Summary:
Summary Statement of Deficiencies D2006 TESTING OF PROFICIENCY TESTING SAMPLES CFR(s): 493.801(b) The laboratory must examine or test, as applicable, the proficiency testing samples it receives from the proficiency testing program in the same manner as it tests patient specimens. This testing must be conducted in conformance with paragraph (b)(4) of this section. If the laboratory's patient specimen testing procedures would normally require reflex, distributive, or confirmatory testing at another laboratory, the laboratory should test the proficiency testing sample as it would a patient specimen up until the point it would refer a patient specimen to a second laboratory for any form of further testing. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the laboratory's Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygeine (WSLH) proficiency testing records, the laboratory procedure manual, patient test reports and interview with the laboratory director, the laboratory failed to report their proficiency testing results to the proficiency testing program in the same manner as it reported patients in 2021, 2022, and 2023. The findings include: 1. Review of the laboratory's WSLH proficiency testing records from 2021, 2022 and 2023 revealed positive results for mycology cultures were reported to the proficiency testing program as 'present.' 2. Review of the laboratory's procedure manual revealed the following under section 9.1.3 "Fungus is reported to the" "Species level." 3. Review of patient test reports revealed the following: Laboratory records and letters issued to patients revealed reporting of cultures to the genus and species level as follows: Culture date= 03/02 /2021, Batch #1150928, left 1st toenail, read out on 03/31/2021 as "positive for T. rubrum." A letter was issued to the patient on 03/31/2021 with a comment of "The results show a fungus called Trichophyton rubrum." Culture date=01/27/2022, batch #1152747, scalp, read out on 02/09/2022 as "Positive for Trichophyton tonsurans." A letter was issued to the patient on 02/09/2022 with a comment of "The results show a fungus called Tricophyton tonsurans." Culture date=01/19/2023, batch #1153622, Lt. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 5 -- 2nd toenail, read out as positive for multiple Candida. A letter was issued to the patient on 02/23/2023 with a comment of "The results show a fungus called Candida albicans." 4. Interview with the laboratory director on 10/09/23 at 11:30 am confirmed the laboratory failed to report fungal culture results to the WSLH proficiency testing program in the same manner as it reported patient results in 2021, 2022 and 2023. D2038 MYCOLOGY CFR(s): 493.827(a) Failure to attain an overall testing event score of at least 80 percent is unsatisfactory performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation of the laboratory, review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Casper Report 0155D (CMS 155), the laboratory's proficiency testing records and interview with the laboratory director, the laboratory failed to maintain satisfactory participation in mycology for 2023 event two. The findings include: 1. Observation of the laboratory on 10/09/23 at 8 am revealed multiple patient samples for fungal culture being incubated at ambient room temperature. 2. Review of the CMS 155 revealed an overall event score of 75% for 2023 event two for mycology. 3. Review of the laboratory's proficiency testing records revealed an overall event score of 75% for 2023 event two for mycology. 4. Interview with the lab director on 10/09 /23 at 11:30 am confirmed the laboratory failed to maintain satisfactory performance for mycology for 2023 event two. D2044 MYCOLOGY CFR(s): 493.827(d) (1) For any unsatisfactory testing event for reasons other than a failure to participate, the laboratory must undertake appropriate training and employ the technical assistance necessary to correct problems associated with a proficiency testing failure. (2) Remedial action must be taken and documented, and the documentation must be maintained by the laboratory for two years from the date of participation in the proficiency testing event. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the laboratory's proficiency testing records and interview with the laboratory director, the laboratory failed to perform