Rainelle Medical Center

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

3
Total Citations
16
Total Deficiencyies
7
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 51D0235474
Address 176 Medical Center Drive, Rainelle, WV, 25962
City Rainelle
State WV
Zip Code25962
Phone(304) 438-6188

Citation History (3 surveys)

Survey - September 14, 2022

Survey Type: Special, Standard

Survey Event ID: OCOE11

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D5413 D5481 D5891 D0000 D5413 D5481 D5891

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 An announced, on site, routine recertification survey was conducted at Rainelle Medical Center on September 14, 2022, by the West Virginia Office of Laboratory Services. The laboratory was assessed for compliance with the Federal Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment (CLIA) regulations under 42 CFR 493. Specific deficiencies are explained below. D5413 TEST SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, REAGENT CFR(s): 493.1252(b) The laboratory must define criteria for those conditions that are essential for proper storage of reagents and specimens, accurate and reliable test system operation, and test result reporting. The criteria must be consistent with the manufacturer's instructions, if provided. These conditions must be monitored and documented and, if applicable, include the following: (1) Water quality. (2) Temperature. (3) Humidity. (4) Protection of equipment and instruments from fluctuations and interruptions in electrical current that adversely affect patient test results and test reports. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a tour of the laboratory and interview, the laboratory failed to ensure the environmental room temperature was being monitored and documented from a NIST calibrated thermometer. Findings: 1. A tour of the laboratory, 9/14/22 at approximately 11:00 AM, revealed the environmental room temperature was being monitored and documented from a non-calibrated thermometer (SIN:18F11). 2. An interview with the laboratory manager, 9/14/22 at approximately 11:00 AM, confirmed the thermometer was not NIST calibrated. D5481 CONTROL PROCEDURES CFR(s): 493.1256(f)(g) (f) Results of control materials must meet the laboratory's and, as applicable, the Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- manufacturer's test system criteria for acceptability before reporting patient test results. (g) The laboratory must document all control procedures performed. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of quality control (QC) records, written policies and procedures (P&P), and interview the laboratory failed to ensure the results of QC met the criteria for acceptability before releasing patient test results on 5 of 28 testing days in July 2022. Findings: 1. Review of QC records for July 2022 identified the following analytes out of acceptable range (>2SD) with patient results released: 7/5/22 CO2, 7/7 /22 Sodium, 7/11/22 Sodium, 7/12/22 Creatinine, Chloride, CO2, and Cholesterol, 7 /15/22 Chloride. 2. Review of P&P identified the process to handle out of range QC: "Run 2 levels of control each day of testing. If levels are out of range no testing will be performed until the problem has been resolved". No documentation of the

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - September 18, 2020

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: U4SS11

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D2127 D0000 D2127

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 An announced, on site, recertification survey was conducted at Rainelle Medical Center on September 18, 2020, by the West Virginia Office of Laboratory Services. The laboratory was surveyed to assess compliance with the Federal Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment (CLIA) regulations under 42 CFR 493. Specific deficiencies are explained below. D2127 HEMATOLOGY CFR(s): 493.851(d) Failure to return proficiency testing results to the proficiency testing program within the time frame specified by the program is unsatisfactory performance and results in a score of 0 for the testing event. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of the laboratory American Proficiency Institute (API) proficiency testing (PT) records, CASPER Report 155D, and an interview with the laboratory manager, the laboratory failed to return PT results to API within the specified time frame for the 2020 Hematology/Coagulation 2nd event and received an unsatisfactory performance score of 0. Findings: 1. A review of laboratory 2019 and 2020 API PT records identified unsatisfactory scores of 0 for Cell ID or WBC Diff, RBC, HCT, HGB, WBC, and Platelets for the API 2020 Hematology/Coagulation 2nd testing event. A documented

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - April 26, 2018

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: N06N11

Deficiency Tags: D5437 D5439 D5437 D5439

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5437 CALIBRATION AND CALIBRATION VERIFICATION CFR(s): 493.1255(a) Unless otherwise specified in this subpart, for each applicable test system the laboratory must perform and document calibration procedures-- (1) Following the manufacturer's test system instructions, using calibration materials provided or specified, and with at least the frequency recommended by the manufacturer; (2) Using the criteria verified or established by the laboratory as specified in 493.1253(b) (3)-- (2)(i) Using calibration materials appropriate for the test system and, if possible, traceable to a reference method or reference material of known value; and (2)(ii) Including the number, type, and concentration of calibration materials, as well as acceptable limits for and the frequency of calibration; and (3) Whenever calibration verification fails to meet the laboratory's acceptable limits for calibration verification. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the laboratory's calibration records and interview with the Laboratory Manager(LM)/Testing Personnel #1 (TP1), the laboratory failed to perform and document the calibration for the Coulter AcT Diff Analyzer in 2017. Record review was from June 2016 to April 2018. The findings include: 1. Review of the Coulter AcT diff Analyzer's calibration records for 2016 identified calibration performed on 10/13/16. 2. Review of the Coulter AcT diff Analyzer's calibration records for 2017 identified no calibrations performed in 2017. 3. Review of the Coulter AcT diff Analyzer's calibration records for 2018 identified calibration performed on 4/16/18. 4. On 4/26/18 at approximately 11:50 AM, the LM/TP1 stated that they had not performed calibration in 2017. D5439 CALIBRATION AND CALIBRATION VERIFICATION CFR(s): 493.1255(b) Unless otherwise specified in this subpart, for each applicable test system the Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- laboratory must do the following: Perform and document calibration verification procedure - (b)(1) Following the manufacturer's calibration verification instructions; (b)(2) Using the criteria verified or established by the laboratory under 493.1253(b)(3) -- (b)(2)(i) Including the number, type, and concentration of the materials, as well as acceptable limits for calibration verification; and (b)(2)(ii) Including at least a minimal (or zero) value, a mid-point value, and a maximum value near the upper limit of the range to verify the laboratory's reportable range of test results for the test system; and (b)(3) At least once every 6 months and whenever any of the following occur: (b)(3)(i) A complete change of reagents for a procedure is introduced, unless the laboratory can demonstrate that changing reagent lot numbers does not affect the range used to report patient test results, and control values are not adversely affected by reagent lot number changes. (b)(3)(ii) There is major preventive maintenance or replacement of critical parts that may influence test performance. (b)(3)(iii) Control materials reflect an unusual trend or shift, or are outside of the laboratory's acceptable limits, and other means of assessing and correcting unacceptable control values fail to identify and correct the problem. (b)(3)(iv) The laboratory's established schedule for verifying the reportable range for patient test results requires more frequent calibration verification. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: A. Based on review of the laboratory's calibration/calibration verification records, the Vitros 350 manufacturer's instructions for use and interview with the Laboratory Manager (LM)/Testing Personnel #1 (TP), the laboratory failed to perform and document calibration verification every 6 months for Alanine Aminotransferase, Albumin, Alkaline Phosphotase, Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Bilirubin Direct, Blood Urea, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Creatinine, Creatine Kinase Total, Glucose, High Density Lipoprotein, Magnesium, Phosphorus, Potassium, Total Protein, Sodium, Total Thyroxine, Total Billirubin, Uric Acid, and Vitamin D performed on the Vitros 350. Record review was from June 2016 to April 2018. The findings include:. 1. The manufacturer's instructions for use for the Vitros 350 analytes states, " Calibrate: When the slide lot number changes. When critical system parts are replaced due to service or maintenance. When government regulations require. For example, in the USA, CLIA regulations require calibration or calibration verification at least once every six months" 2. Review of the Vitros 350 calibration /calibration verification records from June 2016 to April 2018 identified no calibration verification for Alanine Aminotransferase, Albumin, Alkaline Phosphotase, Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Bilirubin Direct, Blood Urea, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Creatinine, Creatine Kinase Total, Glucose, High Density Lipoprotein, Magnesium, Phosphorus, Potassium, Prostatic Specific Antigen, Total Protein, Sodium, Total Thyroxine, Total Billirubin, Thyroid Stimulating Hormone, Uric Acid, Vitamin B12, and Vitamin D performed on the Vitros 350 from June 2016 to April 2018. 3. On 4/26/18 at approximately 8:30 AM, the LM/TP1 confirmed the findings. B. Based on review of the laboratory's calibration/calibration verification records, the Vitros ECI manufacturer's instructions for use and interview with the Laboratory Manager (LM)/Testing Personnel #1 (TP), the laboratory failed to perform and document calibration verification every 6 months for Thyroid Stimulating Hormone, Vitamin B12, Prostatic Specific Antigen, and Vitamin D performed on the Vitros ECI. Record review was from June 2016 to April 2018. The findings include:. 1. The manufacturer's instructions for use for the Vitros ECI analytes states, "Calibrate: When the slide lot number changes. When critical system parts are replaced due to service or maintenance. When government regulations require. For example, in the USA, CLIA regulations require calibration or calibration verification at least once -- 2 of 3 -- every six months" 2. Review of the Vitros ECI calibration/calibration verification records from June 2016 to April 2018 identified no calibration verification for Alanine Aminotransferase, Albumin, Alkaline Phosphotase, Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Bilirubin Direct, Blood Urea, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Creatinine, Creatine Kinase Total, Glucose, High Density Lipoprotein, Magnesium, Phosphorus, Potassium, Prostatic Specific Antigen, Total Protein, Sodium, Total Thyroxine, Total Billirubin, Thyroid Stimulating Hormone, Uric Acid, Vitamin B12, and Vitamin D performed on the Vitros ECI from June 2016 to April 2018. 3. On 4/26 /18 at approximately 8:30 AM, the LM/TP1 confirmed the findings. -- 3 of 3 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access