Payne And Rice Clinic, Inc

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

2
Total Citations
11
Total Deficiencyies
5
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 37D0475146
Address 116 Sw 2nd, Checotah, OK, 74426
City Checotah
State OK
Zip Code74426
Phone(918) 473-2278

Citation History (2 surveys)

Survey - April 20, 2021

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: QFHI11

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D2015 D5413 D2015 D5413 D6029 D6029

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 The recertification survey was performed on 04/20/2021. The findings were reviewed with testing person #1 and testing person #2 at the conclusion of the survey. The laboratory was found in compliance with standard-level deficiencies cited. D2015 TESTING OF PROFICIENCY TESTING SAMPLES CFR(s): 493.801(b)(5)(6) (5) The laboratory must document the handling, preparation, processing, examination, and each step in the testing and reporting of results for all proficiency testing samples. The laboratory must maintain a copy of all records, including a copy of the proficiency testing program report forms used by the laboratory to record proficiency testing results including the attestation statement provided by the PT program, signed by the analyst and the laboratory director, documenting that proficiency testing samples were tested in the same manner as patient specimens, for a minimum of two years from the date of the proficiency testing event. (6) PT is required for only the test system, assay, or examination used as the primary method for patient testing during the PT event. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of records and interview with testing person, the laboratory failed to ensure attestation statements were signed by the laboratory director or designee for 5 of 6 events. Findings include: (1) On 04/20/2021, the surveyor reviewed 2019, 2020, and 2021 proficiency testing records, with the following identified: (a) Third Hematology Event (FH2-C) 2019 - The attestation statement had not been signed by the laboratory director or designee; (b) First Hematology Event (FH2-A) 2020 - The attestation statement had not been signed by the laboratory director or designee; (c) Second Hematology Event (FH2-B) 2020 - The attestation statement had not been signed by the laboratory director or designee; (d) Third Hematology Event (FH2-C) 2020 - The attestation statement had not been signed by the laboratory director or designee; (e) First Hematology Event (FH2-A) 2021 - The attestation statement had Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- not been signed by the laboratory director or designee. (2) The surveyor reviewed the records with testing person #1. On 04/20/2021 at 02:26 pm, the attestation statements had not been signed by the laboratory director as indicated above. D5413 TEST SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, REAGENT CFR(s): 493.1252(b) The laboratory must define criteria for those conditions that are essential for proper storage of reagents and specimens, accurate and reliable test system operation, and test result reporting. The criteria must be consistent with the manufacturer's instructions, if provided. These conditions must be monitored and documented and, if applicable, include the following: (1) Water quality. (2) Temperature. (3) Humidity. (4) Protection of equipment and instruments from fluctuations and interruptions in electrical current that adversely affect patient test results and test reports. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of records, manufacturer's instructions, and interview with testing person #1, the laboratory failed to ensure materials were stored as required by the manufacturer. Findings include: (1) On 04/20/2021 at 01:25 pm, testing person #1 stated the following to the surveyor: (a) Blood collection tubes, stored in the laboratory draw room, were used for the following: (i) Routine CBC (Complete Blood Count) testing performed on the Beckman Coulter analyzer. (2) The surveyor reviewed the manufacturer's environmental requirements for the blood collection tubes, which required a room temperature 4-25 degrees C (Celsius). The following were examples of blood collection tubes stored in the rooms: (i) BD Vacutainer K2 EDTA (50 tubes of lot# 0316343). (3) The surveyor reviewed laboratory temperature records from January 2021 through March 2021. There was no evidence that the temperature, where the blood collection tubes were stored, had been monitored at an acceptable range of 4-25 degrees C to accommodate the blood collection tubes; (4) The surveyor asked testing person #1 if the room temperature, where the blood collection tubes were stored, was being monitored. Testing person #1 stated on 04/20 /2021 at 01:49 pm the room temperature was not being monitored. D6029 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1407(e)(11) The laboratory director is responsible for the overall operation and administration of the laboratory, including the employment of personnel who are competent to perform test procedures, and record and report test results promptly, accurate, and proficiently and for assuring compliance with the applicable regulations. (e) The laboratory director must-- (e)(11) Ensure that prior to testing patients' specimens, all personnel have the appropriate education and experience, receive the appropriate training for the type and complexity of the services offered, and have demonstrated that they can perform all testing operations reliably to provide and report accurate results. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of records and interview with testing person #1, the laboratory director failed to ensure that a person performing moderate complexity testing had the appropriate training. Findings include: (1) On 04/20/2021, the surveyor reviewed personnel records. The following was identified: (a) Testing Person #2 - This person was hired to perform patient testing on 11/02/2020. There was no documentation this -- 2 of 3 -- person had been initially trained; (2) The surveyor reviewed the findings with testing person #1. On 04/20/2021 at 02:15 pm testing person #1 stated there was no additional documentation to prove the above person had been initially trained to perform moderate complexity testing. -- 3 of 3 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - April 10, 2019

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: NWU711

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D1001 D0000 D1001

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 The recertification survey was performed on 04/10/19. The laboratory was found to be in compliance with a standard-level deficiency cited. The findings were reviewed with the laboratory manager and testing person #1 at the conclusion of the survey. D1001 CERTIFICATE OF WAIVER TESTS CFR(s): 493.15(e) Laboratories eligible for a certificate of waiver must-- (1) Follow manufacturers' instructions for performing the test; and (2) Meet the requirements in subpart B, Certificate of Waiver, of this part. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of the manufacturer's instructions, observation, and interview with testing person #1 and testing person #2, the laboratory failed to follow the manufacturer's instructions for waived testing. Findings include: (1) At the beginning of the survey, testing person #1 stated to the surveyor the laboratory performed urinalysis using the Multistix 10SG reagent dipsticks and the Clinitek 50 dipstick reader; (2) The surveyor observed the laboratory and identified the canister of the urine reagent dipsticks in use on the day of the survey (Lot #810024). There was no open date documented on the canister; (3) The surveyor asked reviewed the manufacturer's instructions for the reagent dipsticks, which stated the following: (a) "Record the opening date on the label."; (b) "Test positive and negative quality controls with new lots, new shipments of reagents, and when you open a new bottle of reagent strips. Test reagents monthly that are stored for more than 30 days." (4) The surveyor then asked testing person #1 to explain the laboratory's quality control procedure for the urine reagent dipsticks. Testing person #1 explained positive and negative urine controls were tested when a new canister of reagent dipsticks was opened, and before a new lot number was put into use; (5) The surveyor reviewed the manufacturer's instructions with testing person #1 and explained because the laboratory did not follow the manufacturer's instructions to document the open date on Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- the canister, it could not be verified that quality control had been performed each 30 days of storage as the manufacturer required; (6) Testing person #1 stated to the surveyor, the laboratory failed to follow the manufacturer's instructions to record the open date on the label of the canister of reagent dipsticks to ensure the manufacturer's quality control requirement had been met. -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access