Summary:
Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 An announced CLIA recertification survey was conducted at UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI HOSPITAL AND CLINICS - CORAL SPRINGS on August 18, 2025. The laboratory was not in compliance with 42 CFR Part 493, Requirements for Laboratories. The following is a description of the standard level deficiencies: D6047 TECHNICAL CONSULTANT RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1413(b(8)(i) (b)(8)(i) Direct observations of routine patient test performance, including patient preparation, if applicable, specimen handling, processing and testing; This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and staff interview, the Technical Consultant (TC) or a designee failed to do direct observation of patient testing during competency evaluation for testing personnel (TP) for one out three TP in 2025. Findings included: 1-Review of FORM CMS 209 signed by the Laboratory Director on 08/18/2025, revealed the following: Laboratory Director (LD) was also Clinical Consultant and Technical Supervisor for Hematology specialty. The laboratory had one Technical Consultant (TC) for Chemistry specialty, had two General Supervisors (GS) for Hematology specialty (GS)#1 that was also TP#3 and GS#2 and TP#1, TP#2. 2- Review of personnel records revealed that annual competency for TP#3 for the Integra 400 in Chemistry specialty, revealed that the annual competency for patient testing was observed by TP#2 on 08/08/2025. TP#2 had no delegation letter to do competency. 3-During an interview on 08/18/2025 at 12:30 PM, the GS#1 confirmed that the TC failed to observe patient testing observation during annual competency for TP#3 on 08/08/2025. D6050 TECHNICAL CONSULTANT RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1413(b)(8)(iv) Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- (b)(8)(iv) Direct observation of performance of instrument maintenance and function checks; This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and staff interview, the Technical Consultant (TC) or a designee failed to do direct observation of performance of instrument and function check during competency evaluation for one testing personnel (TP) out of three on 2025. Findings included: 1-Review of FORM CMS 209 signed by the Laboratory Director on 08/18/2025, revealed the following: Laboratory Director (LD) was also Clinical Consultant and Technical Supervisor for Hematology specialty. The laboratory had one Technical Consultant (TC) for Chemistry specialty, had two General Supervisors (GS) for Hematology specialty (GS)#1 that was also TP#3 and GS#2 and had P#1, and TP#2. 2-Review of personnel records revealed that annual competency for TP#3, the direct observation of performance of instrument and function check for Integra 400 for Chemistry specialty was observed by TP#2 on 08/08 /2025. TP#2 had no delegation letter to do competency. 3-During an interview on 08 /18/2025 at 12:30 PM, the GS#1 confirmed that the TC failed to do direct observation of performance of instrument and function check during annual competency for TP#3 on 08/08/2025. D6121 TECHNICAL SUPERVISOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1451(b)(8)(i) The procedures for evaluation of the competency of the staff must include, but are not limited to-- (b)(8)(i) Direct observations of routine patient test performance, including patient preparation, if applicable, specimen handling, processing and testing; This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and staff interview, the Technical Supervisor (TS) or a designee failed to do direct observation of patient testing during competency evaluation for one testing personnel (TP) out of three in 2025. Findings included: 1- Review of FORM CMS 209 signed by the Laboratory Director on 08/18/2025, revealed the following: Laboratory Director (LD) was also Clinical Consultant and Technical Supervisor for Hematology specialty. The laboratory had one Technical Consultant (TC) for Chemistry specialty, had two General Supervisor (GS), (GS)#1 that was also TP#3 and GS#2 and had TP#1 and TP#2. 2-Review of personnel records revealed that annual competency for TP#3 for the Sysmex XN-10 for Hematology specialty, patient testing was observed by TP#2 on 08/08/2025. TP#2 had no delegation letter to do competency. 3-During an interview on 08/18/2025 at 12:30 PM, the GS confirmed that the TS failed to do direct observation of patient testing during annual competency for TP#3 on 08/08/2025. D6124 TECHNICAL SUPERVISOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1451(b)(8)(iv) (b)(8)(iv) Direct observation of performance of instrument maintenance and function checks; This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and staff interview, the Technical Supervisor (TS) or a -- 2 of 3 -- designee failed to do direct observation of performance of instrument and function check during competency evaluation for one out of three testing personnel (TP) on 2025. Findings included: 1-Review of FORM CMS 209 signed by the Laboratory Director on 08/18/2025, revealed the following: Laboratory Director (LD) was also Clinical Consultant and Technical Supervisor for Hematology specialty. The laboratory had one Technical Consultant (TC) for Chemistry specialty, had two General Supervisors (GS)#1 that was also TP#3 and GS#2 and had TP#1 and TP#2. 2- Review of personnel records revealed that annual competency for TP#3, direct observation of performance of instrument and function check for Sysmex XN-10 for Hematology specialty was observed by TP#2 on 08/08/2025. TP#2 had no delegation letter to do competency. 3-During an interview on 08/18/2025 at 12:30 PM, the GS#1 confirmed that the TS or a designee failed to do direct observation of performance of instrument and function check during annual competency for TP#3 on 08/08/2025. -- 3 of 3 --