University Of Miami Diabetes Research

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

5
Total Citations
19
Total Deficiencyies
14
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 10D0671907
Address 1450 Nw 10th Ave Room 3033, Miami, FL, 33136
City Miami
State FL
Zip Code33136
Phone(305) 243-3636

Citation History (5 surveys)

Survey - August 14, 2025

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: ZK5Y11

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D3007

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 An announced CLIA recertification survey was conducted at UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI DIABETES RESEARCH from 08/13/2025 to 08/14/2025. The laboratory was not in compliance with 42 CFR Part 493, Requirements for Laboratories. The following is a description of the standard level deficiency: D3007 FACILITIES CFR(s): 493.1101(b) (b) The laboratory must have appropriate and sufficient equipment, instruments, reagents, materials, and supplies for the type and volume of testing it performs. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review and Laboratory Director (LD) interview the laboratory was running patient samples and research samples in the same analyzer and with the same supplies from 10/04/2025 to 07/14/2025. Findings included: 1-During the tour of the laboratory on 08/13/2025 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor observed the following analyzers: one Roche Cobas C501 and one Roche Cobas E601. 2-Review of Patient #1 results revealed that the laboratory tested on 10/04/2025 at 4:44 PM for C- Peptide, Insulin and Hemoglobin A1C and tested P#2 on 07/14/2025 at 10:18 AM. 3- Review of instrument print outs for Research samples from the same analyzers revealed that the laboratory tested 3 research samples (R#1, R#2 and R#3) for C- peptide and Insulin on 10/04/2025 at11:41 AM and the laboratory tested on 07/15 /2025 at 10:51 AM nine research samples (R#1, R#2, R#3, R#5, R#6, R#7, R#8 and R#9) for A1-C. 3- The laboratory had no documentation of using separate reagents and separate times for the Clinical and Research operation. During an interview on 08 /13/2025 at 3:30 PM, the LD confirmed that laboratory failed to have separate reagents and time for Clinical and Research operation. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 1 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - September 22, 2023

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: 4CFK11

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D5791 D5781 D6021

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A recertification survey conducted from 09/07/2023 to 09/22/2023 found the UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI DIABETES RESEARCH clinical laboratory not in compliance with 42 CFR Part 493, Requirements for Laboratories. D5781

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - December 20, 2022

Survey Type: Special

Survey Event ID: PUDV11

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D2096 D6016 D2016 D6000

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A desk review survey of the laboratory's proficiency test results was performed on December 20, 2022 for University of Miami Diabetes Research Institute and Clinical Lab. University of Miami Diabetes Research Institute and Clinical Lab is not in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 493, Laboratory Requirements D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the laboratory's proficiency testing records for 2022, the laboratory did not have successful performance in proficiency testing for analytes in the subspecialty of routine chemistry. Refer to D2096. Findings include: Review of Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- the College of American Pathologists (CAP) proficiency testing records and the review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) 153 and 155 reports, on December 20, 2022 on or about 1:00 PM, showed that the laboratory had unsatisfactory testing scores for the analyte, sodium for two consecutive testing events in 2022. D2096 ROUTINE CHEMISTRY CFR(s): 493.841(f) Failure to achieve satisfactory performance for the same analyte or test in two consecutive testing events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on the review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) 153 and 155 reports and the laboratory's proficiency testing records, the laboratory did not have successful performance in proficiency testing for analytes in the subspecialty of routine chemistry. Findings include: On December 20, 2022 on or about 1:00 PM the College of American pathologists (CAP) proficiency testing records and the CMS 153 and 155 reports were reviewed. The review showed that the laboratory failed to achieve satisfactory performance for the analyte, sodium, as shown below. Event #2, 2022 sodium-40% Event #3, 2022 sodium-0% D6000 MODERATE COMPLEXITY LABORATORY DIRECTOR CFR(s): 493.1403 The laboratory must have a director who meets the qualification requirements of 493. 1405 of this subpart and provides overall management and direction in accordance with 493.1407 of this subpart. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on the review of the laboratory's proficiency testing records, the laboratory director failed to ensure that the laboratory maintained a satisfactory score in proficiency testing for analytes found in the subspecialty of routine chemistry. Findings include: On December 20, 2022, on or about 1:00 PM, the College of American Pathologists (CAP) proficiency records and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service (CMS) 153 and 155 reports were reviewed. The review showed that the laboratory had unsatisfactory testing scores for two consecutive testing events for the analyte, sodium, in the subspecialty of routine chemistry. The laboratory director is responsible for ensuring that the laboratory maintains successful participation in proficiency testing. Refer to D2096. D6016 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1407(e)(4)(i) The laboratory director is responsible for the overall operation and administration of the laboratory, including the employment of personnel who are competent to perform test procedures, and record and report test results promptly, accurate, and proficiently and for assuring compliance with the applicable regulations. (e) The laboratory director must-- (e)(4)(i) Ensure that the proficiency testing samples are tested as required under Subpart H of this part; -- 2 of 3 -- This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on the review of the laboratory's proficiency testing scores, the laboratory director failed to ensure that the laboratory performed proficiency testing in such a manner as to achieve and maintain successful participation in proficiency testing for analytes found in the subspecialty of routine chemistry. Findings Include: The review of the College of American Pathologists (CAP) proficiency testing records and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) 153 and 155 reports on December 20, 2022, on or about 1:00 PM showed that the laboratory received unsatisfactory proficiency testing scores for two out of three testing events for the analytes shown below. Event #2, 2022 sodium-40% Event #3, 2022 sodium-0% -- 3 of 3 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - October 23, 2019

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: 1JT511

Deficiency Tags: D2087 D5413 D0000 D5209

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 A recertification survey conducted on 10/23/2019 found that the University of Miami Diabetes Research clinical laboratory was not in compliance with 42 CFR Part 493, Requirements for Laboratories. D2087 ROUTINE CHEMISTRY CFR(s): 493.841(a) Failure to attain a score of at least 80 percent of acceptable responses for each analyte in each testing event is unsatisfactory analyte performance for the testing event. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review of College of American Pathologists (CAP) proficiency testing records and interview with General Supervisor (GS), the laboratory failed to score at least 80 % on Potassium (K) and Sodium (Na) for 1 (2nd event of 2019) out of 6 (2017 3rd ; 2018 1, 2 and 3rd; 2019 1st and 2nd) events for Routine Chemistry reviewed. Findings include: Review of CAP proficiency records revealed a score of 60 % for K and 0 % for Na in the 2nd event of 2019. During an interview on 10/23 /2019 at 11:30 AM, the GS confirmed the failed proficiency testing score. D5209 PERSONNEL COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT POLICIES CFR(s): 493.1235 As specified in the personnel requirements in subpart M, the laboratory must establish and follow written policies and procedures to assess employee and, if applicable, consultant competency. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and staff interview, the laboratory failed to perform annual competency assessment for 1 out of 2 testing personnel (TP) for 2 out of 2 years Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- reviewed and failed to perform initial and semiannual competency assessment for 1 TP that started in 2019. Findings include: 1)Review of CMS 209 Laboratory Personnel Report form, dated and signed by the Laboratory Director on 10/17/2019 revealed that: -The Laboratory Director, Clinical Consultant and Technical Supervisor was the same person. -General Supervisor was also Testing personnel (TP) # A. -TP# B started in the laboratory in February 2019. 2) Review of personnel files revealed that there was no documentation of the annual competency assessment for TP # A for 2018 and 2019 3) TP # B started on 2/2019 in that position. There was no initial and 6 months competency assessment documented for TP # B. During an interview on 10/23 /2019 at 11:00 AM, with GS, she confirmed that there was no documentation of the competency assessments listed above for the period of reference. D5413 TEST SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, REAGENT CFR(s): 493.1252(b) The laboratory must define criteria for those conditions that are essential for proper storage of reagents and specimens, accurate and reliable test system operation, and test result reporting. The criteria must be consistent with the manufacturer's instructions, if provided. These conditions must be monitored and documented and, if applicable, include the following: (1) Water quality. (2) Temperature. (3) Humidity. (4) Protection of equipment and instruments from fluctuations and interruptions in electrical current that adversely affect patient test results and test reports. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the analyzer manual and staff interview, the laboratory failed to document room humidity and temperature requirement to ensure optimal operation for the Cobas 6000 Analyzer for 2 out of 2 years reviewed. The findings include: A review of Cobas 6000 Analyzer manual revealed a requirement for optimal operation, of a range of room temperature of 18 to 32 degrees C., and humidity between 30 to 85 %. A review of temperature logs for 2018 and 2019, revealed no documentation of room humidity and temperature. During an interview on 10/23/19 at 9:30am, the General Supervisor (GS) confirmed that there was no documentation of the room temperature and humidity for the period of reference. -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - May 7, 2018

Survey Type: Special

Survey Event ID: C6CD11

Deficiency Tags: D2016 D6076 D2096 D6089

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the laboratory's proficiency testing records for 2017 and 2018, the laboratory did not have successful performance in proficiency testing for the subspecialty of routine chemistry. Refer to D2096. Findings include: Review of the College of American Pathologists (CAP) proficiency testing records and the review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) 153 and 155 reports, on May 7, 2018 on or about 10:00 AM, showed that the laboratory had unsatisfactory testing scores for the analyte, amylase, for two out of three testing events in 2017 and 2018. D2096 ROUTINE CHEMISTRY Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- CFR(s): 493.841(f) Failure to achieve satisfactory performance for the same analyte or test in two consecutive testing events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on the review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) 153 and 155 reports and the laboratory's proficiency testing records, the laboratory did not have successful participation in proficiency testing for the subspecialty of routine chemistry. Findings include: On May 7, 2018 on or about 10:00 AM the Collage of American Pathologists CAP proficiency testing records and the CMS 153 and 155 reports were reviewed. The review showed that the laboratory failed to achieve satisfactory performance for the analyte, amylase, as shown below. Event #3, 2017 Amylase-0% Event #1, 2018 Amylase-0% D6076 LABORATORY DIRECTOR CFR(s): 493.1441 The laboratory must have a director who meets the qualification requirements of 493. 1443 of this subpart and provides overall management and direction in accordance with 493.1445 of this subpart. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on the review of the laboratory's proficiency testing records, the laboratory director failed to ensure that the laboratory maintained a satisfactory score for proficiency testing in the subspecialty of routine chemistry. Findings include: On May 7, 2018, on or about 10:00 AM, the College of American Pathologists (CAP) proficiency records and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service (CMS) 153 and 155 reports were reviewed. The review showed that the laboratory had unsatisfactory testing scores for two out of three testing events for the analyte, Amylase, in the sub- specialty of routine chemistry. The laboratory director is responsible for ensuring that the laboratory maintains successful participation in proficiency testing. Refer to D2096. D6089 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1445(e)(4)(i) The laboratory director must ensure the proficiency testing samples are tested as required under subpart H of this part. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on the review of the laboratory's proficiency testing scores, the laboratory director failed to ensure that the laboratory performed proficiency testing in such a manner as to achieve and maintain successful participation in proficiency testing in the subspecialty of routine chemistry. Findings Include: The review of the College of American Pathologists (CAP) proficiency testing records and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) 153 and 155 reports on May 7, 2018 on or -- 2 of 3 -- about 10:00 AM showed that the laboratory received unsatisfactory proficiency testing scores as shown below. Event #3, 2017 Amylase-0% Event #1, 2018 Amylase- 0% -- 3 of 3 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access