Neal S Taub, Md, Pa

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

3
Total Citations
24
Total Deficiencyies
13
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 34D1068412
Address 3535 Randolph Road, Suite 208, Charlotte, NC, 28211
City Charlotte
State NC
Zip Code28211
Phone704 442-9805
Lab DirectorNEAL TAUB

Citation History (3 surveys)

Survey - February 15, 2024

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: WY9D11

Deficiency Tags: D5217 D6072

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5217 EVALUATION OF PROFICIENCY TESTING PERFORMANCE CFR(s): 493.1236(c)(1) At least twice annually, the laboratory must verify the accuracy of any test or procedure it performs that is not included in subpart I of this part. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based upon review of 2022 and 2023 API (American Proficiency Institute) PT (proficiency testing) records, review of the laboratory's test menu, review of data to verify performance specifications and interview with TP#1 (Testing Personnel) on 2 /15/24, the laboratory failed to verify the accuracy of 1 of 8 analytes performed on the Viva-E instrument twice annually. Findings: Review of 2022 and 2023 API-PT records confirmed the laboratory's enrollment of the following urine analytes: 1. Amphetamine/Methamphetamine 2. Benzodiazepines 3. Buprenorphine 4. Cannabinoids 5. Cocaine Metabolites 6. Methadone 7. Opiates Review of the laboratory's test menu revealed that the laboratory also performs testing for urine oxycodone. Review of data to verify the performance specifications of urine oxycodone revealed the laboratory implemented this analyte in October 2022. In interview at approximately 9:45 a.m., TP#1 confirmed the following: 1. The laboratory has not enrolled urine oxycodone into API-PT. 2. The laboratory does not assess the accuracy of urine oxycodone in any manner twice annually. D6072 TESTING PERSONNEL RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1425(b)(3) Each individual performing moderate complexity testing must adhere to the laboratory's quality control policies, document all quality control activities, instrument and procedural calibrations and maintenance performed. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based upon review of the Viva-E Reference Guide, review of 2022 and 2023 Viva-E maintenance logs and interview with TP#1 (Testing Personnel) on 2/15/24, TP#1 failed to document the performance of all Viva-E instrument maintenance. Findings: Review of the Viva-E Reference Guide revealed a Maintenance section that detailed required maintenance at the following time intervals: 1. Daily 2. Weekly 3. Monthly 4. Quarterly Review of 2022 and 2023 Viva-E maintenance logs revealed the documentation of daily and weekly tasks. In interview at approximately 10:05 a.m., TP#1 confirmed the following: 1. He performs all maintenance tasks. 2. He does not document monthly and quarterly maintenance tasks. -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - February 24, 2022

Survey Type: Complaint, Standard

Survey Event ID: X6CC11

Deficiency Tags: D2015 D5400 D5411 D5413 D5417 D5439 D6000 D6018 D6021 D6023 D2015 D5400 D5411 D5413 D5417 D5439 D6000 D6018 D6021 D6023

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D2015 TESTING OF PROFICIENCY TESTING SAMPLES CFR(s): 493.801(b)(5)(6) (5) The laboratory must document the handling, preparation, processing, examination, and each step in the testing and reporting of results for all proficiency testing samples. The laboratory must maintain a copy of all records, including a copy of the proficiency testing program report forms used by the laboratory to record proficiency testing results including the attestation statement provided by the PT program, signed by the analyst and the laboratory director, documenting that proficiency testing samples were tested in the same manner as patient specimens, for a minimum of two years from the date of the proficiency testing event. (6) PT is required for only the test system, assay, or examination used as the primary method for patient testing during the PT event. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of laboratory's procedures, review of laboratory records and absence of documentation 2/24/22, the laboratory failed to maintain all PT (proficiency testing) records and failed to ensure the laboratory director and testing personnel signed the attestation statements for 4 of 4 testing events in 2020 and 2021. Findings: Review of the laboratory's Proficiency Testing Policy revealed, "Proficiency Testing Procedure and Guidelines"...2.. The individual testing or examining the samples and the Laboratory Director must attest to the routine integration of samples into the patients' workload using the laboratory's routine methods....5. The laboratory personnel will document the handling, preparation, processing, examination, and each step in the testing and reporting of results for all proficiency testing samples. The laboratory will maintain a copy of all records for a minimum of two years from the date of the proficiency testing event..." Review of laboratory records revealed no documentation on file for the 2020 and 2021 API (American Proficiency Testing) PT events. The laboratory was able to contact API during the survey to obtain a copy of the graded PT results. The laboratory failed to maintain the PT report forms used by Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 7 -- the laboratory to record PT results, copies of the instrument printouts, the confirmation of the electronic submission of the PT results to the PT vendor, and the review of the graded results by the laboratory director and testing personnel, and failed to ensure the laboratory director and testing personnel signed the attestation statements for the following: a. 2020 API Chemistry Miscellaneous 1st and 2nd events; b. 2021 API Chemistry Miscellaneous 1st and 2nd events. D5400 ANALYTIC SYSTEMS CFR(s): 493.1250 Each laboratory that performs nonwaived testing must meet the applicable analytic systems requirements in 493.1251 through 493.1283, unless HHS approves a procedure, specified in Appendix C of the State Operations Manual (CMS Pub.7), that provides equivalent quality testing. The laboratory must monitor and evaluate the overall quality of the analytic systems and correct identified problems as specified in 493.1289 for each specialty and subspecialty of testing performed. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of policies and procedures, review of 2020, 2021, and 2022 laboratory records, observation, and interviews with the laboratory director 2/24/22, the laboratory failed to monitor and evaluate the overall quality of the urine toxicology testing performed on the Siemens Viva-E analyzer and failed to identify problems and implement

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - January 15, 2020

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: 7KKQ11

Deficiency Tags: D6046 D6046

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D6046 TECHNICAL CONSULTANT RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1413(b)(8) (b) The technical consultant is responsible for-- (b)(8) Evaluating the competency of all testing personnel and assuring that the staff maintain their competency to perform test procedures and report test results promptly, accurately and proficiently. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of laboratory procedure, review of testing personnel (TP) competency records and interview with TP 1/15/20, the technical consultant (laboratory director) failed to evaluate TP competency as required for 2 of 2 TP. Findings: Review of laboratory procedure, "Laboratory Competency Policy" revealed "3. A Six Month & Annual Laboratory Competency Assessment will be conducted at six months and then yearly on each employee performing patient testing." Review of TP competency records revealed TP #1 was hired in January of 2018. There was no documentation of a 6 month competency due in June of 2018 and no documentation of a yearly competency in 2019. Review of TP competency records revealed no documentation of yearly competency for 2018 and 2019 for TP #2. Interview with TP #2 at approximately 11:00 a.m. confirmed the technical consultant (laboratory director) had not evaluated the competency as required. She stated that she had forgotten to remind him that it needed to be done. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 1 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access