Unt Student Health And Wellness Center Lab

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 Based on a proficiency testing desk review survey performed on March 24, 2025, the laboratory was found to be out of compliance based on the following CONDITION LEVEL DEFICIENCIES: D2016 - 42 C.F.R. 493.803 Condition: Successful participation D6000 - 42 C.F.R. 493.1403 Condition: Laboratory Director, moderate complexity D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on a proficiency testing desk review of the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting (CASPER) Report 155 Individual Laboratory Profile, and the American Proficiency Institute (API) Performance Summary, the laboratory failed to Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- achieve satisfactory performance (80% or greater) for the analyte glucose for two consecutive testing events in 2024 (Event 3) and 2025 (Event 1), resulting in an initial unsuccessful performance. Refer to D2096. D2096 ROUTINE CHEMISTRY CFR(s): 493.841(f) (f) Failure to achieve satisfactory performance for the same analyte or test in two consecutive testing events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a proficiency testing desk review of the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting (CASPER) Report 155 Individual Laboratory Profile, and the American Proficiency Institute (API) Performance Summary, the laboratory failed to achieve satisfactory performance (80% or greater) for the analyte glucose for two consecutive testing events in 2024 (Event 3) and 2025 (Event 1). Findings include: 1. Review of the CASPER Report 155 Individual Laboratory Profile, the laboratory received the following unsatisfactory performances for the analyte glucose for two consecutive testing events: 2024 3rd event: 40% 2025 1st event: 40% 2. Review of the API Performance Summary, the laboratory received the following unsatisfactory performances for the analyte glucose for two consecutive testing events: Routine Chemistry 2024 3rd Event: 40% 2025 1st Event: 40% D6000 MODERATE COMPLEXITY LABORATORY DIRECTOR CFR(s): 493.1403 The laboratory must have a director who meets the qualification requirements of 493. 1405 of this subpart and provides overall management and direction in accordance with 493.1407 of this subpart. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on a proficiency testing desk review of the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting (CASPER) Report 155 Individual Laboratory Profile, and the American Proficiency Institute (API) Performance Summary, the laboratory director failed ensure successful participation in an HHS approved proficiency testing program for the analyte glucose for two consecutive testing events in 2024 (Event 3) and 2025 (Event 1). Refer to D6016. D6016 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1407(e)(4)(i) (e)(4)(i) The proficiency testing samples are tested as required under Subpart H of this part; This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a proficiency testing desk review of the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting (CASPER) Report 155 Individual Laboratory Profile, and the American Proficiency Institute (API) Performance Summary, the laboratory director failed to ensure successful participation in an HHS approved proficiency testing -- 2 of 3 -- program for the analyte glucose for two consecutive testing events in 2024 (Event 3) and 2025 (Event 1). Refer to D2096. -- 3 of 3 --

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 Noted deficiencies and plans of correction were discussed with the laboratory representative(s) at the exit conference. The facility was found to be in compliance with applicable Conditions in the CLIA program, and recertification is recommended. D5213 EVALUATION OF PROFICIENCY TESTING PERFORMANCE CFR(s): 493.1236(b)(1) The laboratory must verify the accuracy of any analyte or subspecialty without analytes listed in subpart I of this part that is not evaluated or scored by a CMS- approved proficiency testing program. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on the review of the API Performance Summary, the laboratory's API Proficiency Testing records in 2023, and confirmed in an interview, the laboratory failed to have documentation of "Not graded" analytes for 3 of 3 Hematology events reviewed in 2023. The findings were: 1. Review of API Proficiency Testing Performance Evaluation page revealed "Laboratories are responsible for documenting and performing

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 An entrance conference was held with the laboratory representatives. The survey process was discussed and survey forms were provided. An opportunity for questions and comments was given. Noted deficiencies and plans of correction were discussed with the laboratory representatives at the exit conference. The laboratory representatives were given an opportunity to provide evidence of compliance with the noted deficiencies, and no such evidence was provided prior to survey exit. The facility was found to be in COMPLIANCE with applicable Conditions of Participation in the CLIA program, and recertification is recommended. Note: The CMS-2567 (Statement of Deficiencies) is an official, legal document. All information must remain unchanged except for entering the

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 An entrance conference was held with the laboratory representatives. The survey process was discussed and survey forms were provided. An opportunity for questions and comments was given. Noted deficiencies and plans of correction were discussed with the laboratory representatives at the exit conference. The laboratory representatives were given an opportunity to provide evidence of compliance with the noted deficiencies, and no such evidence was provided prior to survey exit. The facility was found to be in COMPLIANCE with applicable Conditions of Participation in the CLIA program, and recertification is recommended. Note: The CMS-2567 (Statement of Deficiencies) is an official, legal document. All information must remain unchanged except for entering the

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 An entrance conference was held with the laboratory representatives. The survey process was discussed and survey forms were provided. An opportunity for questions and comments was given. Noted deficiencies and plans of correction were discussed with the laboratory representatives at the exit conference. The laboratory representatives were given an opportunity to provide evidence of compliance with the noted deficiencies, and no such evidence was provided prior to survey exit. The facility was found to be in COMPLIANCE with applicable Conditions of Participation in the CLIA program, and recertification is recommended. Note: The CMS-2567 (Statement of Deficiencies) is an official, legal document. All information must remain unchanged except for entering the

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 The following deficiencies are a result of a desk review of proficiency testing scores obtained from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) national database and verified with the proficiency testing company, American Proficiency Institute (API). The facility was found to be out of compliance with the conditions of participation of the CLIA program. The following CONDITION LEVEL DEFICIENCIES were found to be out of compliance: 493.803 Successful participation in a proficiency testing program 493.1403 Laboratory Director, Moderate Complexity D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- Based on a desk review of proficiency testing records, it was determined the laboratory had not successfully participated in a proficiency testing program approved by HHS, for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. The laboratory did not successfully participate in the specialty of Routine Chemistry for the Chloride analyte. Refer to D2096. D2087 ROUTINE CHEMISTRY CFR(s): 493.841(a) Failure to attain a score of at least 80 percent of acceptable responses for each analyte in each testing event is unsatisfactory analyte performance for the testing event. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a proficiency testing desk review of CMS form 0155 and American Proficiency Institute (API) records, the laboratory failed to attain a satisfactory score of at least 80% acceptable responses for each analyte in the subspecialty of Routine Chemistry for the Chloride analyte. Findings included: 1. Review of the CMS 0155 report revealed the following results: API 2019 - 2nd Event laboratory received an unsatisfactory score 20% for Chloride. API 2020 - 1st Event laboratory received an unsatisfactory score of 40% for Chloride. 2. Review of the laboratory's API proficiency testing records revealed the following results: API 2019 - 2nd Event laboratory received an unsatisfactory score 20% for Chloride. API 2020 - 1st Event laboratory received an unsatisfactory score of 40% for Chloride. D2096 ROUTINE CHEMISTRY CFR(s): 493.841(f) Failure to achieve satisfactory performance for the same analyte or test in two consecutive testing events or two out of three consecutive testing events is unsuccessful performance. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of proficiency testing (PT) records from 2019 (2nd and 3rd Events) and 2020 (1st Event), it was revealed that the laboratory failed to achieve satisfactory performance (80% or greater) for the same analyte in two consecutive testing events or two out of three consecutive testing events in the specialty of Routine Chemistry for the Chloride analyte. Two out of three unsatisfactory scores result in unsuccessful PT performance. Findings included: 1. Review of the CMS 0155 report revealed the following results: API 2019 - 2nd Event laboratory received an unsatisfactory score 20% for Chloride. API 2020 - 1st Event laboratory received an unsatisfactory score of 40% for Chloride. 2. Review of the laboratory's API proficiency testing records revealed the following results: API 2019 - 2nd Event laboratory received an unsatisfactory score 20% for Chloride. API 2020 - 1st Event laboratory received an unsatisfactory score of 40% for Chloride. D6000 MODERATE COMPLEXITY LABORATORY DIRECTOR CFR(s): 493.1403 The laboratory must have a director who meets the qualification requirements of 493. 1405 of this subpart and provides overall management and direction in accordance with 493.1407 of this subpart. -- 2 of 3 -- This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: Based on a desk review of laboratory proficiency testing performance it was revealed that the laboratory director failed to provide overall management and direction of the laboratory services. Refer to D6016. D6016 LABORATORY DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 493.1407(e)(4)(i) The laboratory director is responsible for the overall operation and administration of the laboratory, including the employment of personnel who are competent to perform test procedures, and record and report test results promptly, accurate, and proficiently and for assuring compliance with the applicable regulations. (e) The laboratory director must-- (e)(4)(i) Ensure that the proficiency testing samples are tested as required under Subpart H of this part; This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a desk review of proficiency testing results it was revealed that the laboratory director failed to ensure the overall quality of the laboratory services provided. The laboratory director failed to ensure successful participation in a HHS approved proficiency testing program. Refer to D2096. -- 3 of 3 --