Mclaren Macomb

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

2
Total Citations
4
Total Deficiencyies
4
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 23D2277972
Address 21510 Harrington, Clinton Township, MI, 48036
City Clinton Township
State MI
Zip Code48036
Phone(586) 791-5250

Citation History (2 surveys)

Survey - August 11, 2025

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: 3VG511

Deficiency Tags: D5439 D6020 D5417

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5417 TEST SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, REAGENT CFR(s): 493.1252(d) (d) Reagents, solutions, culture media, control materials, calibration materials, and other supplies must not be used when they have exceeded their expiration date, have deteriorated, or are of substandard quality. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: . Based on observation and interview with the phlebotomy staff, the laboratory failed to ensure blood specimen tubes had not exceeded expiration dates for three pearl- white BD Vacutainer tubes out of 18 total tubes at the phlebotomy station. Findings include: 1. The surveyor observed three pearl-white BD Vacutainer tubes with the expiration date of 4/30/25 on the table in the phlebotomy station on 8/11/25 at 9:32 am. 2. An interview on 8/11/25 at 9:35 am with the phlebotomy staff confirmed the tubes had been expired and indicated they were used to collect specimens for Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) testing. D5439 CALIBRATION AND CALIBRATION VERIFICATION CFR(s): 493.1255(b) (b)(1) Following the manufacturer's calibration verification instructions; (b)(2) Using the criteria verified or established by the laboratory under 493.1253(b)(3)-- (b)(2)(i) Including the number, type, and concentration of the materials, as well as acceptable limits for calibration verification; and (b)(2)(ii) Including at least a minimal (or zero) value, a mid-point value, and a maximum value near the upper limit of the range to verify the laboratory's reportable range of test results for the test system; and (b)(3) At least once every 6 months and whenever any of the following occur: (b)(3)(i) A complete change of reagents for a procedure is introduced, unless the laboratory can demonstrate that changing reagent lot numbers does not affect the range used to report patient test results, and control values are not adversely affected by reagent lot number Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- changes. (b)(3)(ii) There is major preventive maintenance or replacement of critical parts that may influence test performance. (b)(3)(iii) Control materials reflect an unusual trend or shift, or are outside of the laboratory's acceptable limits, and other means of assessing and correcting unacceptable control values fail to identify and correct the problem. (b)(3)(iv) The laboratory's established schedule for verifying the reportable range for patient test results requires more frequent calibration verification. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: . Based on record review and interview with the technical consultant, the laboratory failed to perform and document calibration verification for its Stat Sensor creatinine testing at least every six months for one (June 2025) of four calibration verification events reviewed. Findings include: 1. A review of the laboratory's Stat Sensor creatinine calibration verification documentation revealed the most recent event was dated 1/29/25. 2. The surveyor requested documentation of calibration performed from the 1/29/25 date on 8/11/25 at 12:27 pm and it was not made available. 3. An interview on 8/11/25 at 12:32 pm with the technical consultant confirmed the laboratory had not performed and documentation calibration verification at least every six months for its Stat Sensor creatinine testing. D6020 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1407(e)(5) (e)(5) Ensure that the quality control and quality assessment programs are established and maintained to assure the quality of laboratory services provided and to identify failures in quality as they occur; This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: . Based on record review and interview with the technical consultant, the laboratory director failed to ensure the quality assessment program established was maintained for two (August 2023 to August 2025) of two years reviewed. Findings include: 1. A review of the laboratory's "POC Policy" revealed a section titled "XXXII. Quality Management" stating, 1. "The Quality Management Program is designed to continuously evaluate and improve performance by: a. Promoting positive patient outcomes through the application of optimal service based on clinically sound principles and best practices. b. Focusing on pre-analytic, analytic, and/or post- analytic indicators related to improved service outcomes and the prevention and reduction of errors. c. Identifying and evaluating errors, incidents and other unusual occurrences that may interfere with patient care services. d. Identifying, on an ongoing basis and in a coordinated and collaborative manner, areas for improvement in the quality of care, safety and services provided. e. Offering continuing education opportunities for staff. f. The Quality Management Program and quality improvement presses are coordinated with, and supportive or, McLaren process improvement practices. g. Works with the laboratory Quality Best Practice committee to determine system key indicators, review issues, assist with

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - December 5, 2023

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: K1C711

Deficiency Tags: D5209

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5209 PERSONNEL COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT POLICIES CFR(s): 493.1235 As specified in the personnel requirements in subpart M, the laboratory must establish and follow written policies and procedures to assess employee and, if applicable, consultant competency. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: . Based on record review and interview with the Technical Consultant, the laboratory failed to establish competency assessment policies to assess the competency of its staff serving as clinical and technical consultants for 1 (November 2023 to December 2023) of 1 month since the laboratory began testing. Findings include: 1. A review of the laboratory's personnel competency assessments revealed a lack of assessments for the Clinical Consultant and the Technical Consultant. 2. An interview on 12/5/23 at 10:50 am with the Technical Consultant confirmed the laboratory had not established a competency assessment procedure to include assessing clinical and technical consultants. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 1 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access