Solano Dermatology Associates

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

2
Total Citations
5
Total Deficiencyies
5
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 05D1078752
Address 600 Nut Tree Rd, Ste 260, Vacaville, CA, 95687
City Vacaville
State CA
Zip Code95687
Phone(707) 452-7222

Citation History (2 surveys)

Survey - October 15, 2025

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: 9TQ511

Deficiency Tags: D5435 D5417 D6093

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5417 TEST SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, REAGENT CFR(s): 493.1252(d) (d) Reagents, solutions, culture media, control materials, calibration materials, and other supplies must not be used when they have exceeded their expiration date, have deteriorated, or are of substandard quality. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on the surveyor's observation during the laboratory tour, examination of laboratory reagent materials and solutions, and an interview with the office manager (OM); it was determined that the laboratory failed in using reagent materials and solutions when it had exceeded its expiration date. The findings include: 1. The laboratory performed Mohs and used reagent materials and solutions beyond its expiration and were continuously used for patient testing. Specific examples include: a. Tissue marking dye (TMD) Reagent / Solution Lot # Expiry date i. Green TMD 23187 7-31-2025 ii. Yellow TMD 23193 7-31-2025 iii. Red TMD 23209 7-31-2025 iv. Blue TMD 23188 7-31-2025 b. OCT compound (Embedding medium) Lot number Expiry date Bottle count i. 5079-00 9/30/2025 11 ii. 4393-00 2/28/2025 1 2. The OM affirmed by interview on October 15, 2025 at approximately 3:30 p.m. that the laboratory used the reagent materials and solutions beyond its expiration date for patient testing without noticing nor checking the label during their quality assessment checks. 3 According to the testing declaration submitted at the time of survey, the laboratory tested and reported approximately 250 patient samples for Dermatopathology during the time when reagent materials and solutions used were past its expiration date. Thus, the quality and accuracy of patient results cannot be assured. D5435 MAINTENANCE AND FUNCTION CHECKS CFR(s): 493.1254(b)(2) Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- (b)(2)(i) Define a function check protocol that ensures equipment, instrument, and test system performance that is necessary for accurate and reliable test results and test result reporting. (b)(2)(ii) Perform and document the function checks, including background or baseline checks, specified in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section. Function checks must be within the laboratory's established limits before patient testing is conducted. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on the surveyor's review of the laboratory's policy and procedure, preventive maintenance (PM) documentation, five (5) patient records for Dermatopathology, and an interview with the office manager (OM), it was determined that the laboratory failed to ensure performed tests and function checks were documented or maintained prior to patient testing. The findings include: 1. The surveyor reviewed the policy for PM documentation, which indicated that all PM performed on the cryostat should be recorded prior to patient testing. However, this protocol was not followed on October 18, 2024, wherein the temperature of the cryostat was missed to be recorded impacting a total of five patients examined by the provider that day. 2. Five Dermatopathology patient records were reviewed by the surveyor and found one with a recorded out-of-range temperature on November 8, 2023. Further review revealed that there were two other patients that were examined that day Thus, quality and reliability of patient tests reported cannot be assured. 3. The OM affirmed by an interview on October 15, 2025, at approximately 2:35 p.m. that the PM entries were overlooked during the daily quality assessment check. 4. According to the testing declaration form submitted at the time of the survey, the laboratory performed and reported approximately 250 Dermatopathology cases, which included the period when errors in the cryostat temperature occurred as mentioned in this deficiency. D6093 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1445(e)(5) (e)(5) Ensure that the quality control and quality assessment programs are established and maintained to assure the quality of laboratory services provided and to identify failures in quality as they occur; This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on the surveyor's review of the laboratory's policy and procedure, randomly selected patient test records, preventive maintenance documentation, and an interview with the medical assistant on October 15, 2025; the laboratory director is herein cited due to failure to ensure that several aspects of the preanalytical and postanalytic phases of the laboratory testing were monitored. The findings include: 1. Use of expired reagent materials and solutions. See D5417 2. Preventive maintenance errors. See D5435. -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - September 28, 2023

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: TMB111

Deficiency Tags: D5217 D5891

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D5217 EVALUATION OF PROFICIENCY TESTING PERFORMANCE CFR(s): 493.1236(c)(1) At least twice annually, the laboratory must verify the accuracy of any test or procedure it performs that is not included in subpart I of this part. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of laboratory records, the lack of records, and interview with a laboratory administrative person, the laboratory failed to verify the accuracy of Mohs procedures at least twice in 2022. Findings included: 1. It was the practice of the laboratory to select several cases of Mohs procedures from different dates for slides review ("Peer review") as the means to satisfy the requirement to verify the accuracy of testing at least twice annually. 2. Records for 2022 documented only one case was reviewed to verify accuracy. 3. The laboratory administrative person affirmed (9/28 /23 at 3:30 pm) the single case in 2022 was a permanent slide and that no additional slides from routine Mohs procedures had been selected for Peer review. 4. And thus, the accuracy, reliability, and quality of Mohs procedures performed in 2022 were not assured. 5. The laboratory performed 167 Mohs procedures annually (CMS116- CLIA Application, 9/12/23). . D5891 POSTANALYTIC SYSTEMS QUALITY ASSESSMENT CFR(s): 493.1299(a) The laboratory must establish and follow written policies and procedures for an ongoing mechanism to monitor, assess and, when indicated, correct problems identified in the postanalytic systems specified in 493.1291. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on the deficiency cited and interview with the laboratory administrative person, Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- the laboratory failed to establish a written policy and procedure for an ongoing practice to monitor, assess, and when identified, correct problems in the postanalytic systems. Findings included: 1. The laboratory failed to monitor records in 2022. See D5217. . -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access