Rochester Primary Care

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

5
Total Citations
22
Total Deficiencyies
9
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 23D2080840
Address 1349 S Rochester Rd Ste 100, Rochester Hills, MI, 48307
City Rochester Hills
State MI
Zip Code48307
Phone586 531-5916
Lab DirectorRAMKRISHNA SURENDRAN

Citation History (5 surveys)

Survey - January 4, 2024

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: 9E9711

Deficiency Tags: D3031 D5305 D5417 D5421 D6004 D5305 D5417 D5421 D6004

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D3031 RETENTION REQUIREMENTS CFR(s): 493.1105(a)(3) Analytic systems records. Retain quality control and patient test records (including instrument printouts, if applicable) and records documenting all analytic systems activities specified in 493.1252 through 493.1289 for at least 2 years. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: . Based on record review and interview with the Technical Consultant, the laboratory failed to retain calibration documentation for 1 (October 2023) of 4 calibration events reviewed for its Horiba hematology analyzer. Findings include: 1. A review of the laboratory's Horiba hematology analyzer's calibration documentation revealed the manufacturer's service representative performed service and calibration on 10/2/23. 2. The surveyor requested the laboratory's documentation of the calibration performed on 10/2/23 on 10:52 am and it was not made available. 3. An interview on 1/4/24 at 11:04 am with the Technical Consultant confirmed documentation of the calibration performed on 10/2/23 was not available. D5305 TEST REQUEST CFR(s): 493.1241(c) The laboratory must ensure the test requisition solicits the following information: (1) The name and address or other suitable identifiers of the authorized person requesting the test and, if appropriate, the individual responsible for using the test results, or the name and address of the laboratory submitting the specimen, including, as applicable, a contact person to enable the reporting of imminently life threatening laboratory results or panic or alert values. (2) The patient's name or unique patient identifier. (3) The sex and age or date of birth of the patient. (4) The test(s) to be performed. (5) The source of the specimen, when appropriate. (6) The date and, if appropriate, time of specimen collection. (7) For Pap smears, the patient's last menstrual period, and Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 4 -- indication of whether the patient had a previous abnormal report, treatment, or biopsy. (8) Any additional information relevant and necessary for a specific test to ensure accurate and timely testing and reporting of results, including interpretation, if applicable. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: . Based on record review and interview with the Technical Consultant, the laboratory failed to include the date and time of specimen collection for its hematology and routine chemistry testing on the request for testing for 7 (Patient's 1-7) of 7 patient test requests reviewed. Findings include: 1. A review of 10 patient test requests revealed the following patients had a lack of date and time of specimen collection: a. Patient #1 had a Complete Blood Count (CBC) and a Complete Metabolic Panel (CMP) performed on 11/21/23 and 11/22/23 respectively. b. Patient #2 had a CBC and a Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP) performed on 9/13/23. c. Patient #3 had a CBC and a Lipid Panel performed on 7/17/23. d. Patient #4 had a CBC and a BMP performed on 3/31/23. e. Patient #5 had a CBC and a BMP performed on 1/3/23. f. Patient #6 had a CBC and a BMP performed on 11/1/22. g. Patient #7 had a CBC and a BMP performed on 10/20/22. 2. An interview on 1/4/24 at 11:32 am with the Technical Consultant confirmed the laboratory did not document the date and time of specimen collection on the test requests for the patients listed above. D5417 TEST SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, REAGENT CFR(s): 493.1252(d) Reagents, solutions, culture media, control materials, calibration materials, and other supplies must not be used when they have exceeded their expiration date, have deteriorated, or are of substandard quality. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: . Based on observation and interview with the Technical Consultant, the laboratory failed to ensure its sodium citrate blue-top BD Vacutainer blood specimen collection tubes had not exceeded their expiration date for 24 of 24 blue-top tubes available for use in the draw station. Findings include. 1. The surveyor observed 24 sodium citrate blue-top BD Vacutainer blood specimen collection tubes with the expiration date of 12 /31/23 in the phlebotomy draw station on 1/4/24 at 8:59 am. 2. An interview on 1/4/24 at 9:10 am with the Technical Consultant confirmed the sodium citrate blue-top BD Vacutainer blood specimen collection tubes had exceeded their expiration date. D5421 ESTABLISHMENT AND VERIFICATION OF PERFORMANCE CFR(s): 493.1253(b)(1) Each laboratory that introduces an unmodified, FDA-cleared or approved test system must do the following before reporting patient test results: (1)(i) Demonstrate that it can obtain performance specifications comparable to those established by the manufacturer for the following performance characteristics: (1)(i)(A) Accuracy. (1)(i) (B) Precision. (1)(i)(C) Reportable range of test results for the test system. (1)(ii) Verify that the manufacturer's reference intervals (normal values) are appropriate for the laboratory's patient population. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: -- 2 of 4 -- . Based on record review and interview with the Technical Consultant, the laboratory failed to verify the reportable range of its routine chemistry testing on the Alfa Wassermann Ace Axcel analyzer for 13 of 17 analytes. Findings include: 1. An interview on 1/4/24 at 8:51 am with the Technical Consultant revealed the laboratory started testing using the Alfa Wassermann Ace Axcel chemistry analyzer in February 2022. 2. A review of the laboratory's verification of performance specifications for the Alfa Wassermann Ace Axcel chemistry analyzer and the instrument reportable range settings revealed the laboratory failed to verify the breadth of the reportable range for the following analytes: a. Total Protein linearity study ranged 2.2 to 11.0 g/dL and the instrument settings were 0.4 to 14.0 g/dL. b. High-Density Lipoproteins (HDL) Cholesterol linearity study ranged 11.0 to 102.0 mg/dL and the instrument settings were "N/A." c. Total Cholesterol linearity study ranged 18.0 to 527 mg/dL and the instrument settings were "N/A." d. Glucose linearity study ranged 6.0 to 594 mg/dL and the instrument settings were 4 to 750 mg/dL. e. Triglycerides linearity study ranged 23 to 877 mg/dL and the instrument settings were 16 to 1000 mg/dL. f. Albumin linearity study ranged 1.6 to 6.4 g/dL and the instrument settings were 0.3 to 7/0 g/dL. g. Creatinine linearity study ranged 0.46 to 23.563 mg/dL and the instrument settings were "N/A." h. Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) linearity study ranged 1.0 to 95.333 mg/dL and the instrument settings were 0 to 100 mg/dL. i. Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) linearity study ranged 4.667 to 1,228 IU/L and the instrument settings were 1 to 1,400 IU/L. j. Alanine Transaminase (ALT) linearity study ranged 13.0 to 408.333 IU/L and the instrument settings were 4 to 480 IU/L. k. Calcium linearity study ranged 1.8 to 13.367 mg/dL and the instrument settings were 0.4 to 15.0 mg/dL. l. Total Bilirubin linearity study ranged 0.567 to 38.967 mg/dL and the instrument settings were "N/A." m. Aspartate Transaminase (AST) linearity study ranged 13.333 to 388.0 IU/L and the instrument settings were 4 to 450 IU/L. 3. An interview on 1/4/24 at 10:43 am with the Technical Consultant confirmed the analytes above had reportable limits outside the reportable range study performed as part of the verification of performance specifications. D6004 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1407(a)(b) The laboratory director is responsible for the overall operation and administration of the laboratory, including the employment of personnel who are competent to perform test procedures, and record and report test results promptly, accurate, and proficiently and for assuring compliance with the applicable regulations. (a) The laboratory director, if qualified, may perform the duties of the technical consultant, clinical consultant, and testing personnel, or delegate these responsibilities to personnel meeting the qualifications of 493.1409, 493.1415, and 493.1421, respectively. (b) If the laboratory director reapportions performance of his or her responsibilities, he or she remains responsible for ensuring that all duties are properly performed. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: . Based on record review and interviews, the Laboratory Director failed to notify the State Agency when adding a new testing specialty in accordance with 493.51 for 23 (February 2022 to January 20240 of 23 months since the laboratory added its routine chemistry testing. Findings include: 1. An interview on 1/4/24 at 8:51 am with the Technical Consultant revealed the laboratory started testing using the Alfa Wassermann Ace Axcel chemistry analyzer in February 2022 and had not notified the State Agency in accordance with 493.51 Notification Requirements for Laboratories Issued a Certificate of Compliance. 2. The surveyor reviewed the CMS database for -- 3 of 4 -- the laboratory revealed a lack of documentation of the laboratory adding routine chemistry testing. -- 4 of 4 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - November 2, 2023

Survey Type: Special

Survey Event ID: SY1I11

Deficiency Tags: D2016 D2096 D2016 D2096

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: . Based on record review of the CMS database and the American Proficiency Institute proficiency testing reports, it was determined the laboratory failed to successfully participate in a CMS-approved proficiency testing program for the routine chemistry analyte total bilirubin. Findings include: The laboratory failed to attain a score of at least 80% of acceptable responses for the chemistry analyte total bilirubin, which is unsatisfactory performance. Refer to D2096. D2096 ROUTINE CHEMISTRY CFR(s): 493.841(f) Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- Failure to achieve satisfactory performance for the same analyte or test in two consecutive testing events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: . Based on review of the CMS database and the American Proficiency Institute proficiency testing reports, the laboratory failed to attain a score of at least 80% of acceptable responses for the chemistry analyte total bilirubin, which is unsatisfactory performance for 2 (1st and 3rd events of 2023) of 3 consecutive testing events. Findings include: A review of the CMS database and the American Proficiency Institute proficiency testing reports revealed the following proficiency testing results for total bilirubin: PT Event Total Bilirubin Score 1st event 2023 60% 3rd event 2023 60% -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - April 10, 2023

Survey Type: Special

Survey Event ID: ZSZY11

Deficiency Tags: D2016 D2096 D2096

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: . Based on record review of the CMS database and the American Proficiency Institute (API) proficiency testing reports, it was determined the laboratory failed to successfully participate in a CMS-approved proficiency testing program for the chemistry analyte total bilirubin. Findings include: The laboratory failed to attain a score of at least 80% of acceptable responses for the chemistry analyte total bilirubin, which is unsatisfactory performance. Refer to D2096. D2096 ROUTINE CHEMISTRY CFR(s): 493.841(f) Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- Failure to achieve satisfactory performance for the same analyte or test in two consecutive testing events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: . Based on review of the CMS database and the American Proficiency Institute (API) proficiency testing reports, the laboratory failed to attain a score of at least 80% of acceptable responses for the chemistry analyte total bilirubin, which is unsatisfactory performance for 2 (2022 2nd event and 2023 1st event) of 3 consecutive testing events. Findings include: PT Event Iron Score 2nd event 2022 20% 1st event 2023 60% -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - December 20, 2021

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: L41111

Deficiency Tags: D5803 D5803

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5803 TEST REPORT CFR(s): 493.1291(b) Test report information maintained as part of the patient's chart or medical record must be readily available to the laboratory and to CMS or a CMS agent upon request. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: . Based on record review and interview with Testing Personnel #1 (TP1), the laboratory failed to provide test reports maintained as part of the patients' chart for 2 (Patients #1 and #2) of 10 patient test reports reviewed. Findings include: 1. A review of the laboratory's Complete Blood Count (CBC) patient test reports revealed the following patients did not have test reports available as part of their patient charts: a. Patient 1, tested on 12/3/21 b. Patient 2, tested on 10/4/21 2. An interview on 12/20/21 at 10:15 am with TP1 confirmed the laboratory did not provide test reports maintained as part of the patients' charts for the patients listed above. ***This is a repeated deficiency from the 12/23/19 recertification survey*** Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 1 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - December 23, 2019

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: 4X8511

Deficiency Tags: D5785 D5803 D5785 D5803

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5785

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access