Pediatric First, Pc

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

3
Total Citations
10
Total Deficiencyies
8
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 11D0726627
Address 1049 N Houston Rd, Warner Robins, GA, 31093
City Warner Robins
State GA
Zip Code31093
Phone(478) 922-9001

Citation History (3 surveys)

Survey - December 3, 2020

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: D9IX11

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D5413

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) Recertification survey was completed on December 3, 2020. The laboratory was not in compliance with applicable CLIA requirements found at 42 CFR 493.1 through 42 CFR 493.1780. The following deficiencies were cited: D5413 TEST SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, REAGENT CFR(s): 493.1252(b) The laboratory must define criteria for those conditions that are essential for proper storage of reagents and specimens, accurate and reliable test system operation, and test result reporting. The criteria must be consistent with the manufacturer's instructions, if provided. These conditions must be monitored and documented and, if applicable, include the following: (1) Water quality. (2) Temperature. (3) Humidity. (4) Protection of equipment and instruments from fluctuations and interruptions in electrical current that adversely affect patient test results and test reports. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on the review of the Temperature Charts/Department of Public Health (DPH) Refrigerator and Freezer charts, and staff interview the laboratory failed to document the room temp and humidity as required by the manufacturer for the Cell-Dyn Emerald, hematology analyzer. Findings: 1. Based on the Operator Manual for the Abbott Cell Dyn Emerald, the manufacturer states that the relative humidity should be 80% Maximum, and room temperature up to 90 degrees F, or 32 degrees C. The laboratory did not have a log to document the room temperature and humidity. 2. Based on review of the DPH temp charts, the laboratory documented the room temp from January 2019 to March 2019 across the top of the DPH temp chart, after March 2019 there was no more room temps documented for 2019, and no Humidity documented for 2019. In 2020, there was no room temps or humidity documented. 3. Interview with the office manager, in the back Doctor's office on December 3, 2020, at approximately 1 pm, confirmed that the laboratory did not have a log for Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- documenting the room temperature and Humidity in the laboratory, and that after March 2019 there was no room temps and humidly documented for the rest of 2019 and all of 2020. -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - March 27, 2019

Survey Type: Special

Survey Event ID: FSEO11

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D2016 D2127 D2130 D6000 D6016

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A proficiency testing desk review was completed on March 27, 2019. At the time of the review, the laboratory was not in compliance with the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988, 42 CFR 493.1 through 42 CFR 493.1780. The following deficiencies were cited: D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on proficiency testing desk review using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Casper Reports 155 and 153 and review of the laboratory's College of American Pathology (CAP) proficiency testing (PT) reports, the laboratory failed to maintain satisfactory performance in two consecutive events (3rd event of 2018 and Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- 1st event of 2019), resulting in the first unsuccessful occurrence for platelets (PLT) # 815. Findings include: Refer to D 2127 & D 2130 D2127 HEMATOLOGY CFR(s): 493.851(d) Failure to return proficiency testing results to the proficiency testing program within the time frame specified by the program is unsatisfactory performance and results in a score of 0 for the testing event. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on proficiency testing desk review using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Casper Reports 155 and 153 and review of the laboratory's College of American Pathology (CAP) proficiency testing (PT) reports, the laboratory failed to submit results to CAP within the time frame specified by the program. Findings include: 1. Desk review of Casper Reports 153 and 155 disclosed the laboratory failed analyte #815 platelets on event 3 of 2018 with a score of 0%. 2. Desk review of the laboratory's proficiency testing reports from CAP confirmed the laboratory failed platelets on event of 3 of 2018 with a score of 0% and revealed the 0% score was because CAP received results from the lab after the due date. D2130 HEMATOLOGY CFR(s): 493.851(f) Failure to achieve satisfactory performance for the same analyte in two consecutive events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on proficiency testing desk review using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Casper Reports 155 and 153 and review of the laboratory's College of American Pathology (CAP) proficiency testing (PT) reports, the laboratory failed to maintain satisfactory performance in two consecutive events (3rd event of 2018 and 1st event of 2019), resulting in the first unsuccessful occurrence for platelets (PLT) # 815. Findings include: 1. Desk review of Casper Reports 153 and 155 disclosed the laboratory failed analyte #815 platelets on event 3 of 2018 with a score of 0% and event 1 of 2019 with a score of 60%. 2. Desk review of the laboratory's proficiency testing reports from CAP confirmed the laboratory failed platelets on event 3 of 2018 and event 1 of 2019 resulting in the first unsuccessful performance. Based on proficiency testing desk review using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Casper Reports 155 and 153 and review of the laboratory's College of American Pathology (CAP) proficiency testing (PT) reports, the laboratory failed to maintain satisfactory performance in two consecutive events (3rd event of 2018 and 1st event of 2019), resulting in the first unsuccessful occurrence for platelets (PLT) # 815. Findings include: D6000 MODERATE COMPLEXITY LABORATORY DIRECTOR CFR(s): 493.1403 The laboratory must have a director who meets the qualification requirements of 493. 1405 of this subpart and provides overall management and direction in accordance with 493.1407 of this subpart. -- 2 of 3 -- This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on proficiency testing desk review using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Casper Reports 155 and 153 and review of the laboratory's College of American Pathology (CAP) proficiency testing (PT) reports, the laboratory director failed to ensure the laboratory maintained satisfactory performance in two consecutive events (3rd event of 2018 and 1st event of 2019) and failed to ensure the the laboratory submitted results to CAP within the time frame specified by the program., resulting in the first unsuccessful occurrence for platelets (PLT) # 815. Findings include: Refer to D 6016 D6016 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1407(e)(4)(i) The laboratory director is responsible for the overall operation and administration of the laboratory, including the employment of personnel who are competent to perform test procedures, and record and report test results promptly, accurate, and proficiently and for assuring compliance with the applicable regulations. (e) The laboratory director must-- (e)(4)(i) Ensure that the proficiency testing samples are tested as required under Subpart H of this part; This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on proficiency testing desk review using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Casper Reports 155 and 153 and review of the laboratory's College of American Pathology (CAP) proficiency testing (PT) reports, the laboratory director failed to ensure the laboratory maintained satisfactory performance in two consecutive events (3rd event of 2018 and 1st event of 2019) and failed to ensure the laboratory submitted results to CAP within the time frame specified by the program., resulting in the first unsuccessful occurrence for platelets (PLT) # 815. Findings include: 1. Desk review of Casper Reports 153 and 155 revealed the laboratory failed analyte #815 platelets on event 3 of 2018 with a score of 0% and event 1 of 2019 with a score of 60%. 2. Desk review of the laboratory's proficiency testing reports from CAP confirmed the laboratory failed platelets on event 3 of 2018 and event 1 of 2019 resulting in the first unsuccessful performance. 3. Desk review of the laboratory's proficiency testing reports from CAP also revealed the laboratory failed platelets on event of 3 of 2018 with a score of 0% because CAP received results past the due date. -- 3 of 3 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - April 19, 2018

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: 6X2511

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D5439

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) recertification survey was completed on April 19, 2018. The laboratory was not in compliance with all applicable CLIA requirements found at 42 CFR 493.1 through 42 CFR 493.1780. The following deficiencies were cited: D5439 CALIBRATION AND CALIBRATION VERIFICATION CFR(s): 493.1255(b) Unless otherwise specified in this subpart, for each applicable test system the laboratory must do the following: Perform and document calibration verification procedure - (b)(1) Following the manufacturer's calibration verification instructions; (b)(2) Using the criteria verified or established by the laboratory under 493.1253(b)(3) -- (b)(2)(i) Including the number, type, and concentration of the materials, as well as acceptable limits for calibration verification; and (b)(2)(ii) Including at least a minimal (or zero) value, a mid-point value, and a maximum value near the upper limit of the range to verify the laboratory's reportable range of test results for the test system; and (b)(3) At least once every 6 months and whenever any of the following occur: (b)(3)(i) A complete change of reagents for a procedure is introduced, unless the laboratory can demonstrate that changing reagent lot numbers does not affect the range used to report patient test results, and control values are not adversely affected by reagent lot number changes. (b)(3)(ii) There is major preventive maintenance or replacement of critical parts that may influence test performance. (b)(3)(iii) Control materials reflect an unusual trend or shift, or are outside of the laboratory's acceptable limits, and other means of assessing and correcting unacceptable control values fail to identify and correct the problem. (b)(3)(iv) The laboratory's established schedule for verifying the reportable range for patient test results requires more frequent calibration verification. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the calibration records for the Abbott Emerald Hematology Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- Analyzer, and staff interview the laboratory failed to calibrate the Abbott Emerald Hematology Analyzer at least every 6 months. Findings: 1. Review of the 2017 and 2018 calibration records for the Abbott Emerald Hematology Analyzer showed that the calibration was performed in January of 2017, and August of 2017 (7 months), and in March of 2018 (7 months). 2. Interviw with the office manager on April 19, 2018 at 3:40pm in the Lab Director's office confirmed that the Abbott Emerald Hematology Analyzer was calibrated in January of 2017, and August of 2017 (7 months), and in March of 2018 (7 months). -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access