Planned Parenthood Of Se Pennsylvania

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

3
Total Citations
15
Total Deficiencyies
9
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 39D0668196
Address 1144 Locust Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107
City Philadelphia
State PA
Zip Code19107
Phone(215) 351-5560

Citation History (3 surveys)

Survey - January 21, 2025

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: ED5K11

Deficiency Tags: D2014 D5403 D6033 D6035 D5209 D5209 D5403 D6033 D6035

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D2014 TESTING OF PROFICIENCY TESTING SAMPLES (b)(6) The laboratory must document the handling, preparation, processing, examination, and each step in the testing and reporting of results for all proficiency testing samples. The laboratory must maintain a copy of all records, including a copy of the proficiency testing program report forms used by the laboratory to record proficiency testing results including the attestation statement provided by the PT program, signed by the analyst and the laboratory director, documenting that proficiency testing samples were tested in the same manner as patient specimens, for a minimum of two years from the date of the proficiency testing event. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: A. Based on lack of documentation, review of the laboratory's American Association of Bioanalysts Medical Laboratory Evaluation (AAB-MLE) proficiency testing (PT) records and interview with the Director of Clinical Services (DCS), the laboratory failed to provide 3 of 3 AAB-MLE attestation statements for Provider Performed Microscopy (PPM) PT testing events performed in 2023. Findings include: 1. On the day of survey, 01/21/2025, the laboratory failed to provide attestation statements for the following 3 of 3 AAB-MLE Chemistry PT events for PPM examinations (vaginal wet mount/potassium hydroxide prep) performed in 2023: - Chemistry M1 2023 - Chemistry M2 2023 - Chemistry M3 2023 2. The DCS confirmed the findings above on 01/21/2025 at 12:10 pm. B. Based on review of the laboratory's proficiency testing (PT) policy, American Association of Bioanalysts Medical Laboratory Evaluation (AAB-MLE) PT records and interview with the Director of Clinical Services (DCS), the laboratory director (LD)/designee and testing personnel (TP) failed to attest to the routine integration of samples into the patient workload for 3 of 3 AAB-MLE Chemistry: Provider Performed Microscopy (PPM) PT events performed in 2024. Findings include: 1. The laboratory's proficiency testing policy states, "Assigned staff test samples, record results on the testing sheet and signs attestation. Completed form is given, faxed or scanned and emailed to the laboratory director for signature." 2. On Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 4 -- the day of survey, 01/21/2025 at 9:42 am., review of the laboratory's AAB-MLE PT records revealed the LD/designee and TP failed to sign attestation statement forms for 3 of 3 AAB-MLE Chemistry PT events for PPM examinations (vaginal wet mount /potassium hydroxide prep) performed in 2024: - Chemistry M1 2024 - Chemistry M2 2024 - Chemistry M3 2024 3. The DCS confirmed the findings above on 01/21/2025 at 12:10 pm. D5209 PERSONNEL COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT POLICIES CFR(s): 493.1235 As specified in the personnel requirements in subpart M, the laboratory must establish and follow written policies and procedures to assess employee and, if applicable, consultant competency. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on lack of documentation, review of the laboratory's personnel policy, and interview with the Director of Clinical Services (DCS), the laboratory failed to follow established policies to assess the competency of 1 of 2 Technical Consultants (TC) for their supervisory responsibilities performed in 2023 and 2024. Findings include: 1. The laboratory's personnel policy states, "Technical Consultants must be privileged by the Lab Director and are assessed for competency at the completion of training, at 6 months, and annually." 2. On the day of the survey, 01/21/2025, the laboratory failed to provide competency records for 1 of 2 TC (CMS 209 personnel #3) for their supervisory responsibilities performed in 2023 and 2024. 3. The DCS confirmed the findings above on 01/21/2025 at 12:10 pm. D5403 PROCEDURE MANUAL CFR(s): 493.1251(b) (b) The procedure manual must include the following when applicable to the test procedure: (b)(1) Requirements for patient preparation; specimen collection, labeling, storage, preservation, transportation, processing, and referral; and criteria for specimen acceptability and rejection as described in 493.1242. (b)(2) Microscopic examination, including the detection of inadequately prepared slides. (b)(3) Step-by- step performance of the procedure, including test calculations and interpretation of results. (b)(4) Preparation of slides, solutions, calibrators, controls, reagents, stains, and other materials used in testing. (b)(5) Calibration and calibration verification procedures. (b)(6) The reportable range for test results for the test system as established or verified in 493.1253. (b)(7) Control procedures. (b)(8)

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - January 19, 2023

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: K31011

Deficiency Tags: D6054 D6053 D6054

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D6053 TECHNICAL CONSULTANT RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1413(b)(9) The technical consultant is responsible for evaluating and documenting the performance of individuals responsible for moderate complexity testing at least semiannually during the first year the individual tests patient specimens. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of review of competency assessment records and interview with the Technical Consultant (TC)#3, the technical consultant failed to evaluate and document the semi-annual Competency Assessment (CA) during the first year of employment for 2 of 4 Testing personnel (TP) responsible for performing Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) and Wet Mounts examinations from 10/07/2021 to 01/19/2023 Findings include: 1. On the day of the survey, 01/19/2023 at 11:36am. the laboratory was unable to produce the semi-annual competency assessment records for 2 of 4 TP (CMS209 personnel #13 and #14) who performed KOH and Wet Mounts microscopic examinations. - TP 11 started working in the facility on 10/07/2021 - TP 12 started working in the facility on 04/21/2022 2. The TC confirmed the findings above on 03 /04/2022 at 09:3 a.m. D6054 TECHNICAL CONSULTANT RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1413(b)(9) The technical consultant is responsible for evaluating and documenting the performance of individuals responsible for moderate complexity testing at least annually, after the first year. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of review of competency assessment records and interview with the Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- Technical Consultant (TC)#3, the technical consultant failed to evaluate and document the annual Competency Assessment (CA) for 3 of 4 Testing personnel (TP) responsible for Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) and Wet mounts microscopic examinations and for 1 of 8 TP responsible for performing Rhesus (Rh) factor typing in 2021 and 2022 Findings include: 1. On the day of the survey, 01/19/2023 at 11:36 am. the laboratory was unable to produce the annual competency assessment records for the following: - KOH and Wet Mounts microscopic examinations: - TP 9 and 10 (CMS209 personnel number 11 and 12) in 2021 and 2022. - TP 11 (CMS209 personnel number 13) in 2022. - (Rh) factor typing: - TP 4 (CMS 209 Personnel Number 6) in 2022 2. The TC#3 confirmed the findings above on 01/19/2022 at 01:20 pm. -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - November 16, 2020

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: 4NL811

Deficiency Tags: D6051 D6051 D6021

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D6021 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1407(e)(5) The laboratory director is responsible for the overall operation and administration of the laboratory, including the employment of personnel who are competent to perform test procedures, and record and report test results promptly, accurate, and proficiently and for assuring compliance with the applicable regulations. (e) The laboratory director must-- (e)(5) Ensure that quality assessment programs are established and maintained to assure the quality of laboratory services provided. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the procedure manual and interview with the Testing Personnel #8 (TP#8), the Laboratory Director (LD) failed to ensure a General Laboratory System Quality Assessment (QA) program was established and maintained to ensure the quality of laboratory services provided from 2018 to the day of survey. Findings Include: 1. On the day of survey 11/16/2020, TP#8 could not provide a QA procedure or complete documentation of periodic evaluation of the laboratory that assess its preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical processes from 2018 to 11/16/2020. 2. TP#8 confirmed the finding above on 11/16/2020 at 11:00 a.m. D6051 TECHNICAL CONSULTANT RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1413(b)(8)(v) The procedures for evaluation of the competency of the staff must include, but are not limited to assessment of test performance through testing previously analyzed specimens, internal blind testing samples or external proficiency testing samples. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of American Association of Bioanalysts (AAB) proficiency testing Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- (PT) records and interview with the technical consultant #1 (TC#1), the TC failed to evaluate the test performance of 7 of 8 testing personnel (TP) through internal blind testing samples or external PT samples for Rhesus (Rh) D factor assay examinations in 2019 and 2020. Findings Include: 1. On the day of survey, 11/16/2020, review of AAB PT records revealed, 1 of 8 TP (TP#1) performed the external PT samples for Rh D factor assay examinations for 3 of 3 events in 2019 and 3 of 3 events in 2020. 2. The TC#1 could not provide documentation of internal blind testing evaluations performed for 7 of 8 TP (TP#2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8) for Rh D assay examinations in 2019 and 2020. 3. The TC#1 confirmed the findings above on 11/16/2020 at 11:30 a. m. -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access