Summary:
Summary Statement of Deficiencies D2016 SUCCESSFUL PARTICIPATION CFR(s): 493.803(a)(b)(c) (a) Each laboratory performing nonwaived testing must successfully participate in a proficiency testing program approved by CMS, if applicable, as described in subpart I of this part for each specialty, subspecialty, and analyte or test in which the laboratory is certified under CLIA. (b) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if a laboratory fails to participate successfully in proficiency testing for a given specialty, subspecialty, analyte or test, as defined in this section, or fails to take remedial action when an individual fails gynecologic cytology, CMS imposes sanctions, as specified in subpart R of this part. (c) If a laboratory fails to perform successfully in a CMS- approved proficiency testing program, for the initial unsuccessful performance, CMS may direct the laboratory to undertake training of its personnel or to obtain technical assistance, or both, rather than imposing alternative or principle sanctions except when one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) There is immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety. (2) The laboratory fails to provide CMS or a CMS agent with satisfactory evidence that it has taken steps to correct the problem identified by the unsuccessful proficiency testing performance. (3) The laboratory has a poor compliance history. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: . Based on review of 2019 and 2020 CMS Casper Reports 155D, 153D and the American Proficiency Institute (API) proficiency testing results, it was determined the laboratory failed to participate in the second Hematology proficiency testing event of 2019 and the first Hematology proficiency testing event of 2020 for the Specialty of Hematology and each Hematology test as evidenced by: Failure to participate in a testing event is unsatisfactory performance and results in a score of 0 for the testing event as cited at D 2123. D2123 HEMATOLOGY Statement of Deficiencies (X1) Provider/Supplier/CLIA Identification Number (X3) Date Survey Completed Name of Provider or Supplier Street Address, City, State -- 1 of 3 -- CFR(s): 493.851(c) Failure to participate in a testing event is unsatisfactory performance and results in a score of 0 for the testing event. Consideration may be given to those laboratories failing to participate in a testing event only if-- (1) Patient testing was suspended during the time frame allotted for testing and reporting proficiency testing results; (2) The laboratory notifies the inspecting agency and the proficiency testing program within the time frame for submitting proficiency testing results of the suspension of patient testing and the circumstances associated with failure to perform tests on proficiency testing samples; and (3) The laboratory participated in the previous two proficiency testing events. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: . Based on review of the 2019 and 2020 CMS Casper Reports 155D and 153D and API proficiency testing results, it was determined the laboratory failed to participate in the second proficiency testing event of 2019 and the first proficiency testing events of 2020, resulting in a score of 0% for the Specialty of Hematology and the test of White Blood Cell Differential (WBC DIFF), Red Blood Cell Count (RBC), Hemoglobin ( HGB), Hematocrit (HCT), White Blood Cell Count (WBC), and Platelets (PLTS) as evidenced by: A. The laboratory received a score of 0% for the Specialty of Hematology in the second proficiency testing event of 2019 and the first proficiency testing event of 2020. B. The laboratory received a score of 0% for the test of WBC DIFF, RBC, HGB, HCT, WBC and PLTS in the second proficiency testing event of 2019 and the first proficiency testing event of 2020. D6000 MODERATE COMPLEXITY LABORATORY DIRECTOR CFR(s): 493.1403 The laboratory must have a director who meets the qualification requirements of 493. 1405 of this subpart and provides overall management and direction in accordance with 493.1407 of this subpart. This CONDITION is not met as evidenced by: . Based on a review of the 2019 and 2020 proficiency testing results, it was determined the Laboratory Director failed to ensure that