Pinnacle Dermatology Villa Linde

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

3
Total Citations
17
Total Deficiencyies
8
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 23D2090351
Address 2256 W Hill Road, Flint, MI, 48507
City Flint
State MI
Zip Code48507
Phone(810) 249-7546

Citation History (3 surveys)

Survey - July 8, 2025

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: DMLV11

Deficiency Tags: D5417 D6093 D5417 D6093

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5417 TEST SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, REAGENT CFR(s): 493.1252(d) (d) Reagents, solutions, culture media, control materials, calibration materials, and other supplies must not be used when they have exceeded their expiration date, have deteriorated, or are of substandard quality. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: . Based on observation and interview with Mohs Tech (MT), the laboratory failed to ensure reagents were not used beyond the expiration dates for 5 of 8 bottles of reagents. Findings include: 1. During a tour of the laboratory on 07/07/2025 at 9:30 am, the surveyor observed expired reagents: a. 1 bottle of Blue Tissue Marking Dye with an expiration date of 7/31/2023. b. 2 bottles of 10% Formalin Fixative with an expiration date of 09/6/2020. c. 1 bottle of Eosin Working Solution with an expiration date of 03/06/2020. d. 1 bottle of 1% Acid Alcohol with an expiration date of 02/28 /2025. 2. An interview conducted on 07/07/2025 at 11:45 a.m., the MT confirmed expired reagents were available for use. D6093 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1445(e)(5) (e)(5) Ensure that the quality control and quality assessment programs are established and maintained to assure the quality of laboratory services provided and to identify failures in quality as they occur; This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview with Mohs Tech (MT), the laboratory failed to follow established general laboratory systems quality assessment policies and procedures for 3 (March - June 2024, July - September 2024. October - December Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- 2024) of 8 quarters reviewed. Findings include: 1. A record review of the laboratory's quality assessment documentation revealed quality assessments documentation was not present for 3 quarters in 2024 (2nd quarter, 3rd quarter, 4th quarter). 2. A review of the laboratory "Policy on Quality Assurance - Quarterly Checklist" revealed in section titled "QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN," first sentence," Quarterly, the technician will select on Mohs surgical case for a process quality assurance check..., " ..."the approved quality assurance checklist will be filled out for this case.... These forms will be kept.... for two years." 3. An interview conducted on 07/07/2025 at 11: 13 am with the MT confirmed that records were not present. -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - June 27, 2023

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: 9TRL11

Deficiency Tags: D5209

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5209 PERSONNEL COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT POLICIES CFR(s): 493.1235 As specified in the personnel requirements in subpart M, the laboratory must establish and follow written policies and procedures to assess employee and, if applicable, consultant competency. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: . Based on record review and interview with the Mohs Technician, the laboratory failed to establish a policy to assess the competency of personnel serving as clinical consultants, technical supervisors, and general supervisors for 2 (Testing Personnel #1 and 2) of 2 personnel listed on Form CMS-209. Findings include: 1. A review of the laboratory's "Policy for Personnel Competency" revealed a lack of process to assess personnel serving as clinical consultant, technical supervisor or general supervisor. 2. A review of competency assessments revealed a lack of documentation assessing the following personnel serving as clinical consultant, technical supervisor or general supervisor: a. Testing Personnel #1 (also serving as laboratory director, clinical consultant, technical supervisor, and general supervisor) b. Testing Personnel #2 (also serving as clinical consultant) 3. An interview on 6/27/23 at 10:58 am with the Mohs Technician confirmed the laboratory had not established a process to assess competency for personnel serving as clinical consultant, technical supervisor or general supervisor. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 1 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - November 2, 2021

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: NVV911

Deficiency Tags: D5217 D5429 D5429 D5787 D5793 D5793 D5209 D5209 D5217 D5473 D5473 D5787

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5209 PERSONNEL COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT POLICIES CFR(s): 493.1235 As specified in the personnel requirements in subpart M, the laboratory must establish and follow written policies and procedures to assess employee and, if applicable, consultant competency. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: . Based on record review and interview with the Laboratory Liaison (LL), the laboratory failed to assess testing personnel, clinical consultant, technical supervisor, and the general supervisor competency for 2 (Testing Personnel #1 (TP1) and Testing Personnel #2 (TP2)) of 2 personnel listed on the CMS 209 form. Findings include: 1. A review of the laboratory's competency records revealed a lack of competency records in 2021 for the following employees: a. TP1, also functioning as Clinical Consultant #1, Technical Supervisor, and the General Supervisor b. TP2, also functioning as Clinical Consultant #2 2. An interview on 11/02/2021 at 11:06 am, the LL confirmed competency assessments were not performed on the two laboratory employees listed above. D5217 EVALUATION OF PROFICIENCY TESTING PERFORMANCE CFR(s): 493.1236(c)(1) At least twice annually, the laboratory must verify the accuracy of any test or procedure it performs that is not included in subpart I of this part. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: . Based on record review and interview with the Laboratory Liaison (LL), the laboratory failed to verify the accuracy of the tissue specimen grossing and microscopic tissue examinations as part of Mohs surgery for 1 (2020) of 2 years Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- reviewed. Findings include: 1. A review of the laboratory's "Mohs' Policy and Procedure Manual" revealed in section XII "Mohs Proficiency Testing" that "2 cases /calendar year or on a semi-annual basis" will be reviewed by another Mohs' Surgeon, dermatopathologist or dermatologist. 2. On 11/02/2021 at 11:21 am, the surveyor requested the laboratory's verification of accuracy documentation and it was not made available. 3. An interview on 11/02/2021 at 1:50 pm, the LL confirmed the laboratory did not have verification of accuracy documentation available for 2020. D5429 MAINTENANCE AND FUNCTION CHECKS CFR(s): 493.1254(a)(1) For unmodified manufacturer's equipment, instruments, or test systems, the laboratory must perform and document maintenance as defined by the manufacturer and with at least the frequency specified by the manufacturer. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: . Based on observation and interview with the Laboratory Liaison (LL), the laboratory failed to perform and document thermometer calibrations for 1 (Serial number (S/N) 192293497) of 1 thermometers before the expiration date. Findings include: 1. During a tour of the laboratory on 11/02/2021 at 9:35 am, the surveyor observed the ThermoScientific traceable thermometer in use that measured the room temperature and humidity with an expiration date of 7/01/2021. 2. An interview on 11/02/2021 at 1:50 pm, the LL confirmed the laboratory failed to perform and document thermometer calibration for the expired thermometer or replace it. D5473 CONTROL PROCEDURES CFR(s): 493.1256(e)(2)(g) (e) For reagent, media, and supply checks, the laboratory must do the following: (e) (2) Each day of use (unless otherwise specified in this subpart), test staining materials for intended reactivity to ensure predictable staining characteristics. Control materials for both positive and negative reactivity must be included, as appropriate. (g) The laboratory must document all control procedures performed. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: . Based on record review and interview with the Laboratory Liaison (LL), the laboratory failed to ensure the Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stain was performed and documented each day of patient testing for 3 days (December 11, 2020, August 30, and September 7 in 2021) of 2 years reviewed. Findings include: 1. A review of the laboratory's "Laboratory Control Staining" log for the H&E stain quality revealed the following days a lacked documentation as follows: a. December 11, 2020 - 14 cases performed (FVA20-0098 to FVA20-0111) b. August 30, 2021 - six cases performed (FVS21-0014 to FVS21-0019) c. September 7, 2021 - seven cases performed (FVS21-0020 to FVS21-0026) 2. A review of the laboratory's "Mohs Policy and Procedure Manual" revealed in section IV "Mohs Surgery" stated a control slide from the 1st Mohs case of the day will be performed and documented each day of patient testing. 3. An interview on 11/02/2021 at 1:1:50 pm, the LL confirmed there was no documentation of the H&E stain quality on the days listed above. D5787 TEST RECORDS CFR(s): 493.1283(a) -- 2 of 3 -- The laboratory must maintain an information or record system that includes the following: (a)(1) The positive identification of the specimen. (a)(2) The date and time of specimen receipt into the laboratory. (a)(3) The condition and disposition of specimens that do not meet the laboratory's criteria for specimen acceptability. (a)(4) The records and dates of all specimen testing, including the identity of the personnel who performed the test(s). This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: . Based on record review and interview with the Laboratory Liaison (LL), the laboratory failed to record the specimen receipt time into the laboratory for the Mohs' tissue specimens for 13 of 17 final Mohs' maps reviewed. Findings include: 1. A record review for 13 of 17 final Mohs' maps reviewed in the patients electronic medical record (EMR) system revealed the laboratory did not record the specimen receipt time into the laboratory for the tissue specimen on the Mohs' map as follows: a. specimen M20-010 - collected on 1/17/2020 b. specimen M20-046 - collected on 3 /20/2020 c. specimen M20-083 - collected on 5/29/2020 d. specimen M20-0133 - collected on 7/22/2020 e. specimen M20-0176 - collected on 9/16/2020 f. specimen FVA20-0275 - collected on 11/18/2020 g. specimen FVA21-0005 - collected on 1/07 /2021 h. specimen FVA21-0279 - collected on 5/27/2021 i. specimen FVA21-0353 - collected on 7/08/2021 j. specimen FVS21-0001 - collected on 8/17/2021 k. specimen FVS21-0058 - collected on 9/22/2021 l. specimen FVS21-0079 - collected on 10/06 /2021 m. specimen FVS21-0123 - collected on 10/20/2021 2. An interview on 11/02 /2021 at 1:30 pm, the LL confirmed the final Mohs' maps did not contain the time of receipt into the laboratory for the Mohs' tissue specimens. D5793 ANALYTIC SYSTEMS QUALITY ASSESSMENT CFR(s): 493.1289(b)(c) (b) The analytic systems quality assessment must include a review of the effectiveness of

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access