North Jefferson Medical Center

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

3
Total Citations
10
Total Deficiencyies
8
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 11D0913200
Address 406 East Broad St, Wrens, GA, 30833
City Wrens
State GA
Zip Code30833
Phone706 547-7008
Lab DirectorTIMOTHY KINSEY

Citation History (3 surveys)

Survey - July 9, 2024

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: 5MWN11

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D6031

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A recertification survey was performed on , July 09, 2024. The facility was found to be NOT in compliance with all applicable CLIA requirements for specialties /subspecialties for 42 CFR. D6031 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1407(e)(13) The laboratory director is responsible for the overall operation and administration of the laboratory, including the employment of personnel who are competent to perform test procedures, and record and report test results promptly, accurate, and proficiently and for assuring compliance with the applicable regulations. (e) The laboratory director must-- (e)(13) Ensure that an approved procedure manual is available to all personnel responsible for any aspect of the testing process; This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the Personnel Records, and staff interview, the laboratory had changed Laboratory Director (LD), effective April 1, 2024. The new LD, has not signed off on the Policies and Procedures at the time of the survey, July 09, 2024. Findings: 1. A review of the personnel records confirmed the facility hired a new LD on April 1, 2024. The new LD hired on April 1, 2024 has not reviewed and signed off on the Standard Operating Policies and Procedures. 2. Interview with the Laboratory Manager, on 07/09/2024, at approximately 1:30 pm, in the doctor's lounge, confirmed the statement above. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 1 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - August 24, 2022

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: BC4C11

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D3011 D5311

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) recertification survey was completed on August 24, 2022. The laboratory was not in compliance with applicable CLIA requirements found at 42 CFR 493.1 through 42 CFR 493.1780. The following deficiencies were cited: D3011 FACILITIES CFR(s): 493.1101(d) Safety procedures must be established, accessible, and observed to ensure protection from physical, chemical, biochemical, and electrical hazards, and biohazardous materials. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on the review of the Standard Operating Procedure(SOP) and staff interview, the laboratory failed to establish a safety procedure for an Eyewash. The Findings include: 1. SOP document review revealed that the laboratory failed to establish a safety procedure for an Eyewash for the laboratory. 2. During an interview with Testing Personnel#1(CMS-209) on August 24, 2022 at approximately 3:30 PM in a back doctor's office, confirmed that the laboratory failed to establish a safety procedure for an Eyewash. D5311 SPECIMEN SUBMISSION, HANDLING, AND REFERRAL CFR(s): 493.1242(a) The laboratory must establish and follow written policies and procedures for each of the following, if applicable: (1) Patient preparation. (2) Specimen collection. (3) Specimen labeling, including patient name or unique patient identifier and, when appropriate, specimen source. (4) Specimen storage and preservation. (5) Conditions for specimen transportation. (6) Specimen processing. (7) Specimen acceptability and rejection. (8) Specimen referral. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the general laboratory standard operating procedure manual (SOP) and staff interview, the laboratory failed to establish written instructions for sending specimens to an outside reference laboratory for testing The findings include: 1. The SOP did not include a written policy and procedure (to include collection, preservation, storage, transport, testing schedule times, or how to obtain additional assistance) for staff to follow when sending specimens to reference laboratory (LabCorp). 2. During an interview on August 24, 2022 at: 2:30 PM with Testing Personnel#1(CMS-209) in a back doctor's office, confirmed that the laboratory did not have a written policy and procedure for staff to follow when sending specimens to reference laboratories. -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - January 14, 2019

Survey Type: Special

Survey Event ID: 9WNX11

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D2016 D2130 D6000 D6016

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A proficiency testing desk review was completed on January 14, 2019. At the time of the review, the laboratory was not in compliance with the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988, 42 CFR 493.1 through 42 CFR 493.1780. The following deficiencies were cited: D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on proficiency testing desk review using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Casper Reports 155 and 153 and review of the laboratory's proficiency testing (PT) reports, the laboratory failed to maintain satisfactory performance in two consecutive events (2nd and 3rd events of 2018), resulting in the Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- first unsuccessful occurrence for cell identification or white blood cell differential (DIFF) # 765. Findings include: Refer to D 2130 D2130 HEMATOLOGY CFR(s): 493.851(f) Failure to achieve satisfactory performance for the same analyte in two consecutive events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on proficiency testing desk review using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Casper Reports 155 and 153 and review of the laboratory's proficiency testing (PT) reports from the American Proficiency Institute (API), the laboratory failed to maintain satisfactory performance in two consecutive events (2nd and 3rd events of 2018), resulting in the first unsuccessful occurrence for cell identification or white blood cell differential (DIFF) # 765. Findings include: 1. Desk review of Casper Reports 153 and 155 disclosed the laboratory failed analyte # 765 DIFF on event 2 of 2018 with a score of 67% and event 3 of 2018 with a score of 53%. 2. Desk review of the laboratory's proficiency testing reports from API confirmed the laboratory failed DIFF on events 2 and 3 of 2018 resulting in the first unsuccessful performance. D6000 MODERATE COMPLEXITY LABORATORY DIRECTOR CFR(s): 493.1403 The laboratory must have a director who meets the qualification requirements of 493. 1405 of this subpart and provides overall management and direction in accordance with 493.1407 of this subpart. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on proficiency testing desk review using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Casper Reports 155 and 153 and review of the laboratory's proficiency testing (PT) reports from the American Proficiency Institute (API), the laboratory director failed to ensure the laboratory maintained satisfactory performance in two consecutive events (2nd and 3rd events of 2018), resulting in the first unsuccessful occurrence for cell identification or white blood cell differential (DIFF) # 765. Findings include: Refer to D 6016 D6016 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1407(e)(4)(i) The laboratory director is responsible for the overall operation and administration of the laboratory, including the employment of personnel who are competent to perform test procedures, and record and report test results promptly, accurate, and proficiently and for assuring compliance with the applicable regulations. (e) The laboratory director must-- (e)(4)(i) Ensure that the proficiency testing samples are tested as required under Subpart H of this part; This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on proficiency testing desk review using the Centers for Medicare and -- 2 of 3 -- Medicaid (CMS) Casper Reports 155 and 153 and review of the laboratory's proficiency testing (PT) reports from the American Proficiency Institute (API), the laboratory director failed to ensure the laboratory maintained satisfactory performance in two consecutive events (2nd and 3rd events of 2018), resulting in the first unsuccessful occurrence for cell identification or white blood cell differential (DIFF) # 765. Findings include: 1. Desk review of Casper Reports 153 and 155 disclosed the laboratory failed analyte # 765 DIFF on event 2 of 2018 with a score of 67% and event 3 of 2018 with a score of 53%. 2. Desk review of the laboratory's proficiency testing reports from API confirmed the laboratory failed DIFF on events 2 and 3 of 2018 resulting in the first unsuccessful performance. -- 3 of 3 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access