Utica Park Clinic Chouteau

CLIA Laboratory Citation Details

4
Total Citations
19
Total Deficiencyies
6
Unique D-Tags
CMS Certification Number 37D1076263
Address 108 W Main St, Chouteau, OK, 74337
City Chouteau
State OK
Zip Code74337
Phone918 476-6030
Lab DirectorMITCHELL COLLIER

Citation History (4 surveys)

Survey - July 10, 2024

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: G1GM11

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D1001 D0000 D1001

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 The recertification survey was performed on 07/10/2024. The laboratory was found in compliance with standard-level deficiencies cited. The findings were reviewed with the technical consultant at the conclusion of the survey. D1001 CERTIFICATE OF WAIVER TESTS CFR(s): 493.15(e) Laboratories eligible for a certificate of waiver must-- (1) Follow manufacturers' instructions for performing the test; and (2) Meet the requirements in subpart B, Certificate of Waiver, of this part. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of records, manufacturer's instructions, and interview with the technical consultant, the laboratory failed to ensure the humidity was maintained as required by the manufacturer of the Clinitek Status + analyzer for three of three months reviewed in 2024. Findings include: (1) On 07/10/2024 at 09:30 am, the technical consultant stated urinalysis and microalbumin testing was performed using the Clinitek Status+ analyzer; (2) A review of the operator's manual for the analyzer required the relative humidity be maintained at 18-80%; (3) A review of laboratory humidity records from January through March 2024 identified humidity readings were less than 18% for two of three months as follows: (a) January 2024 - One of 23 humidity readings were documented as less than 18%; (b) February 2024 - Two of 20 humidity readings were documented as less than 18:%; (4) The records were reviewed with the technical consultant who stated on 07/10/2024 at 9:30 am, the laboratory humidity had not been maintained as required by the manufacturer as shown above. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 1 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - May 24, 2022

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: XRQU11

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D5401 D0000 D5401

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 The recertification survey was performed on 05/24/2022. The findings were reviewed with the technical consultant at the conclusion of the survey. The laboratory was found in compliance with standard-level deficiencies cited. D5401 PROCEDURE MANUAL CFR(s): 493.1251(a) A written procedures manual for all tests, assays, and examinations performed by the laboratory must be available to, and followed by, laboratory personnel. Textbooks may supplement but not replace the laboratory's written procedures for testing or examining specimens. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of the policy and procedure manual and interview with the technical consultant, the laboratory failed to follow written procedures for CBC (Complete Blood Count) testing for one of two patient reports. Findings include: (1) On 05/24/2022 at 10:00 am, the technical consultant stated the following: (a) CBC testing was performed on the Medonic M-Series hematology analyzer. (2) The surveyor reviewed the written procedures titled, "Medonic Flagged Results Policy", which stated: (a) "WBC Differential results may be flagged BD, NM, OM, and TM If the patient sample is flagged the sample is held for 5-10 minutes and the test repeated. If the flags have been removed or are still present in the same location the results are reported. At the physician's discretion the sample may be referred for further testing." (b) "If the sample volume is not sufficient for repeat analysis, another sample can be drawn OR the flagged result may not be reported in LabDaq and, if paper printouts are reviewed by the provider, the flagged results must be blacked out completely." (3) The surveyor reviewed two patient records that had been tested on 03/15/22 and 05/13 /2022. For one of two patient records there was no indication the laboratory staff followed their written procedure as follows: (a) Patient reported on 03/15/2022 at 09: 09 am - No evidence the provider reviewed the OM flag; (3) The surveyor reviewed Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 2 -- the findings with the technical consultant who stated on 05/24/22 at 10:30 am that the procedure had not been followed as indicated above. -- 2 of 2 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - October 12, 2020

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: JUJX11

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D1001 D5421 D5807 D1001 D5401 D5401 D5421 D5807

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 The recertification survey was performed on 10/12/2020. The findings were reviewed with the technical consultant at the conclusion of the survey. The laboratory was found in compliance with standard-level deficiencies cited. D1001 CERTIFICATE OF WAIVER TESTS CFR(s): 493.15(e) Laboratories eligible for a certificate of waiver must-- (1) Follow manufacturers' instructions for performing the test; and (2) Meet the requirements in subpart B, Certificate of Waiver, of this part. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of manufacturer's instructions, observation of the laboratory, and interview with the technical consultant, the laboratory failed to follow the manufacturer's instructions for waived testing. Findings include: (1) At the beginning of the survey, the technical consultant stated the laboratory performed patient glucose testing using the Contour analyzer; (2) The surveyor reviewed the manufacturer's instructions for the test strips which stated, "Check the expiration dates on your test strips and control solution. It is important to not use the test strips or control solution if the expiration date printed on the bottle label and carton has passed."; (3) The surveyor then observed one bottle of expired test strips available for patient use (lot# DW83J3D01D with an expiration date of 02/29/2020); (4) The surveyor reviewed the above findings with the technical consultant who stated on 10/12/2020 at 12:15 pm the test strips were expired. D5401 PROCEDURE MANUAL CFR(s): 493.1251(a) A written procedures manual for all tests, assays, and examinations performed by the laboratory must be available to, and followed by, laboratory personnel. Textbooks Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- may supplement but not replace the laboratory's written procedures for testing or examining specimens. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of the policy and procedure manual and interview with the technical consultant, the laboratory failed to follow written procedures for CBC (Complete Blood Count) testing. Findings include: LOT VERIFICATION (1) At the beginning of the survey, the technical consultant stated to the surveyor: (a) CBC testing was performed on the Medonic M-Series hematology analyzer; (b) The laboratory tested 3 levels (Low, Normal, High) of Boule Con-Diff Quality Control (QC) materials each day of patient testing. (2) Later during the survey, the surveyor reviewed the written procedure titled, "Quality Control" which stated, (a) "New lot will be tested in parallel with previous lot to verify the manufacturer's stated ranges." (3) The surveyor reviewed records for 6 control lot numbers. There was no evidence the provided ranges were verified before the lot numbers were put into use for 3 of 6 lot numbers as follows: (a) Low control (lot #2202-31), normal control (lot #2202-32), and high control (lot #2202-33) put into use on 06/10/2020. (3) The findings were reviewed with the technical consultant who stated on 10/12/2020 at 03:45 pm the manufacturer's ranges had not been verified before the above lot numbers had been put into use. CRITERIA FOR REPEATING CBC SAMPLES (1) The surveyor reviewed the written procedures titled, "Medonic Flagged Results Policy", which stated, (a) "WBC Differential results may be flagged BD, NM, OM, and TM If the patient sample is flagged the sample is held for 5-10 minutes and the test repeated. If the flags have been removed or are still present in the same location the results are reported. At the physician's discretion the sample may be referred for further testing." (2) The surveyor reviewed 2 patient records that had been tested between August 2020 through September 2020. For 1 of 2 patient records there was no indication the laboratory staff followed their written procedure as follows: (a) Patient tested 08/25 /2020 at 09:47 am - OM flag. (3) The surveyor reviewed the findings with technical consultant who stated on 10/12/2020 at 03:00 pm that the procedure had not been followed as indicated above. D5421 ESTABLISHMENT AND VERIFICATION OF PERFORMANCE CFR(s): 493.1253(b)(1) Each laboratory that introduces an unmodified, FDA-cleared or approved test system must do the following before reporting patient test results: (1)(i) Demonstrate that it can obtain performance specifications comparable to those established by the manufacturer for the following performance characteristics: (1)(i)(A) Accuracy. (1)(i) (B) Precision. (1)(i)(C) Reportable range of test results for the test system. (1)(ii) Verify that the manufacturer's reference intervals (normal values) are appropriate for the laboratory's patient population. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of records, and interview with the technical consultant, the laboratory failed to ensure the verified reportable range was used by the laboratory. Findings include: (1) At the beginning of the survey, the technical consultant stated the laboratory began using the Medonic M-Series analyzer to perform routine CBC (Complete Blood Count) testing beginning 07/19/2018; (2) The surveyor reviewed the validation records for the analyzer. The reportable range was verified as follows: (a) Platelet 30 - 959 x 10 ^ 9 /L (3) The surveyor then reviewed the analyzer's reportable -- 2 of 3 -- range and identified the following reportable range used by the laboratory was wider than the verified reportable range: (a) Platelet 30 - 1800 x 10 ^ 9 /L (4) The surveyor reviewed the result with the technical consultant who stated on 10/12/2020 at 03:45 pm the laboratory analyzer 's reportable range was wider than the verified reportable range. D5807 TEST REPORT CFR(s): 493.1291(d) Pertinent "reference intervals" or "normal" values, as determined by the laboratory performing the tests, must be available to the authorized person who ordered the tests and, if applicable, the individual responsible for using the test results. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of records and interview with the technical consultant, the laboratory failed to ensure reference intervals were determined as appropriate for the laboratory's patient population. Findings include: (1) At the beginning of the survey, the technical consultant stated to the surveyor CBC (Complete Blood Count) testing was performed using the Medonic M-Series analyzer; (2) Later during the surveyor, the surveyor reviewed two patient CBC reports - the first report was for an adult male patient with the testing performed on 10/12/2020 at 10:15 am; the second report was for an adult female patient with the testing performed on 12/12/2020 at 09:15 am. Both reports included the same reference intervals for the CBC parameters of RBC (Red Blood Cell), Hemoglobin, and Hematocrit which were: (a) RBC - 4.10 - 5.50 M /L (b) Hemoglobin - 14.0 - 18.0 g/dL (c) Hematocrit - 42.0 -52.0 % (3) The surveyor reviewed the findings with the technical consultant, who stated on 10/12/2020 at 02: 15 pm the patient reports did not include gender specific reference ranges. NOTE: Routinely, female reference intervals for the analytes RBC, Hemoglobin, and Hematocrit are lower than male reference intervals. -- 3 of 3 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access

Survey - June 27, 2018

Survey Type: Standard

Survey Event ID: 4XR111

Deficiency Tags: D0000 D5805

Summary:

Summary Statement of Deficiencies D0000 The findings were reviewed with the technical consultant at the conclusion of the survey. The laboratory was found to be in compliance with standard-level deficiencies cited. D5805 TEST REPORT CFR(s): 493.1291(c) The test report must indicate the following: (c)(1) For positive patient identification, either the patient's name and identification number, or a unique patient identifier and identification number. (c)(2) The name and address of the laboratory location where the test was performed. (c)(3) The test report date. (c)(4) The test performed. (c)(5) Specimen source, when appropriate. (c)(6) The test result and, if applicable, the units of measurement or interpretation, or both. (c)(7) Any information regarding the condition and disposition of specimens that do not meet the laboratory's criteria for acceptability. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of records and interview with the technical consultant, the laboratory failed to ensure patient test reports included the address of the laboratory location. Findings include: (1) At the beginning of the survey, the technical consultant stated to the surveyor the laboratory performed CBC (Complete Blood Count) testing using the Diatron Abacus 3 CP analyzer; (2) The surveyor then reviewed 1 patient report: (a) Report #1 - CBC performed on 10/13/2017 (3) It was identified that the address of the laboratory on the report was "108 W Main Ave", which did not match the address on the CLIA certificate. The address on the CLIA certificate was "108 W Main"; (4) The surveyor reviewed the report with the technical consultant who stated the address on the report did not match the address on the CLIA certificate. Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 1 --

πŸ”’ Unlock Deficiency Summary

Get full access to the detailed deficiency summary for this facility

One-time payment β€’ Lifetime access