Oncology & Radiation Associates Pa

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

5
Total Citations
18
Total Deficiencyies
11
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 10D0880678
Address 3659 S Miami Ave Ste 2001, Miami, FL, 33133-4524
City Miami
State FL
Zip Code33133-4524
Phone305 854-8080
Lab DirectorMICHELE ASTARITA

Citation History (5 surveys)

Survey - October 30, 2024

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: DVZT11

Deficiency Tags: D0000

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A recertification survey was conducted on October 30, 2024. Oncology & Radiation Associates PA clinical laboratory was in compliance with 42 CFR 493, requirements for clinical laboratories. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 1 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - November 17, 2020

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: O0XO11

Deficiency Tags: D5413 D0000 D5439

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A recertification survey conducted on 11/17/2020 found that the Oncology & Radiation Associates PA clinical laboratory was not in compliance with 42 CFR Part 493, Requirements for Laboratories. D5413 TEST SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, REAGENT CFR(s): 493.1252(b) The laboratory must define criteria for those conditions that are essential for proper storage of reagents and specimens, accurate and reliable test system operation, and test result reporting. The criteria must be consistent with the manufacturer's instructions, if provided. These conditions must be monitored and documented and, if applicable, include the following: (1) Water quality. (2) Temperature. (3) Humidity. (4) Protection of equipment and instruments from fluctuations and interruptions in electrical current that adversely affect patient test results and test reports. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the laboratory failed to document room humidity and temperature requirement to ensure optimal operation for the Coulter Ac-T Diff 2 Analyzer for 2 out of 2 years reviewed. The findings include: An observation of laboratory during the tour on 11/17/2020 at 10:30 am, indicated that no thermometer and humid meter was located by the analyzer. A review of Coulter AcT diff2 Hematology Analyzer manual revealed a requirement for optimal operation a range of room temperature of 16 to 35 C and Humidity between 20 to 85 %. A review of temperature logs for 2019 and 2020, revealed no documentation of room humidity and temperature. During an interview on 11/17/202 at 3:30 pm Testing personnel A, confirmed that there was no documentation of the room temperature and humidity for the period of reference. D5439 CALIBRATION AND CALIBRATION VERIFICATION CFR(s): 493.1255(b) Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- Unless otherwise specified in this subpart, for each applicable test system the laboratory must do the following: Perform and document calibration verification procedure - (b)(1) Following the manufacturer's calibration verification instructions; (b)(2) Using the criteria verified or established by the laboratory under 493.1253(b)(3) -- (b)(2)(i) Including the number, type, and concentration of the materials, as well as acceptable limits for calibration verification; and (b)(2)(ii) Including at least a minimal (or zero) value, a mid-point value, and a maximum value near the upper limit of the range to verify the laboratory's reportable range of test results for the test system; and (b)(3) At least once every 6 months and whenever any of the following occur: (b)(3)(i) A complete change of reagents for a procedure is introduced, unless the laboratory can demonstrate that changing reagent lot numbers does not affect the range used to report patient test results, and control values are not adversely affected by reagent lot number changes. (b)(3)(ii) There is major preventive maintenance or replacement of critical parts that may influence test performance. (b)(3)(iii) Control materials reflect an unusual trend or shift, or are outside of the laboratory's acceptable limits, and other means of assessing and correcting unacceptable control values fail to identify and correct the problem. (b)(3)(iv) The laboratory's established schedule for verifying the reportable range for patient test results requires more frequent calibration verification. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and staff interview, the laboratory failed to document calibration verification procedures of the Beckman Coulter AC T diff Analyzer at least every 6 months from 12/14/2018 to 9/25/2019. Findings include: -Review of the Beckman Coulter AC T diff Analyzer calibration records revealed that the laboratory performed calibrations on 12/4/2018, 9/25/2019, 2/12/2020, 5/12/2020. During an interview on 11/17/2020 at 2:00 p.m., the testing person A confirmed that there was no documentation to indicate the instrument calibration every 6 months in the period of 12/04/2018 to 9/25/2019. -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - September 14, 2020

Survey Type: Special

Survey Event ID: B98D11

Deficiency Tags: D2016 D6000 D0000 D2130 D6016

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A desk review survey of the laboratory's proficiency test results was performed on September 14, 2020 for Oncology & Radiation Associates. Oncology & Radiation Associates is not in compliance with Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 493, Laboratory Requirements D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the laboratory's proficiency testing records for 2019 and 2020, the laboratory had subsequent unsuccessful performance in proficiency testing for the specialty of hematology. Refer to D 2130. Findings include: Review of the American Proficiency Institute (API) proficiency testing records and the review of the Centers Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) 153 and 155 reports, on September 14, 2020 on or about 1:00 PM, showed that the laboratory had unsatisfactory testing scores for the analyte, white blood cell differential for three out of four testing events in 2019 and 2020. D2130 HEMATOLOGY CFR(s): 493.851(f) Failure to achieve satisfactory performance for the same analyte in two consecutive events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on the review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) 153 and 155 reports and the laboratory's proficiency testing records, the laboratory had subsequent unsuccessful participation in proficiency testing for the specialty of hematology.. Findings include: On September 14, 2020 on or about 1:00 PM the American Proficiency Institute (API) proficiency testing records and the CMS 153 and 155 reports were reviewed. The review showed that the laboratory had unsuccessful proficiency testing scores for three out of four testing events for the analyte, white blood cell differential (WBC diff), as shown below. Event #1, 2019 WBC differential-33% Event #2, 2019 WBC differential-53% Event #1, 2020 WBC differential-60% D6000 MODERATE COMPLEXITY LABORATORY DIRECTOR CFR(s): 493.1403 The laboratory must have a director who meets the qualification requirements of 493. 1405 of this subpart and provides overall management and direction in accordance with 493.1407 of this subpart. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on the review of the laboratory's proficiency testing records, the laboratory director failed to ensure that the laboratory maintained a satisfactory score for proficiency testing in the specialty of hematology. Findings include: On September 14, 2020, on or about 1:00 PM, the American Proficiency Institute (API) proficiency records and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service (CMS) 153 and 155 reports were reviewed. The review showed that the laboratory had subsequent unsatisfactory proficiency testing score for the analyte, white blood cell differential (WBC diff), in the specialty of hematology. The laboratory director is responsible for ensuring that the laboratory maintains successful participation in proficiency testing. Refer to D 2130. D6016 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1407(e)(4)(i) The laboratory director is responsible for the overall operation and administration of the laboratory, including the employment of personnel who are competent to perform test procedures, and record and report test results promptly, accurate, and proficiently and for assuring compliance with the applicable regulations. (e) The laboratory director must-- (e)(4)(i) Ensure that the proficiency testing samples are tested as required under Subpart H of this part; -- 2 of 3 -- This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on the review of the laboratory's proficiency testing scores, the laboratory director failed to ensure that the laboratory performed proficiency testing in such a manner as to achieve and maintain successful participation in proficiency testing in the specialty of hematology. Findings Include: The review of the American Proficiency Institute (API) proficiency testing records and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) 153 and 155 reports on September 14, 2020 on or about 1: 00 PM showed that the laboratory received unsatisfactory proficiency testing scores for three out of four testing events as shown below. Event #1, 2019 WBC differential- 33% Event #2, 2019 WBC differential-53% Event #1, 2020 WBC differential-60% -- 3 of 3 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - September 16, 2019

Survey Type: Special

Survey Event ID: MMKU11

Deficiency Tags: D2016 D6000 D2130 D6016

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the laboratory's proficiency testing records for 2019, the laboratory did not have successful performance in proficiency testing for the specialty of hematology. Refer to D2130. Findings include: Review of the American Proficiency Institute (API) proficiency testing records and the review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) 153 and 155 reports, on September 16, 2019 on or about 10:00 AM, showed that the laboratory had unsatisfactory testing scores for the analyte, white blood cell differential for two consecutive testing events in 2019. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- D2130 HEMATOLOGY CFR(s): 493.851(f) Failure to achieve satisfactory performance for the same analyte in two consecutive events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on the review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) 153 and 155 reports and the laboratory's proficiency testing records, the laboratory did not have successful performance in proficiency testing in the specialty of hematology. Findings include: On September 16, 2019 on or about 10:00 AM the American Proficiency Institute (API) proficiency testing records and the CMS 153 and 155 reports were reviewed. The review showed that the laboratory failed to achieve satisfactory performance for the analyte, white blood cell differential, as shown below. Event #1, 2019 White blood cell differential-33% Event #2, 2019 white blood cell differential-53% D6000 MODERATE COMPLEXITY LABORATORY DIRECTOR CFR(s): 493.1403 The laboratory must have a director who meets the qualification requirements of 493. 1405 of this subpart and provides overall management and direction in accordance with 493.1407 of this subpart. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on the review of the laboratory's proficiency testing records, the laboratory director failed to ensure that the laboratory maintained a satisfactory score for proficiency testing in the specialty of hematology. Findings include: On September 16, 2019, on or about 10:00 AM, the American Proficiency Institute (API) proficiency records and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service (CMS) 153 and 155 reports were reviewed. The review showed that the laboratory had unsatisfactory testing scores for two consecutive testing events for the analyte, white blood cell differential, in the specialty of hematology. The laboratory director is responsible for ensuring that the laboratory maintains successful participation in proficiency testing. Refer to D2130. D6016 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1407(e)(4)(i) The laboratory director is responsible for the overall operation and administration of the laboratory, including the employment of personnel who are competent to perform test procedures, and record and report test results promptly, accurate, and proficiently and for assuring compliance with the applicable regulations. (e) The laboratory director must-- (e)(4)(i) Ensure that the proficiency testing samples are tested as required under Subpart H of this part; This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on the review of the laboratory's proficiency testing scores, the laboratory director failed to ensure that the laboratory performed proficiency testing in such a manner as to achieve and maintain successful participation in proficiency testing for -- 2 of 3 -- the analyte, white blood cell differential in the specialty of hematology. Findings Include: The review of the American Proficiency Institute (API) proficiency testing records and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) 153 and 155 reports on September 16, 2019 on or about 10:00 AM showed that the laboratory received unsatisfactory proficiency testing scores as shown below. Event #1, 2019 White blood cell differential-33% Event #2, 2019 White blood cell differential-53% -- 3 of 3 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - November 20, 2018

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: S89A11

Deficiency Tags: D5293 D6015 D2001 D6000 D6021

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D2001 ENROLLMENT CFR(s): 493.801(a)(1)(2)(i) The laboratory must-- (1) Notify HHS of the approved program or programs in which it chooses to participate to meet proficiency testing requirements of this subpart. (2)(i) Designate the program(s) to be used for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test to determine compliance with this subpart if the laboratory participates in more than one proficiency testing program approved by CMS; This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of Casper report 96 Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) Application and Survey Summary, review of proficiency testing (PT) records, and interview with testing person (TP) A, the laboratory failed to enroll in a PT program approved by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for hematology specialty during 2017 and the first event of 2018. Findings include: Review of Casper report 96 pulled on 11/16/18 revealed blanks for the 3 events of 2017 and for the first event of 2018. Review of American Association of Bioanalysts (AAB) PT records revealed that there were no records for 2017. Review of the AAB invoice showed that the last payment was on 11/25/15 for enrollment in 2016. Review of American Proficiency Institute (API) records for 2018 revealed no results for the 1st event. Review of the API invoice showed a date of 06/22/18. During an interview on 11/20/18 at 11:30 a.m. TP A confirmed that the facility failed to enroll in PT for 2017 and the first event of 2018. D5293 GENERAL LABORATORY SYSTEMS QUALITY ASSESSMENT CFR(s): 493.1239(b)(c) (b) The general laboratory systems quality assessment must include a review of the effectiveness of

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access