Laboratory Corporation Of America

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

2
Total Citations
6
Total Deficiencyies
3
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 45D0974783
Address 1901 Medi Park # 2062, Amarillo, TX, 79106
City Amarillo
State TX
Zip Code79106
Phone(806) 359-8567

Citation History (2 surveys)

Survey - March 26, 2021

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: 1BFS11

Deficiency Tags: D5311 D5317 D5311 D5317

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5311 SPECIMEN SUBMISSION, HANDLING, AND REFERRAL CFR(s): 493.1242(a) The laboratory must establish and follow written policies and procedures for each of the following, if applicable: (1) Patient preparation. (2) Specimen collection. (3) Specimen labeling, including patient name or unique patient identifier and, when appropriate, specimen source. (4) Specimen storage and preservation. (5) Conditions for specimen transportation. (6) Specimen processing. (7) Specimen acceptability and rejection. (8) Specimen referral. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Review of policies and procedures, manufacturers instructions for use, observations, review of patient test records and interview of facility personnel found the laboratory failed to establish and follow written policies and procedures for the collection, transportation, storage and handling, acceptability and testing of patient specimens submitted for testing at this laboratory using the Roche cobas Integra 400 chemistry analyzer. The findings included: 1. Review of the policies and procedures found no written instructions available to clients submitting specimens to this laboratory for testing specific to this location. 2. Review of manufacturers instructions for use for the following analytes tested on the Roche cobas Integra 400 found: a. UREAL - in vitro test for the quantitative determination of BUN (blood urea nitrogen) in serum/plasma Under the heading Stability in serum/plasma - 7 days at 20 - 25 degrees C, & days at 4- 8 degrees C, of 1 year at -20 degrees C. b. CO2-L - In vitro test for the quantitative determination of the bicarbonate (HCO3) concentration in serum/plasma Under the heading Stability - 7 days at 4-8 degrees C and 40 hours at 15-25 degreess C. c. BILT - In vitro test for the quantitative determination of Bilirubin in serum/plasma Under the heading Stability - 1 day at 20-25 degrees C, 7 days at 4-8 degrees C and 6 months at -20 degrees C. d. GLUC3 - In vitro test for the quantitative determination of glucose in serum/plasma. Under the heading Stability (no Hemolysis) 8 hours at 25 degrees C and 3 days at 4 degrees C. 3. Observations made during the delivery of Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- specimens picked up from facilities on March 25, 2021 found: a. Delivery at 10:35 - Specimen bag temperature registered 20.5 degrees at 10:36 AM. Contained 1 specimen to be tested for lipid and CMP at reference laboratory b. Delivery made at 10:41 AM found found one patient specimen in the bag. Temperature of the contents of the delivery bag was measured at 19.3 degrees upon opening at 10:36 AM. Included in this bag was one serum separator tube (SST) and one EDTA tube for LCM req # 50083825845-0 ( collected 3/24/2021 at 4:30 PM). Review of the requisition found orders for : Test code CHM U01309BC Amarillo, TX CHM 028142 CBC, Platelet, No differential CHM 322758 Basic Metabolic Panel (8) CHM 998085 Conjuncture c. Delivery at 2:37 PM 6 specimens received in a bag with a measured temperature of 19 degrees. 2. Review of the final report for Control ID 50083825845 found: Date of collection recorded as 3/24/2021 1630 Local Date received: 03/25 /2021 Date reported: 03/25/2021 1210 ET Results for CBC, Platelet, No Differential and Basic Metabolic Panel (8) Review of patient specimens tested on March 24, 2021 found 14 of 14 specimens tested within 8 hours of collection. 3. Review of the Storage and Stability requirements as written in the online portal for Labcorp found: a. BUN - Maintain specimen at room temperature. Storage Instructions Stability 14 days at room temperature, 14 days refrigerated, 14 days frozen. b. CO2 - Maintain specimen at room temperature. Storage Instructions Stability 14 days at room temperature, 14 days refrigerated, 14 days frozen. c. Bilirubin - Maintain specimen at room temperature. Storage Instructions Stability 3 days at room temperature, 3 days refrigerated, 14 days frozen. d. Glucose - Maintain specimen at room temperature. Storage Instructions Stability 14 days at room temperature, 14 days refrigerated, 14 days frozen. 4. Interview of the Laboratory Director conducted on March 24, 2021 at 3:25 PM found the laboratory did not monitor the temperatures of the courier bags used to transport specimens to the laboratory. Couriers did not monitor the temperature of the bags and their contents prior to adding patient specimens or during the transportation of patient specimens. Interview of the laboratory director conducted on March 25, 2021 at 3:12 PM confirmed that the laboratory did not have written instructions available to clients for testing done at the Amarillo location. She confirmed that the only written instructions available to clients were included in the portal, which were not verified at the Amarillo location. D5317 SPECIMEN SUBMISSION, HANDLING, AND REFERRAL CFR(s): 493.1242(d) If the laboratory accepts a referral specimen, written instructions must be available to the laboratory's clients and must include, as appropriate, the information specified in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(7) of this section. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Review of policies and procedures, patient test records and interview facility personnel found the laboratory failed to have written instructions available to the laboratory's clients for the appropriate collection, handling, transportation and storage of specimens submitted for Hematology and Chemistry testing performed at this site. Findings included: 1. Review of policies and procedures found that the laboratory did not have a written instructions available to the laboratory's clients for the appropriate collection, handling, transportation and storage of specimens using analyzers at this laboratory. 2. Interview of the laboratory director conducted on March 25, 2021 at 2: 37 PM confirmed that the laboratory had no written instructions available to clients for specimens submitted for testing at this location. She confirmed that the clients submitting specimens for testing used the criteria as written in the specimen -- 2 of 3 -- requirements in the online portal, but they did not reflect the manufacturers specifications for the equipment used at this laboratory. -- 3 of 3 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - January 10, 2019

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: CX3211

Deficiency Tags: D5421 D5421

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5421 ESTABLISHMENT AND VERIFICATION OF PERFORMANCE CFR(s): 493.1253(b)(1) Each laboratory that introduces an unmodified, FDA-cleared or approved test system must do the following before reporting patient test results: (1)(i) Demonstrate that it can obtain performance specifications comparable to those established by the manufacturer for the following performance characteristics: (1)(i)(A) Accuracy. (1)(i) (B) Precision. (1)(i)(C) Reportable range of test results for the test system. (1)(ii) Verify that the manufacturer's reference intervals (normal values) are appropriate for the laboratory's patient population. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the laboratory's policies and procedures, manufacturer's instructions, verification studies performed by the laboratory and interview of facility personnel, the laboratory failed to follow manufacturer's instructions for verifying the precision, reference range, reportable ranges and accuracy of the Prothrombin Time (PT) tested on the Sysmex CA 620 coagulation analyzer installed in September 2018. The findings included: Precision Verification Based on review of the laboratory's policies and procedures, Siemens CA 620 coagulation analyzer manufacturer's instructions, precision verification study, and confirmed in interview with facility personnel, the laboratory failed to follow manufacturer's instructions for verifying the between run precision for PT and APTT upon installation of the CA 620 analyzer September 2018. The findings included: 1. The laboratory had not written a separate policy / procedure for the use of the Sysmex CA 620 coagulation analyzer , using the manufacturer's Operator Guide as its own procedure 2. Review of the manufacturer's instruction guideline titled "Precision Verification" (1/2013), states the following: on page III-1 "Between-run precision measure the degree of imprecision over time and requires testing over a minimum of five days." on page III-2 "The laboratory should determine Between Run Precision over a minimum of 5 days using 4 replicates of each level of control More runs and days will increase confidence in the results. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- Record results on the appropriate Precision Worksheet." Further review of instructions found on page III-2, "5. The laboratory should determine Between Run Precision over a minimum of 5 days using 4 replicates of each level of control. More runs and days will increase confidence in the results. Calculation of Precision 1. Calculate the Mean, SD, and %CV for controls. 2. Calculate the acceptable limits of error. Regulated analytes are PT, APTT & Fibrinogen. according the the manufacturer, the acceptable limit for within run precision is: PT + 2% APTT + 2%" 3. Based on a review of the verification studies for the Sysmex CA 620, the laboratory performed within run precision studies, but did not assess between run precision. 4. Interview of the Laboratory Director conducted on January 10, 2019 at 10:47 AM confirmed the laboratory did not evaluate the data for the within run precision, and did not assess the between run precision over a minimum of 5 days as required by the manufacturer. Method Verification 1. Review of the manufacturer's instructions for Method verification found the following instructions to the laboratory on page IV-1: "Performance of a method verification study defines the relationship between a system currently in use and a new system. Accuracy is closeness to the true value. The PT and APTT are screening tests with no recognized reference method to determine accuracy. Best results for method verification studies require a minimum of 40 patient samples (20 normal and 20 abnormal). Range should be from below to substantially above the expected reference range. Studies should be performed over several days. Samples should be tested on the current system, followed immediately, but by no more than 1/2 to 1 hour later by testing on the new system. Clotting factor activity can deteriorate over time affecting APTT values and to a lesser extent, the PT. Run Tests as appropriate following the recommended operating procedure (see application sheets). Record results on worksheets. Perform regression analysis." 2. Review of the laboratory's own method verification found no documentation of review. 3. Interview of the Technical Consultant conducted on January 10, 2019 at 10:47 AM confirmed the laboratory did not evaluate the data for the method verification for acceptability. Reference Interval 1. Based on a review of the manufacturer's instructions titled "Reference Interval" (1/2013), the document states the following: "A reference interval must be established for Fibrinogen, Prothrombin Times, APTT's, D-Dimer's and Thrombin Times by each institution. Some tests, such as factor assays, do not require that each individual lab perform a reference interval study, as clinical investigations have established reference values that are widely accepted by the medical community. Requirements: Donors must be from a healthy population (no known pathological condition; no pre-surgical or hospitalized patients) Donors should not take any medications, including aspirin. A minimum of 20 donors with a reasonable even distribution of males and females should be included. Donors should span the adult age range. (NOTE: a separate range should be established for pediatric populations). The FDA defines pediatric as up to 21 years of age. Testing should be performed over a period of several days and by different people, if possible to allow for day to day variation. A minimum of 4-6 specimens should be drawn each testing day, following the established laboratory protocol for collection, storage, and processing of patient plasma samples. The test result from the donors should be analyzed statistically and verification of the mean (plus/minus) 2 SD or 95 percent confidence limit should be calculated. Software that performs this calculation can be used to verify the Laboratory or the IFU (instructions for use) reference interval. Note: Because the reference interval is defined with a plus/minus 2SD, values falling outside this range may or may not be normal and should be further evaluated. Statistically, a certain percentage of these patients will be normal. However, by defining the normal ranges in this manner, patients' who are abnormal will be less likely to go undetected. (See CLSI document C28-A.)." 2. Review of the laboratory's own reference interval studies foundthat the laboratory had defined a reference -- 2 of 3 -- interval of 9.1 - 12.0 seconds for Prothrombin Time, but had no documentation as to how this range was determined. 3. Interview of the Laboratory Director conducted on January 10, 2019 at 10:47 AM confirmed the laboratory did not know how these numbers were decided upon as the laboratory's reference intervals. Reportable Range 1. Review of the manufacturer's instructions titled Reportable Range found on page VI-1 found the following instruction to the laboratory: "Reportable range determination is addressed both in CLIA requirements and CLSI Guidelines. While CLIA requires the laboratory to verify the Reportable Range, the method used is not explicit, and leaves this up to the individual laboratories." 2. Review of the records provided for the verification of the Sysmex CA 620 found no documentation of reportable range verification. 3. Interview of the Laboratory Director conducted on January 1o, 2019 at 10:47 AM confirmed that the laboratory had not verified the reportable ranges for PT and APTT using the Sysmex CA 620 coagulation analyzer. -- 3 of 3 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access