Lowcountry Hematology And Oncology Bssfh

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 The following deficiencies are a result of a desk review of proficiency testing scores obtained from the national database and verified with the proficiency testing company. The facility was found to be out of compliance with the conditions of the CLIA program. The following CONDITION LEVEL DEFICIENCIES were found to be out of compliance: D2016 - 42 C.F.R. 493.803 Condition: Successful participation [proficiency testing] D6000 - 42 C.F.R. 493.1403 Condition: Laboratories performing moderate complexity testing; laboratory director D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on a proficiency testing desk review of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- (CMS) form 0155 and College of American Pathologists (CAP) 2022 records, the laboratory had not successfully participated in a proficiency testing program approved by HHS, for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. The laboratory failed to successfully participate in the specialty of Hematology for the Hematocrit (HCT) analyte. Refer to D2130. D2130 HEMATOLOGY CFR(s): 493.851(f) Failure to achieve satisfactory performance for the same analyte in two consecutive events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a proficiency testing desk review of CMS form 0155 and College of American Pathologists (CAP) 2022 records, revealed that the laboratory failed to achieve satisfactory performance (80% or greater) for the same analyte for two of two consecutive testing events in the specialty of Hematology for the HCT analyte. Findings included: 1. Review of the CMS 0155 report revealed the following results: Hematology 2022 - 2nd Event the laboratory received an unsatisfactory score of 40% for the HCT. Hematology 2022 - 3rd Event the laboratory received an unsatisfactory score of 60% for the HCT. 2. A review of the College of American Pathologists (CAP) 2022 proficiency testing records (FH1-B 2022 and FH1-C 2022Hematology Auto Differentials) confirmed the laboratory received the above results. D6000 MODERATE COMPLEXITY LABORATORY DIRECTOR CFR(s): 493.1403 The laboratory must have a director who meets the qualification requirements of 493. 1405 of this subpart and provides overall management and direction in accordance with 493.1407 of this subpart. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on a proficiency testing desk review of CMS form 0155 and College of American Pathologists (CAP) 2022 records, revealed that the laboratory director failed to provide overall management and direction of the laboratory services. Refer to D6016. D6016 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1407(e)(4)(i) The laboratory director is responsible for the overall operation and administration of the laboratory, including the employment of personnel who are competent to perform test procedures, and record and report test results promptly, accurate, and proficiently and for assuring compliance with the applicable regulations. (e) The laboratory director must-- (e)(4)(i) Ensure that the proficiency testing samples are tested as required under Subpart H of this part; This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a proficiency testing desk review of CMS form 0155 and College of American Pathologists (CAP) 2022 records, revealed that the laboratory director -- 2 of 3 -- failed to ensure the overall quality of the laboratory services provided. The laboratory director failed to ensure successful participation in an HHS approved proficiency testing program. Refer to D2130. -- 3 of 3 --

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: During a proficiency testing desk review performed on 05/30/2019, based on review of CASPER report 155D and graded reports from College of American Pathologists (CAP), it was determined that the laboratory failed to successfully participate in proficiency testing for the specialty of hematology, the analyte red blood cell (RBC) for two out of three consecutive proficiency testing events reviewed (2018, Event 2 and 2019, Event 1). See D2121 and D2130. D2121 HEMATOLOGY CFR(s): 493.851(a) Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- Failure to attain a score of at least 80 percent of acceptable responses for each analyte in each testing event is unsatisfactory analyte performance for the testing event. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: During a proficiency testing desk review performed on 05/30/2019, based on review of the CASPER report 155D and laboratory proficiency testing records (graded report from College of American Pathologist), it was determined that the laboratory failed to attain a score of at least 80 percent in proficiency testing for the specialty of hematology, the analyte red blood cell (RBC) for two out of three consecutive proficiency testing events (2018, Event 2 and 2019, Event 1). The findings include: 1. Review of CASPER report 155D revealed the following RBC proficiency scores for your laboratory: a. 2018, Event 2: 20% b. 2019, Event 1: 60% 2. The scores were confirmed upon review of the graded CAP reports. Scores less than 80% for these analytes indicate failure or unsatisfactory performance. A failure of the analytes for two consecutive or two out of three testing events is scored as unsuccessful. A failure of the analyte for three consecutive or three out of four/five events is scored as a repeat unsuccessfuL D2130 HEMATOLOGY CFR(s): 493.851(f) Failure to achieve satisfactory performance for the same analyte in two consecutive events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: During the desk review performed on 05/30/19, based on review of CASPER report 155D and graded API results, it was determined that the laboratory failed to achieve satisfactory performance for red blood cell count in two out of three consecutive testing events (2018, Event 2 and 2019, Event 1) resulting in unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. See D2121. -- 2 of 2 --