Summary:
Summary Statement of Deficiencies D2000 ENROLLMENT AND TESTING OF SAMPLES CFR(s): 493.801 Each laboratory must enroll in a proficiency testing (PT) program that meets the criteria in subpart I of this part and is approved by HHS. The laboratory must enroll in an approved program or programs for each of the specialties and subspecialties for which it seeks certification. The laboratory must test the samples in the same manner as patients' specimens. For laboratories subject to 42 CFR part 493 published on March 14, 1990 (55 FR 9538) prior to September 1, 1992, the rules of this subpart are effective on September 1, 1992. For all other laboratories, the rules of this subpart are effective January 1, 1994. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview with laboratory staff, the lab was not enrolled in proficiency testing for Rh testing for the first 2 proficiency test events of 2018. Findings: 1. The laboratory was not enrolled in proficiency testing through a proficiency test provider for the first and second events of 2018; 2. The CASPER report 0096D shows that the lab did not receive scores for event 1 and event 2 of 2018. The proficiency test provider was contacted and stated that the laboratory was not enrolled until the third event of 2018; 3. The laboratory obtained remedial proficiency testing that was evaluated by the provider on August 23, 2018, but did not participate in the regular first and second event cycles until the third event. D5209 PERSONNEL COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT POLICIES CFR(s): 493.1235 As specified in the personnel requirements in subpart M, the laboratory must establish and follow written policies and procedures to assess employee and, if applicable, consultant competency. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 4 -- This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of annual competency evaluations and interview with staff, the laboratory did not evaluate the technical consultant for technical consultant duties. Findings: 1. The competency check record used for the technical consultant was the same report used to document competency checks for testing personnel, but did not include additional duties performed as required of a technical consultant; and 2. This was confirmed during interview with lab staff on the day of survey. D5211 EVALUATION OF PROFICIENCY TESTING PERFORMANCE CFR(s): 493.1236(a) The laboratory must review and evaluate the results obtained on proficiency testing performed as specified in subpart H of this part. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the laboratory did not document the review of the proficiency test providers evaluation of the labs performance for the remedial proficiency testing event graded on August 23, 2018. Findings: 1. The laboratory obtained remedial proficiency testing for the Rh test after the lab missed enrollment in the first and second proficiency test events in 2018. The laboratory participated in the remedial event and the proficiency test provider graded the results and provided a performance report to the laboratory; 2. There was no written documentation that the remedial proficiency test results were reviewed by the lab director and staff, in addition there was no written