reviewed. The records showed that the laboratory did not perform the needle wash as required by the manufacturer, when they processed and reported 1,489 patient specimens from January 1, 2024 to July 9, 2025. 3. The laboratory supervisor confirmed on July 9, 2025 at 10:15 AM, that the laboratory did not follow the manufacturer's instructions related to the needle wash, from January 1, 2024 to July 9, 2025. B. Coagulation Based on coagulation Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- instrument Sysmex CA-500 maintenance records, and laboratory supervisor interview on July 9, 2025 at 10:27 AM, it was determined that the laboratory failed to perform the monthy maintenance of the instrument, when 1,104 patient specimens were processed and reported for coagulation tests from January 1, 2024 to July 9, 2025. The findings include: 1. The laboratory uses the Sysmex CA-500 instrument to perform patient's coagulation tests. 2. On July 9, 2025 at 10:27 AM, the Sysmex CA-500 instrument maintenance records were reviewed, and showed that the laboratory failed to perform the following monthy maintenance: Perform LED Calibration, when they processed and reported 1,104 patient specimens from January 1, 2024 to July 9, 2025. 3. The laboratory supervisor confirmed on July 9, 2025 at 10:33 AM, that the laboratory did not perform the monthly maintenance of the coagulation instrument. D5421 ESTABLISHMENT AND VERIFICATION OF PERFORMANCE CFR(s): 493.1253(b)(1) (b) Each laboratory that introduces an unmodified, FDA-cleared or approved test system must do the following before reporting patient test results: (b)(1)(i) Demonstrate that it can obtain performance specifications comparable to those established by the manufacturer for the following performance characteristics: (b)(1)(i) (A) Accuracy. (b)(1)(i)(B) Precision. (b)(1)(i)(C) Reportable range of test results for the test system. (b)(1)(ii) Verify that the manufacturer's reference intervals (normal values) are appropriate for the laboratory's patient population. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the chemistry Atellica CI 1900 instrument performance verification results, and laboratory supervisor interview on July 9, 2025 at 11:19 AM, it was determined that the laboratory failed to evaluate the instrument's obtained results. The findings include: 1. On July 9, 2025 at 11:19 AM, review of the chemistry Atellica CI 1900 instrument performance verification results did not reflect the evaluation and signature of the laboratory director prior to begin to test chemistry patient samples. 2. On July 9, 2025 at 11:22 AM, laboratory supervisor stated that the chemistry Atellica CI 1900 instrument was used to perform patient testing since October 1, 2024. 3. The laboratory supervisor confirmed on July 9, 2025 at 11:24 AM that the laboratory director did not evaluate and sign the performance verification of the chemistry Atellica CI 1900 instrument. 4. The laboratory processed and reported 5,861 chemistry tests on the chemistry Atellica CI 1900 instrument from October 1, 2024 to July 9, 2025. D6085 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1445(e)(3) (e)(3) Ensure that-- (e)(3)(i) The test methodologies selected have the capability of providing the quality of results required for patient care; This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the quality control records, manufacturer's instructions review, and interview with the laboratory supervisor on July 9, 2025 at 11:24 AM; it was determined that the laboratory director failed to fulfill her responsibilities and duties to ensure compliance with the manufacturer's instructions and laboratory quality control requirements. Refer to D5411, and D5421. -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - August 2, 2019

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: ZQEG11

Deficiency Tags: D5439 D6144 D6093 D6144 D5439 D6093

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5439 CALIBRATION AND CALIBRATION VERIFICATION CFR(s): 493.1255(b) Unless otherwise specified in this subpart, for each applicable test system the laboratory must do the following: Perform and document calibration verification procedure - (b)(1) Following the manufacturer's calibration verification instructions; (b)(2) Using the criteria verified or established by the laboratory under 493.1253(b)(3) -- (b)(2)(i) Including the number, type, and concentration of the materials, as well as acceptable limits for calibration verification; and (b)(2)(ii) Including at least a minimal (or zero) value, a mid-point value, and a maximum value near the upper limit of the range to verify the laboratory's reportable range of test results for the test system; and (b)(3) At least once every 6 months and whenever any of the following occur: (b)(3)(i) A complete change of reagents for a procedure is introduced, unless the laboratory can demonstrate that changing reagent lot numbers does not affect the range used to report patient test results, and control values are not adversely affected by reagent lot number changes. (b)(3)(ii) There is major preventive maintenance or replacement of critical parts that may influence test performance. (b)(3)(iii) Control materials reflect an unusual trend or shift, or are outside of the laboratory's acceptable limits, and other means of assessing and correcting unacceptable control values fail to identify and correct the problem. (b)(3)(iv) The laboratory's established schedule for verifying the reportable range for patient test results requires more frequent calibration verification. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on routine chemistry quality control records review ( year 2018-2019) and laboratory director interview at 10:00 a.m. on August 2, 2019, it was determined that the laboratory failed to perform at least every 6 months the calibration verification procedures for the routine chemistry (Lytes) tests processed by the Dimension EXL 200 system. The findings include: 1. The laboratory uses since march 2017 a Dimension EXL 200 system for routine chemistry tests. 2. From January 2018 to Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- August 2019, the records showed that the laboratory did not perform at least every 6 months the calibration verification procedures for the routine chemistry (Lytes) tests processed by Dimension EXL 200 system. 3. The laboratory processed and reported 9,215 electrolytes patients specimens tests by the Dimension X pand system since January 2018. 4. The laboratory director confirmed on August 2, 2019 at 10:00 A.M., that the laboratory did not perform at least 6 months the calibration verification procedures for Lytes by the Dimension EXL 200 system. D6093 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1445(e)(5) The laboratory director must ensure that the quality control programs are established and maintained to assure the quality of laboratory services provided and to identify failures in quality as they occur. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on routine chemistry calibration verification records review ( year 2018-2019) of the Dimension EXL-200 system and interview with the laboratory director on August 2, 2019 at 10:00 A.M., it was determined that the laboratory director failed to ensure compliance with the requirements for analytic systems. The finding includes: 1. The laboratory failed to perform at least every 6 months the calibration verification procedures for the routine chemistry (Lytes) tests processed by the Dimension EXL 200 system. Refer to D5439. D6144 GENERAL SUPERVISOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1463 The general supervisor is responsible for day-to-day supervision or oversight of the laboratory operation and personnel performing testing and reporting test results. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on routine chemistry calibration verification records review ( year 2018-2019) of the Dimension EXL-200 system and interview with the laboratory director on August 2, 2019 at 10:00 A.M., it was determined that the laboratory general supervisor failed to ensure compliance with the requirements for analytic systems. The finding includes: 1. The laboratory failed to perform at least every 6 months the calibration verification procedures for the routine chemistry (Lytes) tests processed by the Dimension EXL 200 system. Refer to D5439. -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access