Reproductive Specialists Of The Carolinas

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

3
Total Citations
14
Total Deficiencyies
7
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 34D2210862
Address 1918 Randolph Road, Suite 410, Charlotte, NC, 28207
City Charlotte
State NC
Zip Code28207
Phone(704) 247-2209

Citation History (3 surveys)

Survey - September 15, 2025

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: O62F11

Deficiency Tags: D5439 D5439

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5439 CALIBRATION AND CALIBRATION VERIFICATION CFR(s): 493.1255(b) (b)(1) Following the manufacturer's calibration verification instructions; (b)(2) Using the criteria verified or established by the laboratory under 493.1253(b)(3)-- (b)(2)(i) Including the number, type, and concentration of the materials, as well as acceptable limits for calibration verification; and (b)(2)(ii) Including at least a minimal (or zero) value, a mid-point value, and a maximum value near the upper limit of the range to verify the laboratory's reportable range of test results for the test system; and (b)(3) At least once every 6 months and whenever any of the following occur: (b)(3)(i) A complete change of reagents for a procedure is introduced, unless the laboratory can demonstrate that changing reagent lot numbers does not affect the range used to report patient test results, and control values are not adversely affected by reagent lot number changes. (b)(3)(ii) There is major preventive maintenance or replacement of critical parts that may influence test performance. (b)(3)(iii) Control materials reflect an unusual trend or shift, or are outside of the laboratory's acceptable limits, and other means of assessing and correcting unacceptable control values fail to identify and correct the problem. (b)(3)(iv) The laboratory's established schedule for verifying the reportable range for patient test results requires more frequent calibration verification. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of calibration verification records for the Cobas e411 analyzer, review of the Cobas e411 Calibration Verification policy, and interview with testing personnel (TP1), the laboratory failed to perform calibration verification within six months of the previous calibration. Findings: Review of calibration verification records revealed calibration verifications performed on 2/17/24, 8/2/24, and 6/6/25. The calibration verification was due in February 2025. The laboratories Cobas e411 Calibration Verification policy states, "This three/five-point calibration needs to be Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- performed once every six months." During an interview at approximately 1:25 p.m., TP1 confirmed the Validate calibration verification material was ordered for June 2025 due to confusion with the dates. -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - September 30, 2024

Survey Type: Special

Survey Event ID: FKGK11

Deficiency Tags: D2016 D2107 D2108 D6076 D6089 D2016 D2107 D2108 D6076 D6089

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on desk review of CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Casper reports 153D and 155D 9/23/24 and desk review of 2023 and 2024 CAP (College of American Pathologists) proficiency testing results 9/30/24, the laboratory failed to achieve satisfactory performance for Serum hCG (human chorionic gonadotropin), and failed to achieve overall test event scores of satisfactory for Endocrinology on two consecutive test events, resulting in unsuccessful participation in proficiency testing. Findings: See the deficiencies cited at D2107 and D2108. D2107 ENDOCRINOLOGY Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- CFR(s): 493.843(f) Failure to achieve satisfactory performance for the same analyte or test in two consecutive testing events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on desk review of CMS Casper reports 153D and 155D 9/23/24 and desk review of 2023 and 2024 CAP proficiency testing results 9/30/24, the laboratory failed to achieve satisfactory performance for Serum hCG on two consecutive test events, resulting in unsuccessful performance. Findings: 1. Desk review of CMS Casper reports 153D and 155D and 2023 CAP proficiency testing results revealed the laboratory received a score of 20% for Serum hCG on the CAP K-C 2023 Ligand- General event. 2. Desk review of CMS Casper reports 153D and 155D and 2024 CAP proficiency testing results revealed the laboratory received a score of 40% for Serum hCG on the CAP K-A 2024 Ligand-General event. D2108 ENDOCRINOLOGY CFR(s): 493.843(g) Failure to achieve an overall testing event score of satisfactory performance for two consecutive testing events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on desk review of CMS Casper reports 153D and 155D 9/23/24 and desk review of 2023 and 2024 CAP proficiency testing results 9/30/24, the laboratory failed to achieve an overall test event score of satisfactory performance for Endocrinology on two consecutive test events, resulting in unsuccessful performance. Findings: 1. Desk review of CMS Casper reports 153D and 155D and 2023 CAP proficiency testing results revealed the laboratory received a score of 20% for Serum hCG, resulting in an overall score of 60% for Endocrinology on the CAP K-C 2023 Ligand-General event. 2. Desk review of CMS Casper reports 153D and 155D and 2024 CAP proficiency testing results revealed the laboratory received a score of 40% for Serum hCG, resulting in an overall score of 70% for Endocrinology on the CAP K- A 2024 Ligand-General event. D6076 LABORATORY DIRECTOR CFR(s): 493.1441 The laboratory must have a director who meets the qualification requirements of 493. 1443 of this subpart and provides overall management and direction in accordance with 493.1445 of this subpart. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on desk review of CMS Casper reports 153D and 155D 9/23/24 and desk review of 2023 and 2024 CAP proficiency testing results 9/30/24, the laboratory director failed to provide overall management and direction to ensure successful proficiency testing participation. Findings: See the deficiency cited at D6089. -- 2 of 3 -- D6089 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1445(e)(4)(i) The laboratory director must ensure the proficiency testing samples are tested as required under subpart H of this part. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on desk review of CMS Casper reports 153D and 155D 9/23/24 and desk review of 2023 and 2024 CAP proficiency testing results 9/30/24, the laboratory director failed to ensure successful participation in proficiency testing as required in Subpart H. Findings: See the deficiencies cited at D2107 and D2108. -- 3 of 3 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - October 31, 2023

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: CHYB11

Deficiency Tags: D5421 D5421

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5421 ESTABLISHMENT AND VERIFICATION OF PERFORMANCE CFR(s): 493.1253(b)(1) Each laboratory that introduces an unmodified, FDA-cleared or approved test system must do the following before reporting patient test results: (1)(i) Demonstrate that it can obtain performance specifications comparable to those established by the manufacturer for the following performance characteristics: (1)(i)(A) Accuracy. (1)(i) (B) Precision. (1)(i)(C) Reportable range of test results for the test system. (1)(ii) Verify that the manufacturer's reference intervals (normal values) are appropriate for the laboratory's patient population. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of performance verification records for the Cobas e 411 analyzer, review of 2023 calibration verification records, and interview with the laboratory director (LD) 10/31/23, the laboratory failed to verify the maximum reportable range for the prolactin (PROL) testing performed on the Cobas e 411 analyzer. Findings: The laboratory began patient testing on Cobas e 411 analyzer in December of 2022. Review of performance verification records for PROL, EP Evaluator print date August 3, 2022, revealed the laboratory has a reportable range of 0.047 to 470 ng/mL. The highest values obtained for the verification were 305.1 ng/mL, 309.4 ng/mL and 306.7 ng/mL. The values obtained failed to verify the maximum reportable range of 470 ng/mL. Review of calibration verification records for PROL, dated 7/24/23, revealed a mean of 323.53 ng/mL. The value fails to verify the maximum reportable range of 470 ng/mL. Interview with LD at approximately 11:00 a.m. confirmed the reportable range for the PROL testing on the Cobas e 411 analyzer is 470 ng/mL. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 1 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access