Milford Pediatric Group

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

3
Total Citations
31
Total Deficiencyies
31
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 07D0698130
Address 50 Commerce Park, Milford, CT, 06460
City Milford
State CT
Zip Code06460
Phone203 882-2066
Lab DirectorHARRY KIPPERMAN

Citation History (3 surveys)

Survey - February 13, 2025

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: HCUF11

Deficiency Tags: D5291 D5401

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5291 GENERAL LABORATORY SYSTEMS QUALITY ASSESSMENT CFR(s): 493.1239(a) The laboratory must establish and follow written policies and procedures for an ongoing mechanism to monitor, assess, and, when indicated, correct problems identified in the general laboratory systems requirements specified at 493.1231 through 493.1236. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and staff interview, the laboratory failed to establish policies and procedure to monitor and assess unacceptable proficiency testing results in the specialty of hematology. Findings Include: 1. Record review on 02/13/2025 of the laboratory's 'College of American Pathologists' proficiency testing (PT) evaluation report for 'FH1-C 2024' revealed the following unacceptable results: a. 'Test: White Blood Cell Count, Specimen: FH1-11'. b. 'Test: Red Blood Cell Count, Specimen: FH1-11/FH1-12'. c. 'Test: Hemoglobin, Specimen: FH1-11/FH1-12'. d. 'Test: Hematocrit, Specimen: FH1-11/FH1-12'. e. 'Test: Neut/Gran %, Specimen: FH1-11 /FH1-12'. f. 'Test: Neut/Gran Absolute, Specimen: FH1-12'. g. 'Test: Lymph %, Specimen: FH1-11/FH1-12'. h. 'Test: Mixed/Mono %, Specimen: FH1-12'. i. 'Test: Mixed/Mono Absolute, Specimen: FH1-12'. 2. Record review on 02/13/2025 of the laboratory's standard operating procedures revealed lack of documentation of an established policies and procedures to monitor and assess issues related to proficiency testing performance. 3. Record review on 02/13/2025 of the laboratory's '

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - February 11, 2019

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: ITKX11

Deficiency Tags: D2009 D3031 D5211 D5403 D5469 D5775 D5791 D6000 D6013 D6016 D6019 D6025 D6078 D2007 D2122 D5209 D5400 D5411 D5481 D5781 D5891 D6004 D6014 D6018 D6021 D6076

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D2007 TESTING OF PROFICIENCY TESTING SAMPLES CFR(s): 493.801(b)(1) The samples must be examined or tested with the laboratory's regular patient workload by personnel who routinely perform the testing in the laboratory, using the laboratory's routine methods This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and staff interview, proficiency testing (PT) samples were not tested in the same manner as patient samples. Findings include: 1. Record review on 2 /6/19 of the laboratory's 2017 and 2018 College of American Pathologists (CAP) PT records revealed: a. 2 of 4 bacteriology TP did not perform PT testing in 2018. b. PT hematology results were submitted for evaluation in 2017 and 2018 for 1 of 10 TP. The same TP's results were submitted for all events. c. 7 of 10 hematology TP tested the same PT samples as internal blind samples prior to the CAP PT program due date for 2017. d. 4 of 10 hematology TP tested the same PT samples as internal blind samples prior to the CAP PT program due date for 2018. 2. Staff interview with the office manager on 2/6/18 at 11:15 AM confirmed the above findings. 3. The laboratory performs 36,985 hematology tests and 6,738 bacteriology cultures annually. 4. This is a repeat violation. D2009 TESTING OF PROFICIENCY TESTING SAMPLES CFR(s): 493.801(b)(1) The individual testing or examining the samples and the laboratory director must attest to the routine integration of the samples into the patient workload using the laboratory's routine methods. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 13 -- Based on record review and staff interview, the laboratory failed to attest that proficiency testing (PT) samples were performed in the same manner as patient specimens. Findings include: 1. Record review on 2/6/19 of the laboratory's 2017 College of American Pathologists (CAP) microbiology combination attestation sheets revealed the 2017-Event A PT attestation sheet was not signed by the laboratory director. 2. Staff interview on 2/6/19 at 1:00 PM with the office manager confirmed the above finding. 3. The laboratory performs 6,738 cultures annually in the subspecialty of bacteriology. D2122 HEMATOLOGY CFR(s): 493.851(b) Failure to attain an overall testing event score of at least 80 percent is unsatisfactory performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and staff interview the laboratory failed to achieve a score of at least an 80 on proficiency testing (PT) in the specialty of hematology. Findings include: 1. Record review on 2/6/19 of the laboratory's College of American Pathologist (CAP) PT results revealed the laboratory received an unsatisfactory score of 63 for FH1-A 2018 Hematology Auto Differentials. 2. Staff interview on 2/6/19 at 2:00 PM with the office manager confirmed the above finding. 3. The laboratory performs 36,985 tests annually in the specialty of hematology. D3031 RETENTION REQUIREMENTS CFR(s): 493.1105(a)(3) Analytic systems records. Retain quality control and patient test records (including instrument printouts, if applicable) and records documenting all analytic systems activities specified in 493.1252 through 493.1289 for at least 2 years. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and staff interview the laboratory failed retain quality control (QC) records at least for two years in the specialty of hematology. Findings include: 1. Record review of the laboratory's hematology quality control records on 2/11/19 revealed the laboratory did not have daily QC records for the Sysmex XP300 (SN B3583) analyzer from 12/16/17 through 4/25/18. 2. Staff interview with the laboratory supervisor (LS) on 2/11/19 at 11:15 AM confirmed the above finding. The LS further stated QC records were inadvertently deleted and not recoverable. D5209 PERSONNEL COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT POLICIES CFR(s): 493.1235 As specified in the personnel requirements in subpart M, the laboratory must establish and follow written policies and procedures to assess employee and, if applicable, consultant competency. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and staff interview, the laboratory failed to have a policy in place to assess the competency of all laboratory personnel. Findings include: 1. -- 2 of 13 -- Review on 2/6/19 of the laboratory's competency records revealed: a. The laboratory did not a have policy in place to assess the competency of the technical consultant (TC) or clinical consultant (CC). b. Competency documentation for the TC and CC was not available. 2. Staff interview with the office manager on 2/6/19 confirmed the above findings. 3. This is a repeat violation. D5211 EVALUATION OF PROFICIENCY TESTING PERFORMANCE CFR(s): 493.1236(a) The laboratory must review and evaluate the results obtained on proficiency testing performed as specified in subpart H of this part. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and staff interview the laboratory failed to document review of proficiency test (PT) Scores. Findings include: 1. Record review on 2/6/19 of laboratory's 2017 and 2018 College of American Pathologists (CAP) hematology PT scores revealed: a. FH2-A 2017 i. Specimen FH2-05 MCV was unacceptable. ii. Specimens FH2-01 through FH2-05 had an incorrect response due to failure to provide a valid response code for MCHC and RDW. b. FH2-B 2017 i. Specimens FH2-06 through FH2-10 had an incorrect response due to failure to provide a valid response code for MCHC. c. FH1-A 2018 i. Overall score of 63. ii. Specimen FH1-05 MCV was unacceptable. iii. Specimens FH1-01 through FH1-05 had an incorrect response due to failure to provide a valid response code for RBC, hematocrit and RDW. d. The laboratory failed to investigate and/or evaluate the results obtained. e. The results were signed as reviewed by the laboratory director. 2. Staff interview with the laboratory supervisor (LS) and office manager on 2/6/19 at 1:00 PM confirmed the above findings. The LS stated he/she was unaware results could be checked against the participant summary. 3. The laboratory performs 36,985 tests annually in the specialty of hematology. D5400 ANALYTIC SYSTEMS CFR(s): 493.1250 Each laboratory that performs nonwaived testing must meet the applicable analytic systems requirements in 493.1251 through 493.1283, unless HHS approves a procedure, specified in Appendix C of the State Operations Manual (CMS Pub.7), that provides equivalent quality testing. The laboratory must monitor and evaluate the overall quality of the analytic systems and correct identified problems as specified in 493.1289 for each specialty and subspecialty of testing performed. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, the laboratory failed to monitor and evaluate the overall quality of the analytic systems and correct identified problems as specified in 493.1289 for each specialty and subspecialty of testing performed. The cumulative effect of this lack of oversight resulted in the laboratory's inability to ensure accuracy and reliability of patient test results in the specialty of hematology and the subspecialty of bacteriology. Refer to D5403, D5411, D5481, D5469, D5775, D5781 and D5791. D5403 PROCEDURE MANUAL CFR(s): 493.1251(b) -- 3 of 13 -- The procedure manual must include the following when applicable to the test procedure: (1) Requirements for patient preparation; specimen collection, labeling, storage, preservation, transportation, processing, and referral; and criteria for specimen acceptability and rejection as described in 493.1242. (2) Microscopic examination, including the detection of inadequately prepared slides. (3) Step-by-step performance of the procedure, including test calculations and interpretation of results. (4) Preparation of slides, solutions, calibrators, controls, reagents, stains, and other materials used in testing. (5) Calibration and calibration verification procedures. (6) The reportable range for test results for the test system as established or verified in 493.1253. (7) Control procedures. (8)

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - July 24, 2018

Survey Type: Special

Survey Event ID: 7GX711

Deficiency Tags: D2016 D2028 D2020

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on proficiency testing (PT) record desk review, the laboratory failed to successfully achieve a score of 80 percent (%) in two of three testing events for 2017- 2018 in the subspecialty of bacteriology, specifically 2017 Event 3: 77% and 2018 Event 1: 77%. Refer to D2020 and D2028. D2020 BACTERIOLOGY CFR(s): 493.823(a) Failure to attain an overall testing event score of at least 80 percent is unsatisfactory Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on proficiency testing (PT) record review for calendar years 2017 and 2018, the laboratory failed to obtain a satisfactory PT score of 80% in the subspecialty of bacteriology. Findings include: 1. Record review of the College of American Pathologists (CAP) PT evaluation report obtained from the laboratory on 7/20/18 revealed the laboratory failed to obtain a score of 80% resulting in unsatisfactory performance for the regulated analytes of throat and urine culture. Year/Event # PT Score 2017 - Event -3 77% 2018 - Event -1 77% 2. Record review of the above report on 7/20/18 revealed the laboratory put in place the same

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access