Ochsner Choctaw General

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

4
Total Citations
9
Total Deficiencyies
8
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 01D2036695
Address 401 Vanity Fair Lane, Butler, AL, 36904
City Butler
State AL
Zip Code36904
Phone(205) 459-9100

Citation History (4 surveys)

Survey - April 29, 2026

Survey Type: null

Survey Event ID: 26ZP11

Deficiency Tags: D6120 D6128

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D6120 TECHNICAL SUPERVISOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1451(b)(7)(8) (b)(7) Identifying training needs and assuring that each individual performing tests receives regular in-service training and education appropriate for the type and complexity of the laboratory services performed; (b)(8) Evaluating the competency of all testing personnel and assuring that the staff maintain their competency to perform test procedures and report test results promptly, accurately and proficiently. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of the personnel records and an interview with General Supervisor /Testing Personnel 14 (GS/TP14), the Technical Supervisor (TS) failed to ensure competency assessments for Testing Personnel (TP) listed on the CMS 209 (Laboratory Personnel Report) performing moderate and high complexity testing included the six minimal CLIA regulatory requirements. The surveyor noted 14 of the 14 TP semi-annual and annual competency assessments were missing the six requirements. The findings include: 1. A review of the 2024-2026 TP records revealed TP competency assessments in the moderate and high complexity testing had no documentation of the six minimal CLIA regulatory requirements which are as follows: (1) Direct observations of routine patient test performance, including patient preparation, if applicable, specimen handling, processing, and testing. (2) Monitoring the recording and reporting of test results. (3) Review of intermediate test results of worksheets, quality control records, proficiency testing results, and preventive maintenance results. (4) Direct observation of performance of instrument maintenance and function checks. (5) Assessment of test performance through testing previously analyzed specimens, internal blind testing samples or external proficiency testing samples. (6) Assessment of problem-solving skills. 2. GS/TP14 confirmed the above findings during the exit conference on 04-29-2026 at 1:29 PM. D6128 TECHNICAL SUPERVISOR RESPONSIBILITIES Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- CFR(s): 493.1451(b)(9) (b)(9) Thereafter, evaluations must be performed at least annually unless test methodology or instrumentation changes, in which case, prior to reporting patient test results, the individuals performance must be reevaluated to include the use of the new test methodology or instrumentation. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of Testing Personnel (TP) competency records and an interview with the General Supervisor/Testing Personnel 14 (GS/TP14), the Technical Supervisor (TS) failed to assess and document the annual competency for 1 of the 14 TP listed on the CMS 209 (Laboratory Personnel Report) in 2024 and 2025. The findings include: 1. A review of the 2024-2025 competency records revealed GS /TP14 had no documentation of annual competency for the moderate and high complexity testing performed in the laboratory. The surveyor noted the Laboratory Director had documentation of her General Supervisor's personnel evaluation in 2025 and 2026. 2. The GS/TP14 confirmed the above findings during the exit conference on 04-29-2026 at 1:29 PM. -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - November 19, 2024

Survey Type: Special

Survey Event ID: Y1QJ11

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D2016 D2181 D6000 D6016

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 The following deficiencies are a result of a desk review of proficiency testing scores obtained from the national database and verified with the laboratory's proficiency testing provider, College of American Pathologists (CAP). The laboratory was found to be out of compliance with CONDITION LEVEL DEFICIENCIES, as follows: D2016 - 42 C.F.R. 493.803 Condition: Successful participation [proficiency testing] D6000 - 42 C.F.R. 493.1403 Condition: Laboratories performing moderate complexity testing; laboratory director . D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on proficiency testing (PT) desk reviews of the CASPER Reports 0153D and Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- 0155D (Individual Laboratory Profiles from the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS]), and PT evaluation reports from the College of American Pathologists (CAP), the laboratory failed to successfully participate (achieve scores of 100%) in proficiency testing for Compatibility Testing, an analyte in the specialty of Immunohematology. The laboratory failed two out of three PT events in 2024, resulting in initial unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. Refer to D2181. . D2181 COMPATIBILITY TESTING CFR(s): 493.863(e) Failure to achieve an overall testing event score of satisfactory for two consecutive testing events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on proficiency testing (PT) desk reviews of the CASPER Reports 0153D and 0155D (Individual Laboratory Profiles from the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS]), and PT evaluation reports from the College of American Pathologists (CAP), the laboratory failed to successfully participate (achieve scores of 100%) in proficiency testing for Compatibility Testing. The laboratory failed two out of three PT events in 2024, resulting in initial unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. The findings include: 1. A review of the CASPER Reports revealed the laboratory received failing scores for Compatibility Testing in two out of three CAP PT events, as follows: A) 2024 Immunology / Immunohematology Event #1: 80% B) 2024 Immunology / Immunohematology Event #3: 66% 2. A review of the laboratory's proficiency testing evaluation reports in an email from CAP on 11/19 /2024 at 9:03 AM confirmed these findings. . D6000 MODERATE COMPLEXITY LABORATORY DIRECTOR CFR(s): 493.1403 The laboratory must have a director who meets the qualification requirements of 493. 1405 of this subpart and provides overall management and direction in accordance with 493.1407 of this subpart. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on proficiency testing (PT) desk reviews of the CASPER Reports 0153D and 0155D (Individual Laboratory Profiles from the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS]), and proficiency testing evaluation reports from the College of American Pathologists (CAP), the laboratory director failed to ensure successful participation in an HHS approved proficiency testing program. Refer to D6016. . D6016 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1407(e)(4)(i) The laboratory director is responsible for the overall operation and administration of the laboratory, including the employment of personnel who are competent to perform test procedures, and record and report test results promptly, accurate, and proficiently and for assuring compliance with the applicable regulations. (e) The laboratory director must-- (e)(4)(i) Ensure that the proficiency testing samples are tested as required under Subpart H of this part; -- 2 of 3 -- This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on proficiency testing (PT) desk reviews of the CASPER Reports 0153D and 0155D (Individual Laboratory Profiles from the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS]), and PT evaluation reports from the College of American Pathologists (CAP), the laboratory director failed to ensure the laboratory had successful participation in an HHS approved proficiency testing program for Compatibility Testing in two out of three 2024 CAP PT events. Refer to D2181. SURVEYOR ID #32558 Licensure and Certification Surveyor -- 3 of 3 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - September 28, 2022

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: TWY311

Deficiency Tags: D0000

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 The surveyor determined this laboratory is in substantial compliance with the requirements of the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA '88). Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 1 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - February 15, 2018

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: T54Z11

Deficiency Tags: D5439

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5439 CALIBRATION AND CALIBRATION VERIFICATION CFR(s): 493.1255(b) Unless otherwise specified in this subpart, for each applicable test system the laboratory must do the following: Perform and document calibration verification procedure - (b)(1) Following the manufacturer's calibration verification instructions; (b)(2) Using the criteria verified or established by the laboratory under 493.1253(b)(3) -- (b)(2)(i) Including the number, type, and concentration of the materials, as well as acceptable limits for calibration verification; and (b)(2)(ii) Including at least a minimal (or zero) value, a mid-point value, and a maximum value near the upper limit of the range to verify the laboratory's reportable range of test results for the test system; and (b)(3) At least once every 6 months and whenever any of the following occur: (b)(3)(i) A complete change of reagents for a procedure is introduced, unless the laboratory can demonstrate that changing reagent lot numbers does not affect the range used to report patient test results, and control values are not adversely affected by reagent lot number changes. (b)(3)(ii) There is major preventive maintenance or replacement of critical parts that may influence test performance. (b)(3)(iii) Control materials reflect an unusual trend or shift, or are outside of the laboratory's acceptable limits, and other means of assessing and correcting unacceptable control values fail to identify and correct the problem. (b)(3)(iv) The laboratory's established schedule for verifying the reportable range for patient test results requires more frequent calibration verification. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of the Vitros 350 Chemistry analyzer calibration verification records and an interview with the laboratory manager, the laboratory failed to perform a calibration verification for Sodium (Na), Potassium (K), and Chloride (Cl) every six months in 2017. This affected one of three calibration verification performed. The findings include: 1. A review of the calibration records revealed a missing calibration verification for Na, K, and Cl in 2017: a calibration verification was performed on 3 Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- /10/2016, 9/28/2016 and not again until 9/18/2017,exceeding the every six month timeframe. The analytes listed only have two routine calibrators. 2. Whenever any analyte is calibrated with less than three calibration points, a calibration verification is required every six months. 3. During an interview on 2/15/2018 at 2:35 PM, the laboratory manager was asked if she had records for the calibration verification. The laboratory manager stated she did perform the calibration verification but could not find the records during the survey. Jeremy Westry, BS, MT (ASCP) Licensure and Certification Surveyor -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access