Labcorp Of America Holdings - Rocky Mount

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

2
Total Citations
13
Total Deficiencyies
7
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 34D2148820
Address 200 Nash Medical Arts Mall, Rocky Mount, NC, 27804
City Rocky Mount
State NC
Zip Code27804
Phone(252) 443-5941

Citation History (2 surveys)

Survey - May 6, 2022

Survey Type: Special

Survey Event ID: UR6L11

Deficiency Tags: D2130 D6000 D6016 D6000 D6016 D2016 D2130

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on desk review of CMS(Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Casper reports 153D and 155D and desk review of 2021 API(American Proficiency Institute) proficiency testing results 5/6/22, the laboratory failed to successfully participate for WBC(White blood cell) differential on two consecutive test events. See the deficiency cited at D2130 D2130 HEMATOLOGY CFR(s): 493.851(f) Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- Failure to achieve satisfactory performance for the same analyte in two consecutive events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on desk review of CMS(Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Casper Reports 153D and 155D and desk review of 2021 API(American Proficiency Institute) proficiency testing results 5/6/22, the laboratory failed to successfully participate for WBC(white blood cell) differential on two consecutive test events, resulting in unsuccessful performance. Findings: Desk review of CMS Casper report 155D and 2021 API proficiency testing results revealed: 1. The laboratory provided unacceptable responses for 5 of 5 Basophils, 5 of 5 Eosinophils, 5 of 5 Lymphocytes, 5 of 5 Monocytes, and 5 of 5 Neutrophils, and received a 0% score for WBC Differential on the 2021 API 2nd Hematology test event. 2. The laboratory provided unacceptable responses for 4 of 5 Basophils, 5 of 5 Eosinophils, 3 of 5 Lymphocytes, 3 of 5 Monocytes, and 3 of 5 Neutrophils, and received a 28% score for WBC Differential on the 2021 API 3rd Hematology test event. D6000 MODERATE COMPLEXITY LABORATORY DIRECTOR CFR(s): 493.1403 The laboratory must have a director who meets the qualification requirements of 493. 1405 of this subpart and provides overall management and direction in accordance with 493.1407 of this subpart. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on desk review of CMS(Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Casper reports 153D and 155D and desk review of 2021 API(American Proficiency Institute) proficiency testing results 5/6/22, the laboratory director failed to provide overall management and direction to ensure successful proficiency testing participation. See the deficiency cited at D6016. D6016 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1407(e)(4)(i) The laboratory director is responsible for the overall operation and administration of the laboratory, including the employment of personnel who are competent to perform test procedures, and record and report test results promptly, accurate, and proficiently and for assuring compliance with the applicable regulations. (e) The laboratory director must-- (e)(4)(i) Ensure that the proficiency testing samples are tested as required under Subpart H of this part; This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on desk review of CMS(Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Casper reports 153D and 155D and desk review of 2021 API(American Proficiency Institute) proficiency testing results 5/6/22, the laboratory director failed to ensure successful participation in proficiency testing as required in Subpart H. Findings: Desk review of CMS Casper report 155D and 2021 API proficiency testing results revealed: 1. The laboratory provided unacceptable responses for 5 of 5 Basophils, 5 of 5 Eosinophils, 5 of 5 Lymphocytes, 5 of 5 Monocytes, and 5 of 5 Neutrophils, and received a 0% score for WBC Differential on the 2021 API 2nd Hematology test event. 2. The laboratory -- 2 of 3 -- provided unacceptable responses for 4 of 5 Basophils, 5 of 5 Eosinophils, 3 of 5 Lymphocytes, 3 of 5 Monocytes, and 3 of 5 Neutrophils, and received a 28% score for WBC Differential on the 2021 API 3rd Hematology test event. -- 3 of 3 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - March 18, 2020

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: OSVS11

Deficiency Tags: D5437 D5437 D6073 D6053 D6053 D6073

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5437 CALIBRATION AND CALIBRATION VERIFICATION CFR(s): 493.1255(a) Unless otherwise specified in this subpart, for each applicable test system the laboratory must perform and document calibration procedures-- (1) Following the manufacturer's test system instructions, using calibration materials provided or specified, and with at least the frequency recommended by the manufacturer; (2) Using the criteria verified or established by the laboratory as specified in 493.1253(b) (3)-- (2)(i) Using calibration materials appropriate for the test system and, if possible, traceable to a reference method or reference material of known value; and (2)(ii) Including the number, type, and concentration of calibration materials, as well as acceptable limits for and the frequency of calibration; and (3) Whenever calibration verification fails to meet the laboratory's acceptable limits for calibration verification. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of 2018, 2019, and 2020 hematology records and interview with TC (technical consultant) #1 on 3/18/20, the laboratory failed to perform and document calibration of the Sysmex XS-1000iC hematology analyzer at least once every six months. Review of hematology records revealed the Sysmex was calibrated at installation on 12/12/18, but was not calibrated again until 13 months later on 1/13/20. During interview at approximately 12:00 p.m., TC #1 stated the instrument was supposed to be calibrated in June 2019. She stated testing personnel said that the instrument was not calibrated because Sysmex service never came to do it. D6053 TECHNICAL CONSULTANT RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1413(b)(9) The technical consultant is responsible for evaluating and documenting the performance of individuals responsible for moderate complexity testing at least semiannually during the first year the individual tests patient specimens. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of personnel records and interview with TC (technical consultant) #1 on 3/18/20, the TC failed to perform and document a semiannual competency evaluation for 1 of 2 testing personnel (TP #2) during the first year of patient testing. Review of personnel records revealed TP #2 was trained in February 2019. There was no documentation of a competency evaluation for TP #2 since the training. During interview at approximately 11:05 a.m., TC #1 confirmed that the semiannual competency evaluation was not performed. She stated the annual competency for TP #2 is due now. D6073 TESTING PERSONNEL RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1425(b)(4) Each individual performing moderate complexity testing must follow the laboratory's established

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access